revenue from non match days
apprently it will be more than 72k we made last season
The answer to this is always yesSorry am i missing something
We are all missing something!The answer to this is always yes
We need to see the business plan for both options. As yet we don't have one for either so it's currently an impossible question with no answer.
IMO its less to do with the rent, even if you assume we could get a new deal at the same rent, and more to do with the rapidly spiralling costs and poor treatment of the club and its fans.I'm not a business head, but I'm assuming the Ricoh rent is unsustainable somewhat?
Mark me down as a definite NO please. Until I change my mind on a whim, at which point iI'll be a definite YES.Won't stop people though. Do a poll.
Mark me down as a definite NO please. Until I change my mind on a whim, at which point iI'll be a definite YES.
We are all missing something!
I've tried not reading into this saga as I'm getting bored of it now. From what I have seen are the Wasps struggling as it is?
Surely this is just another tactic by SISU to try and get hold of a percentage in the Ricoh ownership maybe?
Like I said I've not been reading much into it so I might be wrong...
IMO its less to do with the rent, even if you assume we could get a new deal at the same rent, and more to do with the rapidly spiralling costs and poor treatment of the club and its fans.
Rent is only part of the cost of playing at the Ricoh. Also people need to stop falling into the trap of comparing the rent now to before we left. Its not comparing like with like.
Won't stop people though. Do a poll.
I hadn't even given that a thought but you might just be right.Wasps are playing a waiting game 'probably' already negotiating with a third party/FL waiting to pick the moment.
IMO its less to do with the rent, even if you assume we could get a new deal at the same rent, and more to do with the rapidly spiralling costs and poor treatment of the club and its fans.
Rent is only part of the cost of playing at the Ricoh. Also people need to stop falling into the trap of comparing the rent now to before we left. Its not comparing like with like.
It's about a bunch of different people all trying to do what's best for other organisations. In doing so they are making decisions that affect CCFC negatively.
Wasps doing what's best for Wasps
SISU doing what's best for SISU (not as some are misguided on her what's best for CCFC)
Council what's best for the whole City
Jon Sharpe what's best for CRFC.
What would be best for CCFC would be. For Tim FIsher and Joy Seppalla to completely step away from CCFC. Both not have anything to do with CCFC.
2 new people come in with complete control. One with ties to the City itself and football. One with good general business pedigree but also good football business pedigree.
SISU should drop the legal action.
Then leave these two people to build a mutually beneficial relationship with Wasps and ant the council in every single area. Stadium, marketing, metchandise, physios everything.
That would be what is best for CCFC. It won't happen unfortunately and we get to debate about new stadiums, developing The Butts. Non of which will happen whilst the club is slowly getting destroyed.
It really does need Tim and Joy to completely step away and the legal action to be dropped.
CCFC will never get into anywhere while SISU are in charge be it the Ricoh or the Butts.
If I read it right that's what all parties are already saying.
Wasps are playing a waiting game 'probably' already negotiating with a third party/FL waiting to pick the moment.
Looking more like that moment will be liquidation or if we are lucky administration
So the plan is to play the Ricoh off against the Butts to get the best rental deal?
Making as much noise as possible about it so we won't notice Ryton being sold off!
I can understand Fisher stepping down but how can Seppalla ? She owns Sisu and CCFC.
No, until Sisu walk away nothing will change.
Why would Wasps allow SISU to play them off for the best rental deal? People like Italia tell us they don't need us as tenants so why would they be bothered.
They also will not enter into negotiations until legal action is dropped, so how exactly can you play off with someone who doesn't want to deal with you.
It's just something that has been passed onto me. They also mentioned names (that I know) but it's pointless expanding on it because and the end of the day, it's just a Chinese whisper.Who exactly would Wasps be negotiating with, what sort of third party? as the evidence of this is nil apart from your opinion. So genuinely what exactly does that mean in your honest opinion? as I see a Rugby club whose business plan is falling short.
Assume he was referring to Anderson who tried to draw a line under past actions and start talks only for Wasps to pull out of talks regarding the Ricoh and CSF to pull out of talks regarding HIggs.Am I right in thinking that when he stood aside we came back to the Ricoh then only just missed out on the play offs.
If nobody talked about Chinese Whispers this place would be very quiet! Might as well just post what you've been told.It's just something that has been passed onto me. They also mentioned names (that I know) but it's pointless expanding on it because and the end of the day, it's just a Chinese whisper.
I'm not sure if I have said that Wasps don't want CCFC here.Why would Wasps allow SISU to play them off for the best rental deal? People like Italia tell us they don't need us as tenants so why would they be bothered.
They also will not enter into negotiations until legal action is dropped, so how exactly can you play off with someone who doesn't want to deal with you.
Can I just say it's awkward?If nobody talked about Chinese Whispers this place would be very quiet! Might as well just post what you've been told.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?