Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Ricoh events and Wasps ticket outlet (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Otis
  • Start date Apr 8, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 4 of 12 Next Last

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #106
SkyBlueZack said:
was that their new found fans who usually watched the football? Wasn't you was it italia? ;-)
Click to expand...

I sleep on the printout
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #107
chiefdave said:
While I was checking the historical average attendances for Wasps I thought I'd copy various comments I saw.
Click to expand...

I’ve never been in the “hate Wasps” camp, but I’m always willing to be persuaded by proper arguments / evidence, and the list of comments you posted is quite distressing – thanks for unearthing them CD, because I had looked in vain a few times for such stuff on the web. It’s never nice to see fans of any sports club mistreated.

But then I keep coming back to the feeble nature of the opposition that was put up. No marches or anything like that, and I think there was a petition that only mustered a small fraction of their home gate. Compare that to the furious storms of protests and activities that accompanied the Sixfields move (even though it was temporary). Different sports, different tribal attitudes, different circumstances, different motives, different effects. IMHO it’s wrong to say, as it often is on here, that the two things are equivalent.

Why the different reactions? By the time of the move, most Wasps fans lived around Wycombe, but that town couldn’t really claim to own Wasps could it? And it’s some distance from London - the only consensus about where they should play seemed to be along the lines of “somewhere in London or the Home Counties”. That’s a truly enormous area which suggests no real sense of place among the fans - like Birmingham City playing in Stratford on Avon for 12 years and then people suggesting Lichfield or Halesowen. By contrast, everybody knows that Coventry City belong specifically in Coventry and NOWHERE ELSE.

The move is done & dusted, is most likely successful, and seems to be giving pleasure to many people including a lot of traditional Wasps fans. I respect the “evil franchise” argument, I just think it’s overdone and pointless. The cause of our problems lies elsewhere.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #108
Calista said:
I’ve never been in the “hate Wasps” camp, but I’m always willing to be persuaded by proper arguments / evidence, and the list of comments you posted is quite distressing – thanks for unearthing them CD, because I had looked in vain a few times for such stuff on the web. It’s never nice to see fans of any sports club mistreated.

But then I keep coming back to the feeble nature of the opposition that was put up. No marches or anything like that, and I think there was a petition that only mustered a small fraction of their home gate. Compare that to the furious storms of protests and activities that accompanied the Sixfields move (even though it was temporary). Different sports, different tribal attitudes, different circumstances, different motives, different effects. IMHO it’s wrong to say, as it often is on here, that the two things are equivalent.

Why the different reactions? By the time of the move, most Wasps fans lived around Wycombe, but that town couldn’t really claim to own Wasps could it? And it’s some distance from London - the only consensus about where they should play seemed to be along the lines of “somewhere in London or the Home Counties”. That’s a truly enormous area which suggests no real sense of place among the fans - like Birmingham City playing in Stratford on Avon for 12 years and then people suggesting Lichfield or Halesowen. By contrast, everybody knows that Coventry City belong specifically in Coventry and NOWHERE ELSE.

The move is done & dusted, is most likely successful, and seems to be giving pleasure to many people including a lot of traditional Wasps fans. I respect the “evil franchise” argument, I just think it’s overdone and pointless. The cause of our problems lies elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Pretty dumb though isn't it to say we were opposed to franchised sport when we are a city that embraces it?

As for furious storms of protest - when? A fee thousand strolling around town, 3 blokes and a dog at FA Hq and a few people standing on a hill? Hardly the Tollpuddle Martyrs is it?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #109
I think a big part of it was that is was only made public once it was a done deal. Think about how long it took before there was a decent sized protest against the Sixfields move.
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #110
Grendel said:
Pretty dumb though isn't it to say we were opposed to franchised sport when we are a city that embraces it?

As for furious storms of protest - when? A fee thousand strolling around town, 3 blokes and a dog at FA Hq and a few people standing on a hill? Hardly the Tollpuddle Martyrs is it?
Click to expand...

The protests against Northampton weren't fancy notions about being opposed to franchised sport. It was much simpler - Coventry City have to play in Coventry. Strange that you can so easily dismiss the march in Cov and the season-long hill protests by CCFC fans. Yet you endlessly argue a moral case on behalf of Wasps fans, who couldn't even be bothered to "stroll around" High Wycombe or London or wherever they belong.
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #111
chiefdave said:
I think a big part of it was that is was only made public once it was a done deal. Think about how long it took before there was a decent sized protest against the Sixfields move.
Click to expand...

It's a fair point - although I have to say that it took me precisely half a second to decide that I wouldn't go to games in Northampton, even though Mr. Fisher presumed I would. That boycott by the vast majority of City supporters was in itself a protest, and it kicked in on day one.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #112
Calista said:
That boycott by the vast majority of City supporters was in itself a protest, and it kicked in on day one.
Click to expand...

Given the % of ticket sales they claim to be to CV postcodes the same could be said of Wasps fans. The difference is the Northampton public didn't turn up in their thousands to support a team that had moved to another city.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #113
What was the % from CV postcodes?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #114
Sick Boy said:
What was the % from CV postcodes?
Click to expand...

Can't remember exactly, they said something along the lines of 70% of tickets were CV1 - CV6 postcodes. If you then add in other local areas outside those postcodes thats a very large % so not many coming from Wycombe.

And of course that was last season when they were laying on free transport from London and Wycombe so likely to be lower now.

I've said before there's a reason Wasps haven't said what % of pre-Ricoh season ticket holders have renewed.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 26, 2016
  • #115
Sick Boy said:
What was the % from CV postcodes?
Click to expand...

92% according to Eastwood.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #116
Calista said:
The protests against Northampton weren't fancy notions about being opposed to franchised sport. It was much simpler - Coventry City have to play in Coventry. Strange that you can so easily dismiss the march in Cov and the season-long hill protests by CCFC fans. Yet you endlessly argue a moral case on behalf of Wasps fans, who couldn't even be bothered to "stroll around" High Wycombe or London or wherever they belong.
Click to expand...

It's because it showed up SISU and their decision making. Grendull doesn't like to speak out against SISU or the disastrous decisions they make for CCFC. He much prefers to cause a distraction from that by endlessly waffling on about wasps, ccc, Higgs, Andy thorn, the ct etc. etc.

They would have gotten away with it to if it wasn't for those pesky strolling around the town protesters.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #117
skybluetony176 said:
It's because it showed up SISU and their decision making. Grendull doesn't like to speak out against SISU or the disastrous decisions they make for CCFC. He much prefers to cause a distraction from that by endlessly waffling on about wasps, ccc, Higgs, Andy thorn, the ct etc. etc.

They would have gotten away with it to if it wasn't for those pesky strolling around the town protesters.
Click to expand...

Gotten away with what?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #118
Grendel said:
Gotten away with what?
Click to expand...

Well at least you finally admit that you think they've done nothing wrong. I guess that means your old "I know SISU carry some of the blame but..." get out line is finally out the window.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #119
skybluetony176 said:
Well at least you finally admit that you think they've done nothing wrong. I guess that means your old "I know SISU carry some of the blame but..." get out line is finally out the window.
Click to expand...

Sorry? You said gotten away with it. I didn't know what you were referring to? Gotten away with what?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #120
Grendel said:
Sorry? You said gotten away with it. I didn't know what you were referring to? Gotten away with what?
Click to expand...

If you thought that they've done something wrong you really wouldn't have to be asking now would you?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #121
Grendel said:
Pretty dumb though isn't it to say we were opposed to franchised sport when we are a city that embraces it?

As for furious storms of protest - when? A fee thousand strolling around town, 3 blokes and a dog at FA Hq and a few people standing on a hill? Hardly the Tollpuddle Martyrs is it?
Click to expand...

You expose your pro SISU agenda by dismissing 2 very well attended protest marches as nothing but a stroll around town. You could only say that if you didn't really care that CCFC were not playing in Coventry.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #122
Captain Dart said:
You expose your pro SISU agenda by dismissing 2 very well attended protest marches as nothing but a stroll around town. You could only say that if you didn't really care that CCFC were not playing in Coventry.
Click to expand...

Are you going to reply to my PMs or not?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #123
Captain Dart said:
You expose your pro SISU agenda by dismissing 2 very well attended protest marches as nothing but a stroll around town. You could only say that if you didn't really care that CCFC were not playing in Coventry.
Click to expand...

Backed up by attending with the minority at Sixfields.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #124
skybluetony176 said:
Well at least you finally admit that you think they've done nothing wrong. I guess that means your old "I know SISU carry some of the blame but..." get out line is finally out the window.
Click to expand...

Gotten away with what, Tony?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #125
italiahorse said:
Backed up by attending with the minority at Sixfields.
Click to expand...

I thought you didnt critcise people who went to Sixfields. A bit hypoctitical in my opinion.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #126
Moff said:
I thought you didnt critcise people who went to Sixfields. A bit hypoctitical in my opinion.[/

Not criticising him for going just pointing out that Sisu plan needed him there.
Click to expand...
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #127
fernandopartridge said:
Gotten away with what, Tony?
Click to expand...

As a collective of fans we held them accountable wether that be the two marches, legends game, the continuos presence on the Hill, petition, boycotting Sixfields etc.

Something to be proud of not dismissive of I'm sure you'll agree.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #128
italiahorse said:
Moff said:
I thought you didnt critcise people who went to Sixfields. A bit hypoctitical in my opinion.[/

Not criticising him for going just pointing out that Sisu plan needed him there.
Click to expand...

The SISU plan did need people there and it failed. As you would say, 'you need to move on'

I dont balme fans for going, it was SISU that moved us not them. On the other hand whereas you deny it, I suspect your post has the tone of criticism about it.
Click to expand...
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #129
italiahorse said:
Not criticising him for going just pointing out that Sisu plan needed him there.
Click to expand...

What was the sisu plan then?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #130
skybluetony176 said:
As a collective of fans we held them accountable wether that be the two marches, legends game, the continuos presence on the Hill, petition, boycotting Sixfields etc.

Something to be proud of not dismissive of I'm sure you'll agree.
Click to expand...

He asked what they had or would have gotten away with.

Why will you not answer the point?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #131
Grendel said:
He asked what they had or would have gotten away with.

Why will you not answer the point?
Click to expand...

Are you pretending to be stupid or are we to believe that you don't know what the protests, petition and boycott of Sixfields were about?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #132
skybluetony176 said:
Are you pretending to be stupid or are we to believe that you don't know what the protests, petition and boycott of Sixfields were about?
Click to expand...

To stop sisu getting away with something you said? What?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #133
Grendel said:
To stop sisu getting away with something you said? What?
Click to expand...

So you don't know what the protests etc. were about. That explains alot.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #134
skybluetony176 said:
So you don't know what the protests etc. were about. That explains alot.
Click to expand...

Fair enough you made a comment you can't back up and now are embarrassed - same as yesterday with some player that didn't exist.

I'll leave you alone now.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #135
Grendel said:
Fair enough you made a comment you can't back up and now are embarrassed - same as yesterday with some player that didn't exist.

I'll leave you alone now.
Click to expand...

Oh dear. Would I not play along with you're leading questions so you've had to result to plan B, personal attacks. Seriously, if you don't know what the protests, boycott etc. was over read up. It's well documented from a number of sources. Local papers covered the marches extensively, the national papers picked up the back ground also. You might find it very revealing as you've clearly missed alot.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #136
Grendel said:
What was the sisu plan then?
Click to expand...

You tell me you went along with it ?

No, I'll entertain you again.
They wanted to obtain the Ricoh freehold but were not prepared to pay what it was worth.
They needed to do that to get back money they lost in CCFC due to their poor management and lack of due diligence.
The plan had no regards for fans who were placed in an unenviable position of having to support the team knowing what Sisu were up to.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #137
italiahorse said:
You tell me you went along with it ?

No, I'll entertain you again.
They wanted to obtain the Ricoh freehold but were not prepared to pay what it was worth.
They needed to do that to get back money they lost in CCFC due to their poor management and lack of due diligence.
The plan had no regards for fans who were placed in an unenviable position of having to support the team knowing what Sisu were up to.
Click to expand...


They needed to do that to get back money they lost in CCFC due to their poor management and lack of due diligence.

Why did the Wasps owner pay himself back when the bonds came in? Why did he wait to get some of his money back when they took over the Ricoh?

The plan had no regards for fans who were placed in an unenviable position of having to support the team knowing what Sisu were up to.

Wasps had regard for fans when they moved them PERMANENTLY about 80 miles?

Is your post a wind up or do you miss the irony completely?
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #138
chiefdave said:
Can't remember exactly, they said something along the lines of 70% of tickets were CV1 - CV6 postcodes. If you then add in other local areas outside those postcodes thats a very large % so not many coming from Wycombe.

And of course that was last season when they were laying on free transport from London and Wycombe so likely to be lower now.

I've said before there's a reason Wasps haven't said what % of pre-Ricoh season ticket holders have renewed.
Click to expand...

I'm sure I read that in recent years at Adams Park, 80% of Wasps STH's were from the Wycombe area, so in effect they'd already turned over their support from one place to another. I realise that two wrongs don't make a right, and moving to Coventry was basically a second offence. But it tends to destroy the argument that Wasps should have gone to Upton Park or wherever, because that would have been just as much of a kick in the teeth for the Buckinghamshire supporters. The bottom line is that everyone knew Adams Park wasn't sustainable, and there was no scenario that didn't involve creating some losers. Coventry ended up "acquiring" a top-level sports club, and however distasteful that is in terms of sporting tradition, it's something that I suspect any other local authority would have done under the circumstances. It's happened.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #139
Calista said:
I suspect any other other local authority would have done under the circumstances. It's happened.
Click to expand...

Even after saying how wrong it is to move clubs?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 27, 2016
  • #140
Calista said:
I'm sure I read that in recent years at Adams Park, 80% of Wasps STH's were from the Wycombe area, so in effect they'd already turned over their support from one place to another. I realise that two wrongs don't make a right, and moving to Coventry was basically a second offence. But it tends to destroy the argument that Wasps should have gone to Upton Park or wherever, because that would have been just as much of a kick in the teeth for the Buckinghamshire supporters. The bottom line is that everyone knew Adams Park wasn't sustainable, and there was no scenario that didn't involve creating some losers. Coventry ended up "acquiring" a top-level sports club, and however distasteful that is in terms of sporting tradition, it's something that I suspect any other local authority would have done under the circumstances. It's happened.
Click to expand...

Isn't this a rehash of a post you made two years ago?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 4 of 12 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?