Response from Football League (1 Viewer)

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
Had this email back from Football league today...nothing new I can read- apologies if there have been other similar postings- Nick please delete/lock if so?

Dear XXXXX

Thank you for your email and the points you raise. We have received numerous emails and telephone calls from Coventry City fans concerned at the on-going situation at the club. We can assure you that your email has been read but given the volume of emails, we cannot always provide an individual response.

As background, it is worth clarifying the administration process and explaining the role of The Football League. The administrator is an officer of the High Court and owes duties to both the Court and creditors. It is the administrator that controls whatever assets an insolvent company holds and he has to determine the sale process in accordance with principles of Insolvency Law. The League plays no part in this and ultimately has to try and work with the administrator’s nominated purchaser. The Football League’s role is to administer and regulate the competition that it’s members play in and only has the power to do so within its regulations. These are available to view on our website here:http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/RegulationsIndex/0,,10794,00.html.

The administrator sold the assets under his control to Otium Entertainment Group and The League currently remains in discussions with Otium and the administrator to determine whether the Club can exit from administration in accordance with our Insolvency Policy.

Each Football Club is a business in its own right and The Football League has no direct influence with regards to negotiations over lease agreements, stadium ownership etc. We regulate the competition that our clubs play in and ultimately aim to ensure that they all retain their membership of The League within the competition structure.

The club’s owners have for some time been in dispute with the owners of the Ricoh Arena – Arena Coventry Limited (ACL) with regards to the playing of matches at the Ricoh Arena. It is The League’s Board’s view that it is a matter of regret that to date it has not proved possible for both parties to reconcile their differences. Otium made a request to the Board of Directors of The Football League to play it’s home matches at Northampton Town’s Sixfields Stadium.

In considering this request The League has stated that it believes that clubs should play in towns and cities from which they take their name. Nonetheless, from time to time, the Board is asked to consider temporary relocations as a means of securing a club’s on-going participation in our competition. With no prospect of an agreement being reached between Otium and ACL, the Board was placed in an invidious position - with the very real possibility of Coventry City being unable to fulfil its fixtures for next season. This would inevitably call into question the club’s continued membership of The Football League.

With the new season less than four weeks away, the Board required certainty as to where the Club would play its matches from the start of the new campaign. Reluctantly, the Board of Directors of The Football League has approved the application to relocate on a temporary basis only. The League has set out certain requirements of this consent in order to ensure the best outcome possible for the football club. Otium must provide a Performance Bond of £1m with The Football League as an assurance of the club’s commitment to return to the Coventry area. In addition, the Board's approval remains entirely conditional on the Club ultimately exiting administration in accordance with The Football League’s conditions and achieving a successful transfer of its League share.

The League continues to urge both Otium and ACL to continue to explore every possible opportunity to resolve this dispute, for the good of the City of Coventry, its football club and people living in the local community.

Thank you for contacting The Football League.

Regards,

XXXXX XXXXXXXX
Customer Services Officer
The Football League Limited
www.football-league.co.uk
 

spwaverley4916

Active Member
"In addition, the Board's approval remains entirely conditional on the Club ultimately exiting administration in accordance with The Football League’s conditions and achieving a successful transfer of its League share. "

so at what point do they say " you have not yet come out of admin therefore you can no longer play at sixfields"" utter bullshit
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
I'm not totally aligned with the technicalities of this argument however I have asked for clarification around ground share and administration- forgive me if this is off target?

Dear XXXXX- Thank you for your reply.

Of course like many Coventry City fans I am disappointed that the Football League have endorsed this decision despite its own core value i.e 'the importance of fans' being clearly ignored in this instance, and I could argue many times over about the impact that this decision has on both the existing and future fan base of Coventry City and how ethically it must be judged as morally abhorrent at best. However recognising that those arguments would fall shallow on the Football Leagues recognition radar, one specific point of clarification if you would please?


Can a football club in administration, agree to a ground share agreement with another club? Particularly when the right to play in the Football league(Golden Share) is not clearly defined due to issues surrounding administration?


Thanks
 

luwalla

Well-Known Member
id reply to that email , asking them if the sale of the 'golden share' was part of the sale of assets already carried out by the administrator.. and if it was, how was that allowed, as the league rules state that the share "may not be sold" ?

if they say it wasnt sold as one of the assets, ask if the share was then always with Otium or ccfc holdings .. and if it wasnt, then how & why are Otium currently being allowed to do anything with regard to the football club , its fixtures and its place in the league.. as surely they are not the beneficial owner of the share until such point that LTD is actually sold to Otium ??
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
id reply to that email , asking them if the sale of the 'golden share' was part of the sale of assets already carried out by the administrator.. and if it was, how was that allowed, as the league rules state that the share "may not be sold" ?

if they say it wasnt sold as one of the assets, ask if the share was then always with Otium or ccfc holdings .. and if it wasnt, then how & why are Otium currently being allowed to do anything with regard to the football club , its fixtures and its place in the league.. as surely they are not the beneficial owner of the share until such point that LTD is actually sold to Otium ??

Thanks- I suspect a round of email tennis to no avail.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
So in a nutshell, they've said the following....."Hey, So long as we get our fixtures fulfilled, we don't give a toss where you play. Cheers, The FL"....
 

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
Do I understand this correctly? The creditors meeting has been adjourned for 28days? If so, how can CCFC start the season at Sixfields? As I understand it the FL will only condone such a move if out of Adnim. Perhaps they will re-write their rules to accommodate Shitzu?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Do I understand this correctly? The creditors meeting has been adjourned for 28days? If so, how can CCFC start the season at Sixfields? As I understand it the FL will only condone such a move if out of Adnim. Perhaps they will re-write their rules to accommodate Shitzu?

Nope - adjournment for 14 days then 28 day cooling off period.

The football league are using their 'discretion' as stated in their rules. They want fixtures fulfilled.
 

blend

New Member
They clearly said the following though, I had the same email reply the other day but this bit is about to become very relevant.

In addition, the Board's approval remains entirely conditional on the Club ultimately exiting administration in accordance with The Football League’s conditions and achieving a successful transfer of its League share.


CCFC Ltd are in administration still. How can they know that ultimately the club will exit administration in accordance with their private insolvency policy until they have done so? Some crystal ball they must have!!

 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
They clearly said the following though, I had the same email reply the other day but this bit is about to become very relevant.

In addition, the Board's approval remains entirely conditional on the Club ultimately exiting administration in accordance with The Football League’s conditions and achieving a successful transfer of its League share.


CCFC Ltd are in administration still. How can they know that ultimately the club will exit administration in accordance with their private insolvency policy until they have done so? Some crystal ball they must have!!


Its the only Balls they own....
 

dadgad

Well-Known Member
to be fair, i suspect youd be right.. the league have messed up here, and they cant wait to brush it all under the carpet and get on with lining their pockets elswhere

The problem though - for the FL and football in general - is that Cov away from Cov will always be a problem. It is a PR disaster for the game and any continuing fallout will more and more attention as the issues are aired. Whichever way you look at it the FL will not come out of this at all well.
 

Spionkop

New Member
Keep hammering the Football League and FA. Keep protesting. Exposing how useless they are. We've got to fight for our club. If we end up at Sixfields we've got to have the biggest possible turnout in protest. Either at Ricoh or there.
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
Just had this back...

Xxxxxx

Thank you for your reply, however we are unable to comment further at this time. The League currently remains in discussions with Otium and the administrator to determine whether the Club can exit from administration in accordance with our Insolvency Policy.

Best regards

Xxxxxx
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top