There is nobody in particular at the minute
Is this is response to a certain media personality and another board?
Pretty muchif somebody has said something that is proved to be untrue - you are ok however
so for example - if an executive said we are debt free as all debt had been converted to equity - and that is proved to be untrue, as the debt still exists . Then saying that person has been dishonest, and has abused his position of trust and responsibility is fine
If that same person says that the owner has committed funding for 3 more years - and that proves to actually be for 6 months, then the same applies
so we can attack these people enough just by sticking to actual fact
Got to be honest, some of the responses to the thread about is this Joy were pretty vile. If I was TF or his Mrs I would be extremely upset and I would definitely be threatening legal action.
If someone mismanages the club then fine you don't have to like them, if someone is the wife of someone that mismanges the club then it's a bit harsh to abuse that person.
Wouldn't be libel though? Take the point thoughExactly my point. There is disagreeing with people and there is being personal. I don't agree with donzo about Thorn but it doesn't mean I would want to shout abuse at him.
Wouldn't be libel though? Take the point though
what if I called Tim Fisher a f*%$£*g c*%t?
if somebody has said something that is proved to be untrue - you are ok however
so for example - if an executive said we are debt free as all debt had been converted to equity - and that is proved to be untrue, as the debt still exists . Then saying that person has been dishonest, and has abused his position of trust and responsibility is fine
If that same person says that the owner has committed funding for 3 more years - and that proves to actually be for 6 months, then the same applies
so we can attack these people enough just by sticking to actual fact
One of the defences to a libel action is to prove your words are substantially true, but the court would look to you to prove it. You might need deep pockets to do that.
Got to be honest, some of the responses to the thread about is this Joy were pretty vile. If I was TF or his Mrs I would be extremely upset and I would definitely be threatening legal action.
If someone mismanages the club then fine you don't have to like them, if someone is the wife of someone that mismanges the club then it's a bit harsh to abuse that person.
Does that mean I can't "shout down" anyone who disagrees with me?
henceforth it's a duel at dawn with pistols or polite conversation only!
Does that mean I can't "shout down" anyone who disagrees with me?
The forum, and therefore Nick, could get in legal trouble if things posted on here got out of hand and were seen by the people they're aimed at-which isn't really what we need at the moment.
Got to be honest, some of the responses to the thread about is this Joy were pretty vile. If I was TF or his Mrs I would be extremely upset and I would definitely be threatening legal action.
If someone mismanages the club then fine you don't have to like them, if someone is the wife of someone that mismanges the club then it's a bit harsh to abuse that person.
Exactly my point. There is disagreeing with people and there is being personal. I don't agree with donzo about Thorn but it doesn't mean I would want to shout abuse at him.
Everyone is allowed there own opinion so let them say what they feel and don't be so corrupt, I'm sure you staff admins/mods have an opinion about all the bullsh*t us fans are being faced with!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?