Reid is surely as good or better than what we have at this level?
Sorry to hear Haynes is long term injured, he would be a great asset at this level.
If he could be used as a left winger, why couldn't he be used as a right winger?Better off without players like Reid / Turnbull who didn't want to be here and thought they were better than they are!
As for Haynes, I can't see him ever getting rid of his marmite label; also can't see where he will fit in? Stokes is the no.1 LB, and even if some fans got their wish and he was tried at LM, he would never make a RM and that would stop us using the tactic of switching the two wide players, so reckon he won't feature much once he's recovered from injury
We know how good he is. He showed it last season.Reid is surely as good or better than what we have at this level?
Sorry to hear Haynes is long term injured, he would be a great asset at this level.
If he could be used as a left winger, why couldn't he be used as a right winger?
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Struggles as in......... more goals and assists from LB than Stokes (in the 2 1/2 seasons stokes has been here) in less games? He also has 5 years on Stokes so age is on his side and improvements can still be made. At 21, Haynes is still a kid. Although he seems to of been around for a while, he's only played around 40 league games for us so hasn't got much experience. The amount of people on here that stuck up for the likes of Murphy saying " he's only young" and "he's still learning his trade", so is Haynes.He struggles playing on his preferred side, never mind putting him on the other wing
And I don't see how switching wings would make him play worse???He struggles playing on his preferred side, never mind putting him on the other wing
Struggles as in......... more goals and assists from LB than Stokes (in the 2 1/2 seasons stokes has been here) in less games? He also has 5 years on Stokes so age is on his side and improvements can still be made. At 21, Haynes is still a kid. Although he seems to of been around for a while, he's only played around 40 league games for us so hasn't got much experience. The amount of people on here that stuck up for the likes of Murphy saying " he's only young" and "he's still learning his trade", so is Haynes.
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
#confused!!!!Well considering it's a defenders job to defend not score goals not sure why that's a good way to judge a left back?
Stokes is clearly the better right back.
He's been around for 5 years and made 67 appearances.
I believe the point SW88 is trying to make is, Haynes hasn't done well enough at Lb yet, so people want to see him at LM, but he still hasn't proven that he's good enough yet at left back yet, so switching him to the RW where he has never played before, doesn't seem like that the smartest idea does it. He's played his entire life as a left back and he hasn't consistently done that in the first team yet, doubt he is going to do very well at RW
And for the record, in all competitions Haynes has 24 clean sheets in 54 gamesWell considering it's a defenders job to defend not score goals not sure why that's a good way to judge a left back?
Stokes is clearly the better right back.
He's been around for 5 years and made 67 appearances.
I believe the point SW88 is trying to make is, Haynes hasn't done well enough at Lb yet, so people want to see him at LM, but he still hasn't proven that he's good enough yet at left back yet, so switching him to the RW where he has never played before, doesn't seem like that the smartest idea does it. He's played his entire life as a left back and he hasn't consistently done that in the first team yet, doubt he is going to do very well at RW
Better off without players like Reid / Turnbull who didn't want to be here and thought they were better than they are!
As for Haynes, I can't see him ever getting rid of his marmite label; also can't see where he will fit in? Stokes is the no.1 LB, and even if some fans got their wish and he was tried at LM, he would never make a RM and that would stop us using the tactic of switching the two wide players, so reckon he won't feature much once he's recovered from injury
#confused!!!!
People are saying he's not good enough defending to play LB. I agree and think he is better going forward (hence why I'm stating his attacking stats). And IF he can play more advanced at left wing, then surely he can switch sides and play RW??? Same position doing the same job, just one crosses left to right and on right to left!
So AGAIN...... Why couldn't he play on the right? If he could play on the left?!?!
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
You can't say "that's not how it works" and leave it at that!! C'mon then, enlighten me! How exactly does it work?? If he can play LW, why can't he play RW??Yes but you are comparing an attacking Left back with a defensive Left back so again not a fair comparison.
Well no that's not quite how it works, is it? You clearly have a very basic view of football.
And I didn't realise one defender made all the difference to clean sheet record?
One defender doesn't make the difference in a clean sheet, it's a team effort. But I put forward their attacking stats and that wasn't a fair test in your eyes as "they're defenders and shouldn't be compared on goals" so I've compared them on defending stats! One has more clean sheets even after playing fewer games! What more can I say.Yes but you are comparing an attacking Left back with a defensive Left back so again not a fair comparison.
Well no that's not quite how it works, is it? You clearly have a very basic view of football.
And I didn't realise one defender made all the difference to clean sheet record?
Reed turned up for 3 or 4 games last season, and threw a paddy about a "gentleman's agreement" he had to leave! Obviously looking to leave for club in League 1, or on the hunt for more wages
Should we bring back Kyle Reid from his loan?
Where is Ryan Haynes?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?