Until starmer shuts free speech down then you wont be able to say fck allSo mark clattenberg has just said they will be trying to use social media more to explain more to fan's in the first instance!
What I don't get is why all the bodies use it when it's a cesspit,put it on WhatsApp please or something!
Until starmer shuts free speech down then you wont be able to say fck all
Jesus Christ.Until starmer shuts free speech down then you wont be able to say fck all
Hmm just the o to organ grinder TBF!Until starmer shuts free speech down then you wont be able to say fck all
Until starmer shuts free speech down...
One of my friends is spouting it all day every day
Not to go off topic, but I think my favourite comment online was from an American saying how sad it is that the UK doesn't have a Bill of Rights like the US to protect its freedom of speech.One of my friends is spouting it all day every day
Lost 2-0.Which channels on with Burroughs new team in the Uefa group
Watching Notts County tonight shit officials ,County's 2nd goal
Jon Stead’s goal for them shouldn’t have stood either to be fair.Comes around…. Remember when they had a perfectly good equaliser chalked off in a play off semi only to then concede another goal that had not one but two offside offences not given?
Does it protect free speech? It doesn’t feel like it.Not to go off topic, but I think my favourite comment online was from an American saying how sad it is that the UK doesn't have a Bill of Rights like the US to protect its freedom of speech.
The UK of course does have a Bill of Rights, 100 years older than the US Bill of Rights, and the US literally used it as one of its models...
What is it you feel you can't say ?D
Does it protect free speech? It doesn’t feel like it.
I can’t say it.What is it you feel you can't say ?
How about that!I can’t say it.
Free speech doesn't exist here(EU) or in many countries including the US whatever their bill of rights say. We live in a digital prison. Ok rant over.D
Does it protect free speech? It doesn’t feel like it.
No different to China is it?Free speech doesn't exist here(EU) or in many countries including the US whatever their bill of rights say. We live in a digital prison. Ok rant over.
You have the right to free speech up to a certain point, but you don't have the right to incite violence by what you say, nor can you say things that are untrue that could cause harm (physical or otherwise eg Joey Barton/Jeremy Vine), but you don't have the right to murder or steal someone's property either.Free speech doesn't exist here(EU) or in many countries including the US whatever their bill of rights say. We live in a digital prison. Ok rant over.
If there is a “certain point“ involved, then by definition it isn’t free speech.
Having limits is fine but it isn’t free speech. Libel / slander is wrong, incitement to violence is wrong. The definition of the “certain points” just seems to be contracting. You see people like JK Rowling pilloried for her opinions on what constitutes a woman, including by those ingrates whose fame and fortune rest entirely on her works. Christians have been imprisoned for expressing views entirely consistent with their faith, others‘ sensibilities being viewed as more important than theirs. That is not free speech.You do realise that would mean someone could go around telling a load of inflammatory lies about you to everyone you know? And you would have no recourse to protect yourself.
Having limits is fine but it isn’t free speech. Libel / slander is wrong, incitement to violence is wrong. The definition of the “certain points” just seems to be contracting. You see people like JK Rowling pilloried for her opinions on what constitutes a woman, including by those ingrates whose fame and fortune rest entirely on her works. Christians have been imprisoned for expressing views entirely consistent with their faith, others‘ sensibilities being viewed as more important than theirs. That is not free speech.
Vanishingly small minorities are dictating what is, and what is not, acceptable behaviour and what can be said without fear of retribution.
China s any interesting place I've been a few times was nd my son has moved there . The West lectures China and Co about human rights while our leaders ignore our own hypocrisy and mass surveillance.No different to China is it?
They conceded 2 goals after he was taken off!Lost 2-0.
JK Rowling is expressing free speech. Those pillorying her are also expressing free speech by way of reply. Not sure this makes the point you think. Free speech doesn't give you the right to those words being accepted. It doesn't mean that you cannot be criticised for those words.Having limits is fine but it isn’t free speech. Libel / slander is wrong, incitement to violence is wrong. The definition of the “certain points” just seems to be contracting. You see people like JK Rowling pilloried for her opinions on what constitutes a woman, including by those ingrates whose fame and fortune rest entirely on her works. Christians have been imprisoned for expressing views entirely consistent with their faith, others‘ sensibilities being viewed as more important than theirs. That is not free speech.
Vanishingly small minorities are dictating what is, and what is not, acceptable behaviour and what can be said without fear of retribution.
JK Rowling is expressing free speech. Those pillorying her are also expressing free speech by way of reply. Not sure this makes the point you think. Free speech doesn't give you the right to those words being accepted. It doesn't mean that you cannot be criticised for those words.
There will always be limits to what you can say when they cross into criminal acts. It's not so much the words but the actions that were related that people were punished for (rightly or wrongly). If you go online and suggest to people to smash up a hotel, then said hotel gets smashed up, you have played a part in that act.
Just seen the replay of bristols goal, how is their player between Dovins legs not interfering with play, if not a foul on Dovin, he’s got no chance of jumping to save that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?