Otis
Well-Known Member
Atari? Is it all just a game to you?
Atari? Is it all just a game to you?Must admit in Jan I’d seriously be considering trying to offload O’Hare and Atari to free up wages to reinvest in midfield. O’Hare has obvious quality but just doesn’t play enough.
This is why you have to give players time
Is Kitching still pointless and Thomas w*nk?
Fair play to you as well mate , you always concede when you've made a bad callFair play. Usually id think of some witty retort but i like you Otis
The answer to your question is no, Thomas and Kitching as a pairing in a 2 look miles better
Yup. We should make him an MP. Would make politics so much more interestingFair play to you as well mate , you always concede when you've made a bad call
I think I’m on the spectrum.Atari? Is it all just a game to you?
You have to give players time. Been shown time and time again and you only have to throw up the examples of Adebola, Turner and McGoldrick to prove why.Still think next season is when this team shows its full worth..
Some of the dismissing of Kitching is very amusing.
Thomas too. Both are looking very good right now.
The summer recruitment campaign is starting to look so much better.
In January we need another midfielder for sure. We are a bit thin on the ground and Ayari, unfortunately, has so far failed and looks a bit lightweight. We need to strengthen there. Palmer and Kelly are far too injury prone.
I think I’m on the spectrum.
The clutching at straws is already getting very tedious .The bedwetting from the usual negative posters is going to look very silly in a few months.
The clutching at straws is already getting very tedious .
Didn't think he was particularly outstanding last night . His delivery from set pieces was good . I think it is more having a settled team and formationWe’ve won two games - and mainly as we’ve bought back a left back robins tried to shove out the door last season.
In fairness the system change has got us 3 clean sheets and 7 pointsWe’ve won two games - and mainly as we’ve bought back a left back robins tried to shove out the door last season.
Just a troll at this point, add posts like this to the clear fact they have a personal axe to grind with the owner you can disregard anything they post
This is why you have to give players time
Is Kitching still pointless and Thomas w*nk?
People are always saying Robins should have alternatives anyway. Wouldn't be surprised to see five at the back make a return at some stage, but he has always shown himself pragmatic enough to change if it's needed. He did it in League One after all.In fairness the system change has got us 3 clean sheets and 7 points
God i hope it doesn't return, not with this group of players anyway.People are always saying Robins should have alternatives anyway. Wouldn't be surprised to see five at the back make a return at some stage, but he has always shown himself pragmatic enough to change if it's needed. He did it in League One after all.
God i hope it doesn't return, not with this group of players anyway.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
God i hope it doesn't return, not with this group of players anyway.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Fair play to you as well mate , you always concede when you've made a bad call
Unsure where the “Hamer box to box” replacement fits in in this 4 back set up.People are always saying Robins should have alternatives anyway. Wouldn't be surprised to see five at the back make a return at some stage, but he has always shown himself pragmatic enough to change if it's needed. He did it in League One after all.
The creative player slots in where Eccles is all day of the week. Eccles is similar to sheaf we don’t need two of himUnsure where the “Hamer box to box” replacement fits in in this 4 back set up.
Eccles and Sheaf are doing fine sitting deep but to be fair they are getting in the box regularly.
Sims for Godden could work and I think a fitter O’Hare on the left of attack in place of Wright would give us more energy in the press and pull defences about more.
Haji scored - kudos to him - and can cause problems but I think O’Hare would bring more to the team in terms of being able to trap a ball and give and go.
Tats on the right is working.
Rotate Sims and Wright in the centre.
We have options at least.
The creative player slots in where Eccles is all day of the week. Eccles is similar to sheaf we don’t need two of him
Do you think O'Hare would score as many goals as Wright?Unsure where the “Hamer box to box” replacement fits in in this 4 back set up.
Eccles and Sheaf are doing fine sitting deep but to be fair they are getting in the box regularly.
Sims for Godden could work and I think a fitter O’Hare on the left of attack in place of Wright would give us more energy in the press and pull defences about more.
Haji scored - kudos to him - and can cause problems but I think O’Hare would bring more to the team in terms of being able to trap a ball and give and go.
Tats on the right is working.
Rotate Sims and Wright in the centre.
We have options at least.
Thought this was worth revisiting.
4 of the 5 at the back are new signings this season, where we spent money. I think the defence is starting to look as solid as last season. I'd say that's good recruitment.
Obviously Sakamoto is starting to look very good. Simms has time to grow into a good investment. Wright is the elephant in the room, but his goal/assist contribution come the end of the season will tell the true story.
O’Hare would create more chances for others I think and it’s whether playing him means better results on the whole.Do you think O'Hare would score as many goals as Wright?
He’s not even impacting the game from off the bench since coming back, don’t know how we’d possibly be better off if he started.O’Hare would create more chances for others I think and it’s whether playing him means better results on the whole.
My personal presumption (and that’s all it is) is that O’Hare roaming wide left, Tats on Right and Sims in the middle is a better proposition.
O’Hare didn’t look good at all on the wing when he came on last night, positionally confused and misplayed/timed multiple passes.O’Hare would create more chances for others I think and it’s whether playing him means better results on the whole.
My personal presumption (and that’s all it is) is that O’Hare roaming wide left, Tats on Right and Sims in the middle is a better proposition.
O’Hare didn’t look good at all on the wing when he came on last night, positionally confused and misplayed/timed multiple passes.
More training needed if he’s going to play there I think. He may be better challenging Allen for the more adventurous position in the midfield 3.
Maybe, but I’d like to see him being able to jink in and roam rather than an all out wide man.O’Hare didn’t look good at all on the wing when he came on last night, positionally confused and misplayed/timed multiple passes.
More training needed if he’s going to play there I think. He may be better challenging Allen for the more adventurous position in the midfield 3.
Maybe, but I’d like to see him being able to jink in and roam rather than an all out wide man.
With Sheaf and Eccles sitting, the Full backs can get forward like they have of late. O’Hare cutting in and roaming is what I’m thinking.
Anyway, I’m not MR - I just like the idea of a fully fit O’Hare menacing the opposition and although Haji has his good points it’s still fresh in my mind how we picked up last season when O’Hare came in.
It would help if you didn't give any of our players vile abuse in the first place though. Fair enough to make constructive criticism and then eat humble pie. But as a supporter, calling one of our players a useless c**t just isn't right.Have too i feel, if im wrong im wrong id rather own it than look a prick trying to defend it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?