Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Ratings (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Sky Blue Pete
  • Start date May 8, 2023
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #36
It was nervy though, in a weird way play off match will be less nervy. Listen to the crowd cheering or sighing when goals were going in at other games even though it was irrelevant as long as we drew. There was such a fear that despite being nigh on impossible, we were going to 'do a cov city'

At least play off game there's no other distractions, the crowd are invested fully, as are the players. If that makes sense.
 
Reactions: clint van damme, MTK and shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #37
slowpoke said:
You did notice from the off the tactic was long ball from the back including from Wilson, BNC had a few sorties down the right but not a lot, that was always going to surrender midfield possession, we even had chances to increase our lead, it worked until we had that minute of madness on half-time, at the time I blamed Eccles but it was 100% Hamer.
This was an eight out of ten performance from all in what must have been the most nervy game most had played in.
Click to expand...

I think we overdid it a bit second half due to nerves. You could see Robins wanted them out a bit further. Always been an issue with this team a tendency to drop back and try and protect what they have.
 
Reactions: stupot07

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #38
Esoterica said:
I still remember Kelly getting slated after the defeat away at Forest Green Rovers in Feb 2018. He went off injured in the same match that Jodi Jones did his first ACL and didn’t play for 10 weeks after. He got absolutely slated in his first match back, that FGR game, while people were loving Doyle for shouting at the referee twice, despite not moving from the centre circle all game.

Anyway, Kelly has always needed time to get his match sharpness. In all divisions he’s played for us in. Think people forgot that after the Wrexham game. Been a superb captain since he came back in to the team.
Click to expand...
You wouldn't have thought with his energy levels that he was the old man of the two sides' midfield, was everywhere yesterday. I also think that he does use the ball better when he's fitter and has got a bit more confidence.
 
Reactions: steve101

SkyBlueSoul

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #39
One of the best hangovers I've had, solid 8/10
 
Reactions: clint van damme

Calista

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #40
Boosh said:
Godden who set up our goal
Click to expand...
There's no emoji for this
 

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #41
fernandopartridge said:
You wouldn't have thought with his energy levels that he was the old man of the two sides' midfield, was everywhere yesterday. I also think that he does use the ball better when he's fitter and has got a bit more confidence.
Click to expand...
He's 'only' 33. That said, I do think 3 central midfielders has played a significant part in his recent success. Not sure if he could play in 2 man central midfield at this level still. I think his biggest issue though, like Godden, is staying fit for an extended period of time.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Offhegoes

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #42
It's clear Godden is a 'doing a job' for the team in the absence of O'Hare & Palmer. He would be better as the lone striker or in a 2 with a natural no 10 to provide chances for him. In this system he's supporting Vik, and having to do stuff that is not his natural game. Clearly Robins doesn't think McGuire or Walker are up to the task. Godden has done OK and still managed to find the net despite being quiet in almost all the games. Even if Robins did revert to a 5 man midfield it would be Allen playing furthest forward which again isn't really his position. A shame McGuire wasn't up to standard as that would of given us plenty of options recently.
If we go up and keep Vik, Godden will be used more off the bench I think. Robins won't play 2 up front in the Premier League. Hopefully we'll have O'Hare & Palmer supporting Vik.
 
Reactions: rob9872, steve101 and Sky Blue Pete

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #43
shmmeee said:
I think we overdid it a bit second half due to nerves. You could see Robins wanted them out a bit further. Always been an issue with this team a tendency to drop back and try and protect what they have.
Click to expand...
Definitely, we were very scared of their pace. And went so deep to try and deny them space behind. But we ended up giving them too much space and time on the ball.


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #44
shmmeee said:
Gonna get pelters here but didn’t think we were great, particularly down our right defensively and in midfield where we dropped far too deep and didn’t use the ball well enough. I suspect if we played like that on Sunday we’d get a pasting. We looked nervy.

Thought Vik looked good, Godden anonymous. Kelly very good for when we’re holding onto the game, but felt his use of the ball put us under a lot of pressure. His nightly fouls were appreciated in the middle though. Eccles didn’t seem to impact as much. Hamer was Hamer. Bidwell was solid as every but BNC defensively looked dodgy every time the attacked down that side. And I think it was his man for the goal?

Centre backs were generally good and Wilson was fine.

Probably 8s for Vik and Hamer, 6 for Godden and Cuffy and 7s for everyone else? Even that might be a bit generous TBH.
Click to expand...

I agree, we were pretty poor, but did enough to get a point. We can't afford to play that badly and concede that much possession, territory and space over 2 legs. An improvement is needed.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #45
stupot07 said:
I agree, we were pretty poor, but did enough to get a point. We can't afford to play that badly and concede that much possession, territory and space over 2 legs. An improvement is needed.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I think you are really exaggerating - we did what we needed to do and were more than good for the point if not all 3.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 9744
S

SheafIsGod

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #46
Eccles: L0L
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #47
It's flying under the radar a bit, but without Godden we're not in the Playoffs for me. His work pressing is outstanding. His hold up play has improved. He's still popping up where a striker should be when he needs to but not getting found as often as he should. Thankless tasks. Genuinely think he's developed as a footballer over the last few months which at his age, with his skillset, is incredible. Credit to him and the coaching team.
 
Reactions: PVA, Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and Sky Blue Pete
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #48
Offhegoes said:
It's clear Godden is a 'doing a job' for the team in the absence of O'Hare & Palmer. He would be better as the lone striker or in a 2 with a natural no 10 to provide chances for him. In this system he's supporting Vik, and having to do stuff that is not his natural game. Clearly Robins doesn't think McGuire or Walker are up to the task. Godden has done OK and still managed to find the net despite being quiet in almost all the games. Even if Robins did revert to a 5 man midfield it would be Allen playing furthest forward which again isn't really his position. A shame McGuire wasn't up to standard as that would of given us plenty of options recently.
If we go up and keep Vik, Godden will be used more off the bench I think. Robins won't play 2 up front in the Premier League. Hopefully we'll have O'Hare & Palmer supporting Vik.
Click to expand...
Would you have Palmer and O'Hare ahead of Hamer in the attacking midfield role, assuming we can hold on to him. Hamer would be my number one alongside either of the other two.
 
Reactions: Boosh and Earlsdon_Skyblue1

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #49
steve101 said:
Would you have Palmer and O'Hare ahead of Hamer in the attacking midfield role, assuming we can hold on to him. Hamer would be my number one alongside either of the other two.
Click to expand...

Not necessarily, but I wouldn’t have Hamer. It’s rarer to find a CM like Hamer than any AM who can produce. Hamer and Sheaf are a good base pairing with a lot of experience together.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #50
steve101 said:
Would you have Palmer and O'Hare ahead of Hamer in the attacking midfield role, assuming we can hold on to him. Hamer would be my number one alongside either of the other two.
Click to expand...
It's a great problem to have.

I think it depends if we're playing two strikers or one.

Two strikers I'd go for Sheaf and Eccles either side of Hamer.

One I'd go for Sheaf and Hamer behind O'Hare and Palmer. And then you'd still have Eccles/Kelly to bring in in the deeper role and Allen in the more attacking ones. Would have no problem with Eccles sitting beside Sheaf so Hamer can push up next to O'Hare, or indeed Allen alongside O'Hare as the energy in the press would be fantastic.
 
Reactions: steve101

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #51
In general terms, if you play 3 in midfield, you have a creative 10, a sitter, and a guy who goes box to box. The box to box role ticks all of Hamer’s boxes. I think he’d score 12 goals if given the freedom in a full season.
 
Reactions: steve101 and Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • May 9, 2023
  • #52
Esoterica said:
In general terms, if you play 3 in midfield, you have a creative 10, a sitter, and a guy who goes box to box. The box to box role ticks all of Hamer’s boxes. I think he’d score 12 goals if given the freedom in a full season.
Click to expand...
So pleased we get to see Hamer and vik for a couple more games at least
 
Reactions: Esoterica and shmmeee
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?