Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Ratings (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Apr 6, 2022
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #1
Dabo proved me wrong and motm. Out of the game when he moved.

Everybody else shit.
 
Reactions: Covskyblue and TwistAndShoutCCFC1987

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #2
Yes I'd agree dabo motm
 
Reactions: Bernie Rhodes Nose and Covskyblue

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #3
Moore - 5

Dabo - 8 - brilliant defensively. Won pretty much every duel.

Rose - 5

Hyam - 5

Bidwell - 5

Kane - 5

Allen - 5

Hamer - 7

Sheaf - 5.5

O’Hare - 5 - most am’s in the league take one of the two good chances he had tonight)

Gyok - 6 - had to carve out a lot for himself.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #4
harvey098 said:
Moore - 5

Dabo - 8 - brilliant defensively. Won pretty much every duel.

Rose - 5

Hyam - 5

Bidwell - 5

Kane - 5

Allen - 5

Hamer - 7

Sheaf - 5.5

O’Hare - 5 - most am’s in the league take one of the two good chances he had tonight)

Gyok - 6 - had to carve out a lot for himself.
Click to expand...

hamer was dire
 
Reactions: eastwoodsdustman

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #5
Moore - 4
Kane - 5
Hyam - 4
Rose - 4
Bidwell - 6
Dabo - 7
Hamer - 5
Sheaf - 5
Allen - 5
O’Hare - 5
Gyokeres - 6
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #6
Moore - 5
Hyam - 5
Rose - 4
Bidwell - 7
Kane - 6
Hamer - 6
Sheaf - 6
Dabo - 8
Allen - 5
O’Hare - 5
Györkeres- 6

Howley - 4
Maatsen - 5
Tavares - 4
 
Reactions: GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee, Sky Blue Pete and bulko

Blind-Faith

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #7
Moore 6
Dabo 7 motm
Bidwell 6
Rose 4
Hyam 5
Kane 5
Sheaf 5
Hamer 6
Allen 5
Ohare 4
Vik 6

That was bloody awful
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #8
Grendel said:
hamer was dire
Click to expand...

Thought you’d only have negatives to say. How about “Dabo did well”.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and Deleted member 9744

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #9
harvey098 said:
Thought you’d only have negatives to say. How about “Dabo did well”.
Click to expand...

you rated him far too high. He had a ooor game.
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #10
Grendel said:
you rated him far too high. He had a ooor game.
Click to expand...
Assume (hope) you’re still talking about Hamer and not Dabo. He was comfortably a 7.. if we win or get a draw he’d get a 7 without question there. It’s only because we lost it clouds judgement. He was a class above again and probably the only player on the pitch that can create that chance he did for O’Hare who took way too long and fluffed it.
 
Reactions: eastwoodsdustman, tommy hutch legend and Becksy
T

trakia plovdiv

Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #11
Grendel said:
you rated him far too high. He had a ooor game.
Click to expand...
Ha ha ha ha bonk (*dies laughing)
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #12
harvey098 said:
Assume (hope) you’re still talking about Hamer and not Dabo. He was comfortably a 7.. if we win or get a draw he’d get a 7 without question there. It’s only because we lost it clouds judgement. He was a class above again and probably the only player on the pitch that can create that chance he did for O’Hare who took way too long and fluffed it.
Click to expand...

no one else agrees with you on hamer
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #13
Grendel said:
no one else agrees with you on hamer
Click to expand...

No one else agrees with you on most things so I wouldn’t take that line of argument if I were you
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, Frostie, montydon87 and 6 others

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #14
Were we really that bad tonight?! I thought we did quite well against a very good side at this level.
 
Reactions: LilleSkyBlue, Suffolkskyblue, Sky Blue Harry H and 6 others

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #15
harvey098 said:
Moore - 5

Dabo - 8 - brilliant defensively. Won pretty much every duel.

Rose - 5

Hyam - 5

Bidwell - 5

Kane - 5

Allen - 5

Hamer - 7

Sheaf - 5.5

O’Hare - 5 - most am’s in the league take one of the two good chances he had tonight)

Gyok - 6 - had to carve out a lot for himself.
Click to expand...

Bidwell 5 is extremely harsh
 
Reactions: Bernie Rhodes Nose, Dimi_Konstantflapalot and bulko
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #16
Moore 6
Kane 6
Dabo 7
Hyam 6
Rose 5
Bidwell 6
Sheaf 4
Hamer 7
Allen 5
O'Hare 7
Gyokeres 7
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #17
Grendel said:
no one else agrees with you on hamer
Click to expand...
I agree with him
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #18
Ccfcisparks said:
Bidwell 5 is extremely harsh
Click to expand...

he was one of the better players
 
Reactions: bulko and Ccfcisparks

ccfc_Tom

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #19
Dabo and gyok were the stand out players. Shame their first goal went in, was pretty even game up to that point.
 
Reactions: bulko

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #20
Grendel said:
he was one of the better players
Click to expand...
Agreed. Thought him and Dabo did alright against their 2 danger men
 
Reactions: Bernie Rhodes Nose
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #21
Terry_dactyl said:
Were we really that bad tonight?! I thought we did quite well against a very good side at this level.
Click to expand...
A few players were really poor, but most were ok. Things didn't always come off for O'Hare, Hamer and Gyokeres but at least there was hope when they were involved.
 
Reactions: Bernie Rhodes Nose
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #22
Moore 6 (thought he could have been more decisive at times but don't really think he could have kept out both goals)

Kane 6 (a couple of decent interchanges and one good piece of cover play but otherwise mediocre)

Hyam 5 (2 good blocks, particularly the one in 1st half but totally bullied by Davis)

Rose 5 (some dire passes but did improve as game went on)

Bidwell 8 (another solid performance)

Dabo 8 motm (defended very well against a very good player)

Sheaf 6 (best hit shot from us. Some decent moments but generally quiet)

Hamer 5 (most ineffective game for a while. Nice pass to O'Hare though late on)

Allen 5 (passing not up to usual standard. Should have scored)

O'Hare 4 (one decent pass to Gyokeres but nearly every other time he lost the ball through bad control or passing. Should have scored at least 2)

Gyokeres 6 (held the ball up really well but thankless job when those around weren't able to make use of it. Missed good early chance)

Tavares 5 (doesn't look comfortable when the ball isn't played to feet. One nice piece of skill, which Maatsen squandered)

Maatsen 4 (looked disinterested to me. Didn't see anything constructive)

Howley 4 (looked really nervous and some poor first touches didn't help. He kept showing for the ball though)
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #23
steve101 said:
Moore 6 (thought he could have been more decisive at times but don't really think he could have kept out both goals)

Kane 6 (a couple of decent interchanges and one good piece of cover play but otherwise mediocre)

Hyam 5 (2 good blocks, particularly the one in 1st half but totally bullied by Davis)

Rose 5 (some dire passes but did improve as game went on)

Bidwell 8 (another solid performance)

Dabo 8 motm (defended very well against a very good player)

Sheaf 6 (best hit shot from us. Some decent moments but generally quiet)

Hamer 5 (most ineffective game for a while. Nice pass to O'Hare though late on)

Allen 5 (passing not up to usual standard. Should have scored)

O'Hare 4 (one decent pass to Gyokeres but nearly every other time he lost the ball through bad control or passing. Should have scored at least 2)

Gyokeres 6 (held the ball up really well but thankless job when those around weren't able to make use of it. Missed good early chance)

Tavares 5 (doesn't look comfortable when the ball isn't played to feet. One nice piece of skill, which Maatsen squandered)

Maatsen 4 (looked disinterested to me. Didn't see anything constructive)

Howley 4 (looked really nervous and some poor first touches didn't help. He kept showing for the ball though)
Click to expand...
Think they are fair ratings but is probably put O’Hare up to a 6
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #24
Ccfcisparks said:
Bidwell 5 is extremely harsh
Click to expand...

Really? (I gave him MOTM in the last ratings thread btw so no vendetta)

Was at fault for our first when he could’ve just knocked out for a corner, passing was poor (he literally just panicked and booted it down the line to no one about 3-4 times) and the whole defence was run ragged by Davis, understandbly so - he looks a player.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #25
Moore 5
Hyam 5
Rose 5
Bidwell 6
Dabo 7
Kane 5
Hamer 6
Sheaf 6
Allen 6
O'Hare 6
Gyokeres 6

Subs
Tavares 5
Maatsen 5
Howley 5

We've played a lot lot worse than that but two mistakes from the centre backs didn't help our cause.

Ultimately we just do not have the squad depth of quality to sustain a push and losing a key player like McFadz at this point has been disastrous
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #26
harvey098 said:
Really? (I gave him MOTM in the last ratings thread btw so no vendetta)

Was at fault for our first when he could’ve just knocked out for a corner, passing was poor (he literally just panicked and booted it down the line to no one about 3-4 times) and the whole defence was run ragged by Davis, understandbly so - he looks a player.
Click to expand...

Yeah think you must have watched a different game to me. Davis played off Hyam Mainly and Bidwell was tasked with Johnson and Spence and did very well
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #27
Ccfcisparks said:
Agreed. Thought him and Dabo did alright against their 2 danger men
Click to expand...

dabo is better when defending
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #28
Ccfcisparks said:
Yeah think you must have watched a different game to me. Davis played off Hyam Mainly and Bidwell was tasked with Johnson and Spence and did very well
Click to expand...
He and Johnson interchanged. Whole defence bar Dabo were poor tonight and Bidwell literally cost us the first goal with some comical defending.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #29
harvey098 said:
He and Johnson interchanged. Whole defence bar Dabo were poor tonight and Bidwell literally cost us the first goal with some comical defending.
Click to expand...
Yeah you’re wrong IMO, and it seems people agree with me
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #30
O'Hare was poor but comparing him to other attacking midfielders who are on, in most cases 20-30k a week isn't worth doing. We know where he's at, and we know he doesn't score goals. Same with Allen. A goalscoring attacking midfielder is the aim in the summer but we won't be able to afford one.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #31
Always been a fan of Sheaf but he was abysmal tonight.
 

harvey098

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #32
Ccfcisparks said:
Yeah you’re wrong IMO, and it seems people agree with me
Click to expand...


 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #33
Moore 6
Kane 6
Hyam 5
Rose 5
Bidwell 7
Dabo 8 motm
Hamer 4
Sheaf 5
Allen 6
O'hare 5
Gyokeres 6

Subs
Maatsen 5
Taveres 4
Howley 3

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #34
Moore 6

Rose 5
Hyam 6
Bidwell 6 Has been much more impressive as a LCB

Dabo 6 MOTM
Sheaf 6
Hamer 6 One of his irritating performances where he’s clearly overplaying
Kane 6

Allen 5
O’Hare 6 Very unlucky not to score

Gyokeres 6 Some moments of absolute magic followed by the usual crap finishing

Maatsen 5
Tavares 5 Would be amazed (and at this stage disappointed) if he’s one of our striking options next year
Howley 5 A textbook example of why just throwing the kids on doesn’t always work
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 6, 2022
  • #35
SBT said:
Moore 6

Rose 5
Hyam 6
Bidwell 6 Has been much more impressive as a LCB

Dabo 6 MOTM
Sheaf 6
Hamer 6 One of his irritating performances where he’s clearly overplaying
Kane 6

Allen 5
O’Hare 6 Very unlucky not to score

Gyokeres 6 Some moments of absolute magic followed by the usual crap finishing

Maatsen 5
Tavares 5 Would be amazed (and at this stage disappointed) if he’s one of our striking options next year
Howley 5 A textbook example of why just throwing the kids on doesn’t always work
Click to expand...
Hyam the same as Dabo really
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?