Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Ratings (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Dec 11, 2021
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #71
Moore 7 one great save and one dodgy punch
Kane 8
Hyam 8
Mcfadzean 7
Rose 7
Dabo 6
Kelly 7
Sheaf 6
Allen 8
Ohare 5
Godden 8
 
Reactions: Sick Boy

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #72
Moore 6
Hyam 7
Fadz 7
Rose 7
Kane 9 motm
Dabo 6
Sheaf 9
Kelly 6
O'hare 5
Allen 8
Godden 7 (bonus point for the goal)

Subs
Walker 6
Maatsen 7
Jones 7

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #73
OldBedrocker said:
Taking Sheaf off instead of Kelly was an odd call
Click to expand...
Surely it must have been fitness related? Sheaf was the best player up until then
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #74
Evo1883 said:
There's no balance though really , kane caught very flat footed for the first ... but we brush that aside because he generally played well and was one of the better performers tbh .. if it was dabo on the left , well ... we know what happens
Click to expand...
It confirmation bias. At the moment Dabo, O'Hare and Godden are the victims
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #75
Evo1883 said:
There's no balance though really , kane caught very flat footed for the first ... but we brush that aside because he generally played well and was one of the better performers tbh .. if it was dabo on the left , well ... we know what happens
Click to expand...
Kane was having to tuck in and mark the striker in the build up which is why he couldn't get out to toffolo. It was not the case he was flat footed at all.



Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #76
Moore 6
Kane 8
Dabo 6
Hyam 8
McFadzean 8
Rose 8
Kelly 6
Sheaf 8
Allen 8 motm
O'Hare 5
Godden 7

Maatsen 7
Walker 6
Jones 7
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #77
stupot07 said:
Kane was having to tuck in and mark the striker in the build up which is why he couldn't get out to toffolo. It was not the case he was flat footed at all.



Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Fair point looked slightly different in real time
 
Reactions: stupot07

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #78
However we view it , there's a fans forum very impressed with our team (huddersfield ), how we play football and fully appreciate we were unlucky not to win ..

I do think it felt footballing wise like our best 90 of the season , I wish we had won so we could really appreciate that effort properly from the team
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981, CCFCSteve, Cov kid 55 and 1 other person
T

tommy hutch legend

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #79
steve101 said:
Moore 6
Kane 8
Dabo 6
Hyam 8
McFadzean 8
Rose 8
Kelly 6
Sheaf 8
Allen 8 motm
O'Hare 5
Godden 7

Maatsen 7
Walker 6
Jones 7
Click to expand...
agree with them ratings
 
L

Littlewood CCFC

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #80
Ccfcisparks said:
Yes
Click to expand...

That sparks guy always spits his dummy out on here
 

Malaka

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #81
Moore - 7 Stupid punch out
Kane - 8 Lovely to watch someone take on their man, put good ball in
Hyam - 7 Solid
McFadz - 7 Solid
Rose -7 Not a fan but liked him today
Dabo - 4 I love Fanky, but he was shite today
Sheaf - 7 Developing nicely, due a screamer
Kelly - 5 Can't keep up
Allen - 8 Awesome MOM
O’Hare - 5 Can't believe I'm rating him at five, turns a man well but then what?
Godden - 7 Great first half, did nothing second half except score

Jones -7 Great ball in for the goal
Maatsen - 7 I like this lad, looked confident, good move to bench him today
Walker - 5 Is it me or is he lazy ?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #82
stupot07 said:
Moore 6
Hyam 7
Fadz 7
Rose 7
Kane 9 motm
Dabo 6
Sheaf 9
Kelly 6
O'hare 5
Allen 8
Godden 7 (bonus point for the goal)

Subs
Walker 6
Maatsen 7
Jones 7

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
O'Hare 5 is ludicrous
 
Reactions: Sick Boy and Deleted member 9744

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #83
I thought Godden had faded out of the game 2nd half and offered nothing but once again he pops up with a goal and up goes his rating which I guess thats what he's paid for but I do wish he would at least worry the oppositions defence more when he's not scoring
 
C

covboy9

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #84
Moore 7
Kane 8 impressive
Dabo 6 offers nothing at lwb
Rose 7 great distribution
Hyam 7 solid, shudda scored
Mcfad 7 usual
Kelly 7 harshly treated by some on here
Sheaf 7 growing
Allen 8 great energy
Ohare 6
Godden 7 tireless effort

thought we were excellent but lack clinical finishing and pace in final third

made hudds look a pub side most of the game 2 pts dropped
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #85
fernandopartridge said:
O'Hare 5 is ludicrous
Click to expand...
Too high?
 
Reactions: Blind-Faith, stupot07, Garryb80 and 1 other person

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #86
Don't bemoan Godden guys, blame Robins. One up top he doesn't hold it up and has no pace. Personally not a fan of one striker, but if we have to then it has to be Gyo for that role.
 

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #87
Jones really put his hand up for more game time with the impact he made today.
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981 and shmmeee
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #88
rob9872 said:
Don't bemoan Godden guys, blame Robins. One up top he doesn't hold it up and has no pace. Personally not a fan of one striker, but if we have to then it has to be Gyo for that role.
Click to expand...
I'm guessing he's not fully fit, and it's taking him out the firing line a bit.

Fair to say even though Godden wasn't great, he still got a goal again, and offered an option in and around their penalty area, so I don't think he was a total disaster up front by himself.
 
G

Garryb80

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #89
fernandopartridge said:
O'Hare 5 is ludicrous
Click to expand...
It's too generous if anything
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #90
Jones is definitely pushing for more game time.

O’Hare has to be due a rest soon. I guess over the busy Xmas period we'll see that change at some point.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #91
rob9872 said:
Don't bemoan Godden guys, blame Robins. One up top he doesn't hold it up and has no pace. Personally not a fan of one striker, but if we have to then it has to be Gyo for that role.
Click to expand...

I think it gives us better control of midfield and is just missing a) Gyo in form to lead the line and b) the midfield getting forward quicker when we regain possession.
 
Reactions: rob9872

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 11, 2021
  • #92
Garryb80 said:
It's too generous if anything
Click to expand...
Bollocks
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #93
stupot07 said:
Beckham rarely beat his man, he was one of the best wide men in PL history. Just needed a yard, and let the quality of his delivery do the rest.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Played mostly in a 4 man midfield with a full back behind him so it's a completely different role tactically and positionally.

Kane was good today, big improvement on the west brom performance. As long as the team can create the space and crossing chances for him as today then he can consistently deliver dangerous crosses.

(some absolutely ridiculous diagonal passes from I think rose today?)
 
Reactions: stupot07
G

Garryb80

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 12, 2021
  • #94
fernandopartridge said:
Bollocks
Click to expand...

Your detailed counter argument is appreciated thanks
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?