Question?? (1 Viewer)

W

wingy

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #1

When can we expect the result of the Judicial review into the 1000 page Dossier of illegal activities carried out by CCC/ACL.

Ultimately will this card get played or is it a tool to stifle response to the oft Quoted paper trail that supports or contradicts eithers take of events re Negotiation.

The Fact that TF is now dropping heavy hints regarding dates of Board resolutions ,
specifically the 19th DEC 2003 possibly suggests impatience ,or using it as the tool it was designed to be and build the myth that it is all everyone else's fault .

 

L

lifelongcityfan

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #2

BTW..TF stated that it cost the club 100k in legal fees to have the Judicial Review!!!

 

W

wingy

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #3

lifelongcityfan said:

BTW..TF stated that it cost the club 100k in legal fees to have the Judicial Review!!!

Click to expand...

That is true and of course only the start of it if it is a serious Vehicle to try and keep control.

 

B

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #4

lifelongcityfan said:

BTW..TF stated that it cost the club 100k in legal fees to have the Judicial Review!!!

Click to expand...

So added to admin its going to be another million or so on the debtput on the club:facepalm:

 

stupot07

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #5

Illegal activities?

 

W

wingy

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #6

stupot07 said:

Illegal activities?

Click to expand...

Used Public funds to prop up a private entity ,reneged on several agreements as the paper trail shows ,conspired to defraud a bank.

 

D

diggerdaley

New Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #7

I thought Coventry City Council part owned the Ricoh with the Higgs Trust & just run by ACL :thinking about:

 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #8

Nothing illegal about that. Protecting the asset.

 

Jim

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #9

CCC secured their investment as a going concern with a change of capital investment. Absolutely nothing wrong with it and not a drain on public services as people keep bringing up. In fact would suggest in public interest to ensure prior investment not lost.

 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

• Jun 2, 2013

• #10

its all standard business practice