don't tell nick sisu are ccfc he'll do his nutThe statement below has been issued by Sisu Capital, owners of Coventry City Football Club, this afternoon:
SISU Capital can confirm that it has had neither written nor verbal communication from Mr. Evans; hence, he has not made an offer to purchase Coventry City FC.
We would expect any potential purchaser to follow a professional and confidential process. Misleading public statements are a distraction to both the Club and fans, SISU IS CCFC and thus CCFC are Taking our Landlords to court
They're not though CCFC but they are the sole shareholder. Like if you wanted to buy Asda supermarket you wouldn't ask a store manager.don't tell nick sisu are ccfc he'll do his nut
Shit, someone should tell Dale Evans that he's trying to buy sisu.don't tell nick sisu are ccfc he'll do his nut
They're not though CCFC but they are the sole shareholder. Like if you wanted to buy Asda supermarket you wouldn't ask a store manager.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
The statement below has been issued by Sisu Capital, owners of Coventry City Football Club, this afternoon:
SISU Capital can confirm that it has had neither written nor verbal communication from Mr. Evans; hence, he has not made an offer to purchase Coventry City FC.
We would expect any potential purchaser to follow a professional and confidential process. Misleading public statements are a distraction to both the Club and fans, SISU IS CCFC and thus CCFC are Taking our Landlords to court
Anybody with half a brain cell can understand it. I think people are being purposefully ignorant just to make a point.A bit misleading. The last sentence was not in the statement.
Thus Sisu are the owners /sole shareholders of ccfc, they are not ccfc. The same way the Arcadia Group are owners of Burton, Topshop, etc they are not Burton, Topshop, etc. And if you wanted to by Burtons you would still need to talk to the Arcadia Group not the head of Burtons.
In fact the Arcadia Group getting taken to court by BHS liquidators, does not equate to Burtons, Topshop, etc are being taken to court by the BHS liquidators.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
A bit misleading. The last sentence was not in the statement.
Thus Sisu are the owners /sole shareholders of ccfc, they are not ccfc. The same way the Arcadia Group are owners of Burton, Topshop, etc they are not Burton, Topshop, etc. And if you wanted to by Burtons you would still need to talk to the Arcadia Group not the head of Burtons.
In fact the Arcadia Group getting taken to court by BHS liquidators, does not equate to Burtons, Topshop, etc are being taken to court by the BHS liquidators.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Welcome to skybluestalk.This is a stupid fucking argument
No the point of the thread was to say sisu = ccfc. Ccfc = sisu. That's untrue.the point of the thread was dispel , the denial that ccfc are not part of sisu but here sisu confirm that they are , the fact that people can argue that, is mind boggling , there has been lots and lots of threads about the point , SISU
have confirmed lets move on
View attachment 8254 My head hurts what the fook is going on? Can’t get the 30 odd pages of shit arguments and the frothing at the mouth statements.
If it all settles please contact me at
Charles Hungerford
Windward house
Jersey
Channel Islands.
I will light a new cigar in anticipation. Jim Bergerac my son in law is on his way for his supper.
Pusb
So you know more of the point of the thread than me , Fair play to you , that's why people like me don't post much theses days, not only do we not agree with you ,but we don't know why ,No the point of the thread was to say sisu = ccfc. Ccfc = sisu. That's untrue.
All the statement confirms is Sisu own us. No one has ever disputed that.
TOP POST, stupot07 respect , you want to defend till the end , I want to change direction ASAP, as cov fans both right , that's footballTBH.
who actually gives a fuck if Sisu and CCFC are the same?
Just wish sisu would fuck off.
Give us back our club and let us start building again before it is too late.
PUSB
Hahahaha here we go "defending sisu" bollocks. Standard.TOP POST, stupot07 respect , you want to defend till the end , I want to change direction ASAP, as cov fans both right , that's football
You don't post much because you don't like people correcting you when you add stuff to statements or that some don't make sense?So you know more of the point of the thread than me , Fair play to you , that's why people like me don't post much theses days, not only do we not agree with you ,but we don't know why ,
So you know more of the point of the thread than me , Fair play to you , that's why people like me don't post much theses days, not only do we not agree with you ,but we don't know why ,
that's 3 statements in less than a week.
for owners who are usually so silent, that's very unusual
Not going to disprove the multiple.posters then or actually make a point relevant?You are about to go round in circles and more circles and more circles. Eventually you will have the point you were originally making changed into a different point. Then and only then, when you admit you are wrong can you leave the debate. It’s not worth it.
If you signed up to an important deal with CCFC, the top brass at SISU will say yes or no.
As a result of that deal if you get sued the top brass at SISU, will decide to sue you or not.
Long or short of it is, if you do an important deal with CCFC you are doing it with SISU.
If you sit/stand in the Ricoh singing about the villa SISU are the last thing on your mind.
Business and fans are two different things doing business with CCFC at an important level is doing business with SISU. Anyone denying that is just trying to win an argument, they can’t really believe what they are saying, surely?
Not going to disprove the multiple.posters then or actually make a point relevant?
His point was relevant. Unlike multiple posters which while we’re talking about convenient distractions seems to a good one for you.
You’ll probably be the first one to blame Dale Evans for a bad performance while ignoring the multiple distractions created by our owners for what’s been years now.
They seem more concerned about Dale Evans than they are about where we will be playing next season. If it’s a “distraction” it’s clearly welcome.
Nick
Would it possible for you to go the whole weekend without analysing other posters words or comments and allow them to post freely without fear of being analysed to death.
Just a suggestion, like !!
TBH.Nick
Would it possible for you to go the whole weekend without analysing other posters words or comments and allow them to post freely without fear of being analysed to death.
Just a suggestion, like !!
I just go by what people say and use their own words. I hadn't seen this thread until late on.I am not just referring to this post but several over the last few days. Several OPs are ruined by pages of bickering over "he said that" and "you said that"
I enjoy this board generally but in my opinion the above comment is ruining it for the majority of posters.
You have your individual style, like we all do, but just suggesting you tone it down a bit.
Have a good weekend and let's hope for 3 points today. PUSB.
Who accused of that?TBH.
What really pisses me off is that yet another poster is a accused of being a liar.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?