Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Prozone and RR (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter oldskyblue58
  • Start date Jul 19, 2012
Forums New posts

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #1
Something on a post by Brighton Sky Blue got me thinking about what it was Prozone brought to the SBS&L Group and what RR got out of being involved.

SBS&L owned the Prozone Group up until 07/06/11

We have always assumed that Prozone Group made good profits.

Well there are 4 companies in that sub Group
Prozone Group (holding company)
Prozone Sports Limited (trading company owned by Prozone Group)
Prozone Media Limited (dormant didn't trade)
Prozone Sports international Limited (dormant didn't trade)

Prozone Group has had NO trading activity in the years to 31/05 2009,2010 or 2011... so no profits there to contribute. Interestingly that company did owe £1,563,141 to SBS&L as at 31/05/11 the company and its debt were acquired on 07/06/11 by SUP SAS. That I take to mean that SUP repaid the £1.5m to SBS&L and took on the debt that Prozone Group owed themselves. The other side of this is £1,563,141 was then owed by SBS&L to Arley Group PLC (owned by RR)..... would guess this is the value of Prozone to RR when he brought it in to the party (debt matches a liability)

Prozone Sports Limited, appears to be the only trading entity. In 2009 it made £312k in 2010 £205K and in 2011 it lost £73k..... so no great positives to SBS&L there. At 31/05/11 PSL had accumulated £2m in tax losses. Which suggests it never was that profitable
At 31/05/11 PSL owed SBS&L £2.2m. That debt was also transferred to SUP on 07/06/11. I assume SBS&L received payment for this amount on the transfer
It provided £80K pa in sports analysis services to CCFC and CCFC owed PSL £93k at 31/05/11
It paid Arley Group PLC the following amounts for RR's services 2009 £69K 2010 £75k and 2011 £123k. During those same years Arley Group invoiced CCFC H for RR's services 2008 £169k 2009 £226K 2010 £228K 2011 No details given but guess at £190k

interest accrued on SBS&L debt to Arley Group (RR) 2009 £154K 2010 £156K 2011 £130k (guess because no details in 2011 accounts)

Thoughts .....

07/06/11 SBS&L shifted some debt on by transferring the PG £1.5m to someone else so that meant it either repaid Arley or SUP now owed Arley. Either way SBS&L lost an asset and an equal value liability from its balance sheet
07/06/11 it looks like SBS&L got repaid by or is owed by SUP £2.2m but it also means that of the £29.7m put into SBS&L by SISU that at least 2.2m went into PSL

RR or Arley have taken from the SBS&L Group (including CCFC) £1,080k for RR's services, £440K in interest and repaid £1.5m in just over 3 years.

Have seen it said that RR had the right idea..... but clearly he let the overheads build and losses mount. We never could have afforded to bring in the likes of Carroll, Henderson etc unless that brought immediate success which in turn enhanced the individual sell value..... that was not guaranteed and both players could have disappeared in the championship if with us.

Have seen it said that he based it on youth, maybe but it was bought in youth not from our academy. Our academy was decent enough long before he came and wasnt he considering shutting it at one point ? (might be wrong on that). It is great having a plan but it has to be affordable.

In the meantime it looks to me that RR was pretty well rewarded and that Prozone didnt actually bring that much to the group until we got the sales preceeds (and we cant be sure of that value).

Just how good was RR and his Board of Directors for CCFC?

Ok .... thats off my chest ..... back to the football
 
Last edited: Jul 19, 2012
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #2
oldskyblue58 said:
Just how good was RR and his Board of Directors for CCFC?
Click to expand...

Look in the mirror ... I am pretty sure you will see a very bright light bubble over your head .
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #3
Godiva said:
Look in the mirror ... I am pretty sure you will see a very bright light bubble over your head .
Click to expand...

always have been sceptical of RR ...... just never laid all the blame at his door SISU didnt do what they are attempting to do now .... control.... and RR, his board & SISU all share in the blame for the mess they created
 
Last edited: Jul 19, 2012
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #4
oldskyblue58 said:
always have been sceptical of RR ...... just never laid all the blame at his door SISU didnt do what they are attempting to do now .... control.... and RR, his appointees & SISU all share in the blame for the mess they created
Click to expand...

We can't put all the blame on him ... he couldn't have blown it without Hoffmann and Elliott.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #5
Ranson is massively to blame for where we are now. The fact he is still looked favourably upon by some is laughable.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #6
Sick Boy said:
Ranson is massively to blame for where we are now. The fact he is still looked favourably upon by some is laughable.
Click to expand...

I am more amazed people are hoping for Hoffman to come back.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #7
oldskyblue58 said:
Something on a post by Brighton Sky Blue got me thinking about what it was Prozone brought to the SBS&L Group and what RR got out of being involved.

SBS&L owned the Prozone Group up until 07/06/11

We have always assumed that Prozone Group made good profits.

Well there are 4 companies in that sub Group
Prozone Group (holding company)
Prozone Sports Limited (trading company owned by Prozone Group)
Prozone Media Limited (dormant didn't trade)
Prozone Sports international Limited (dormant didn't trade)

Prozone Group has had NO trading activity in the years to 31/05 2009,2010 or 2011... so no profits there to contribute. Interestingly that company did owe £1,563,141 to SBS&L as at 31/05/11 the company and its debt were acquired on 07/06/11 by SUP SAS. That I take to mean that SUP repaid the £1.5m to SBS&L and took on the debt that Prozone Group owed themselves. The other side of this is £1,563,141 was then owed by SBS&L to Arley Group PLC (owned by RR)..... would guess this is the value of Prozone to RR when he brought it in to the party (debt matches a liability)

Prozone Sports Limited, appears to be the only trading entity. In 2009 it made £312k in 2010 £205K and in 2011 it lost £73k..... so no great positives to SBS&L there. At 31/05/11 PSL had accumulated £2m in tax losses. Which suggests it never was that profitable
At 31/05/11 PSL owed SBS&L £2.2m. That debt was also transferred to SUP on 07/06/11. I assume SBS&L received payment for this amount on the transfer
It provided £80K pa in sports analysis services to CCFC and CCFC owed PSL £93k at 31/05/11
It paid Arley Group PLC the following amounts for RR's services 2009 £69K 2010 £75k and 2011 £123k. During those same years Arley Group invoiced CCFC H for RR's services 2008 £169k 2009 £226K 2010 £228K 2011 No details given but guess at £190k

interest accrued on SBS&L debt to Arley Group (RR) 2009 £154K 2010 £156K 2011 £130k (guess because no details in 2011 accounts)

Thoughts .....

07/06/11 SBS&L shifted some debt on by transferring the PG £1.5m to someone else so that meant it either repaid Arley or SUP now owed Arley. Either way SBS&L lost an asset and an equal value liability from its balance sheet
07/06/11 it looks like SBS&L got repaid by or is owed by SUP £2.2m but it also means that of the £29.7m put into SBS&L by SISU that at least 2.2m went into PSL

RR or Arley have taken from the SBS&L Group (including CCFC) £1,080k for RR's services, £440K in interest and repaid £1.5m in just over 3 years.

Have seen it said that RR had the right idea..... but clearly he let the overheads build and losses mount. We never could have afforded to bring in the likes of Carroll, Henderson etc unless that brought immediate success which in turn enhanced the individual sell value..... that was not guaranteed and both players could have disappeared in the championship if with us.

Have seen it said that he based it on youth, maybe but it was bought in youth not from our academy. Our academy was decent enough long before he came and wasnt he considering shutting it at one point ? (might be wrong on that). It is great having a plan but it has to be affordable.

In the meantime it looks to me that RR was pretty well rewarded and that Prozone didnt actually bring that much to the group until we got the sales preceeds (and we cant be sure of that value).

Just how good was RR and his Board of Directors for CCFC?

Ok .... thats off my chest ..... back to the football
Click to expand...

Pretty much what i was saying all along.
 
G

Godiva

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #8
lordsummerisle said:
Pretty much what i was saying all along.
Click to expand...

Give it 12 months and almost everybody on this forum will claim they said that all along.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #9
Certainly an eye opener regarding Ranson

Yet the i told you so brigade have started,

but why did they had these thoughts regarding ranson unless they had the facts.

if they had the facts then why not disclose them a long time ago as oldskyblue58 has
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 19, 2012
  • #10
cloughie said:
Certainly an eye opener regarding Ranson

Yet the i told you so brigade have started,

but why did they had these thoughts regarding ranson unless they had the facts.

if they had the facts then why not disclose them a long time ago as oldskyblue58 has
Click to expand...

The facts have all been on here before, the amount paid to Ranson, the huge interest bearing loans paid to Ranson, and previously mentioned myself that Pro-zones figures showed a loss in thie accounts.


Some people just didn't want to listen.

You were one of them.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 21, 2012
  • #11
]The facts have all been on here before, the amount paid to Ranson, the huge interest bearing loans paid to Ranson, and previously mentioned myself that Pro-zones figures showed a loss in thie accounts.


Some people just didn't want to listen.

You were one of them.[/QUOTE]

Thats because you have no credibility on this forum with your veiw of you must be right regardless of facts

which has often been exposed by other contributers on this forum
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 21, 2012
  • #12
cloughie said:
]The facts have all been on here before, the amount paid to Ranson, the huge interest bearing loans paid to Ranson, and previously mentioned myself that Pro-zones figures showed a loss in thie accounts.


Some people just didn't want to listen.

You were one of them.
Click to expand...

Thats because you have no credibility on this forum with your veiw of you must be right regardless of facts

which has often been exposed by other contributers on this forum[/QUOTE]

No, I have only used facts, others such as Ginetta, and NLWH, make up "facts" which are I often expose as made up.

Find a post from me that is not factual from me on here and post it.

I never took any great pleasure about being proven right about RR and Sisu in the past, would have been happy to be proven wrong, but won't have it that only because the innocent triumverate of Ranson/Hoffman/Elliott were somehow undermined and taken to the cleaners by Sisu andthey have no responsibility for what happened at all.

Specious argument used by the biggest Sisu supporters in the past to try and justify themselves now that they are born again anti-sisu zealots.

From the start I had my doubts about Sisu, particularly how much money they had to invest in us, would never have had a problem if been truthful from the start about player sales having to be made to balance the books .Said so at the time when Dann and Fox were sold, but according to RR and his lickspittles, Sisu didn't need to sell, was all down to the players having their heads turned and not down to the fact that the previous December Ranson had placed a "hands off" warning in the national press. Which was the thinnest veiled "please come and buy them, we haven't got much money" plea I've ever seen. Think Otis was of the same view at the time, but we were both pooh-poohed, our pooh-pooh's were pooh-poohed, until in the end the whole club was destroyed.

By pooh-poo.

It's about taking an educated view on things independently.

Some can't, or choose not to.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2012
  • #13
quote summerisle

Find a post from me that is not factual from me on here and post it.

I have neither the time or inclination to waste searching your posts

hey but if thats your thing , I need say no more
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2012
  • #14
cloughie said:
quote summerisle

Find a post from me that is not factual from me on here and post it.

I have neither the time or inclination to waste searching your posts

hey but if thats your thing , I need say no more
Click to expand...

Real shame that.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2012
  • #15
lordsummerisle said:
Real shame that.
Click to expand...

Don't worry he suggests thorn is a better manager than Strachan then refers to credibility.

Half an hour till closing time.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 22, 2012
  • #16
Grendel said:
Don't worry he suggests thorn is a better manager than Strachan then refers to credibility.

Half an hour till closing time.
Click to expand...

Closing time and clearly a time for some reflection.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #17
Grendel said:
Don't worry he suggests thorn is a better manager than Strachan then refers to credibility.

Half an hour till closing time.
Click to expand...

I have never suggested that on any post , as you falsely claim

but as you seem to be selective with the truth

ie. 'last season was the only season that we didn't sack amanager and we got relegated ' I offered that Strachan got us relegated, meaning you made yet another a false statement

Your credability???
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #18
cloughie said:
I have never suggested that on any post , as you falsely claim

but as you seem to be selective with the truth

ie. 'last season was the only season that we didn't sack amanager and we got relegated ' I offered that Strachan got us relegated, meaning you made yet another a false statement

Your credability???
Click to expand...

It remains above scrutiny.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #19
Grendel said:
It remains above scrutiny.
Click to expand...

you decieve only yourself
 

skyblueman

New Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #20
Anyone else enjoying this pissing competition?
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #21
skyblueman said:
Anyone else enjoying this pissing competition?
Click to expand...

Trust me I don't consider it a competion but it pisses me off when people claim I have said things that are I have not said , yet they are unwilling to accept that they are either wrong or have misinterpreted something I have said.


I agree a forum is supposed to be where we can have genuine debate and hear other info

But some on here are just wum's
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Jul 23, 2012
  • #22
cloughie said:
I agree a forum is supposed to be where we can have genuine debate and hear other info

But some on here are just wum's
Click to expand...

I agree.

There are a number of people on here who love Thorn, the only people I know who share their view are Leicester fans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?