I can't be the only one that is getting these mixed up.
We've got the Trust, formerly led by Steve who stepped down to run Fighting the Jimmy Hill Way and are now led by Moz. I thought the point of splitting off JHW was so the trust were arms length from protests but they still appear to be involved so not sure what was gained by creating another group.
Then we've got Jimmy Hill Way, formerly led by Steve, not sure who replaced Steve as that info doesn't appear to be on their website.
They were behind the march, the Joy photoshop and sit in but were denying on twitter yesterday having anything to do with whistles or the pitch invasion at the Sheff Utd game.
Next up is Preservation Sky Blues. Seem to be based around facebook and twitter and anonymous.
Finally CovFans2Gether, again based around facebook and twitter and anonymous.
Why so many groups, especially when those behind them remain anonymous? Surely better to merge into one under the direction of the Trust who, as they like to remind us, are the biggest fans group.
If none of these groups were behind things like the whistles and pitch invasion, which were clearly organised in advance, then who is?
The trust needs to be the main one that deals with the club.
It needs to be a little more controlled as it 'appears' to have had a few loose canons in important positions over the years.
Perhaps each action or statement should be voted on by the members and not at the Trust meetings where only a small proportion of the membership can attend.
In the day of social media this is quite fluid in its operation.
It needs to reset and start again and say forget the past and reestablish links.
You would say that, Splitter!!!Come on Otis, surely you can do better than that?!
Bloody hell, I'm agreeing (mostly) with you.The trust needs to be the main one that deals with the club.
It needs to be a little more controlled as it 'appears' to have had a few loose canons in important positions over the years.
Perhaps each action or statement should be voted on by the members and not at the Trust meetings where only a small proportion of the membership can attend.
In the day of social media this is quite fluid in its operation.
It needs to reset and start again and say forget the past and reestablish links.
Wrong, I suggest you ask David Johnson about all this.
You forgot to add the Sky Blue Talk group, a whole new entity.
Perhaps you need to read back all my previous posts and reassess yours ?Twice in 2 days I agree!
The trust needs to be the main one that deals with the club.
It needs to be a little more controlled as it 'appears' to have had a few loose canons in important positions over the years.
Perhaps each action or statement should be voted on by the members and not at the Trust meetings where only a small proportion of the membership can attend.
In the day of social media this is quite fluid in its operation.
It needs to reset and start again and say forget the past and reestablish links.
You've also forgotten the People's Front of Judea and the Judean People's Front.
Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk
They are a great band aren’t they. :singing:As well as the Red Sea pedestrians
The chap that used to post on here about Cov Utd?I suggest you ask David Johnson about all this.
When was that, have you a link?The chap that used to post on here about Cov Utd?
Did he ?The chap that used to post on here about Cov Utd?
It was a question, must have him mixed up with someone else.Did he ?
Know Dave really well has a Seat near me never knew he liked Cov United I know he goes to the odd Cov Rugger games though..
I can't be the only one that is getting these mixed up.
We've got the Trust, formerly led by Steve who stepped down to run Fighting the Jimmy Hill Way and are now led by Moz. I thought the point of splitting off JHW was so the trust were arms length from protests but they still appear to be involved so not sure what was gained by creating another group.
Then we've got Jimmy Hill Way, formerly led by Steve, not sure who replaced Steve as that info doesn't appear to be on their website.
They were behind the march, the Joy photoshop and sit in but were denying on twitter yesterday having anything to do with whistles or the pitch invasion at the Sheff Utd game.
Next up is Preservation Sky Blues. Seem to be based around facebook and twitter and anonymous.
Finally CovFans2Gether, again based around facebook and twitter and anonymous.
Why so many groups, especially when those behind them remain anonymous? Surely better to merge into one under the direction of the Trust who, as they like to remind us, are the biggest fans group.
If none of these groups were behind things like the whistles and pitch invasion, which were clearly organised in advance, then who is?
Why stop there?
London Supporters Group
Stadium Committee
Supporters Consultation Group
NOPM
Grendel's Angels
Nasty Nick and the Torcherettes
Sky Blue Kid
RFC and his home care team
It was a question, must have him mixed up with someone else.
The chap that used to post on here about Cov Utd?
When was that, have you a link?
Guess it depends what you class as working. They still have the same owners they are trying to get rid of several years down the line.The idea of groups led by anonymous individuals does work. Tangerine Knights are a prime example.
But then you have them claiming no knowledge of the whistles or pitch invasion at the Sheff Utd game. Seems pointless having a group to bring everyone under one banner if they have no clue what's going on.There's a case that there are too many groups so the idea of The JHWA was to bring them all under one banner to bang ideas around and help each other achieve the overall goal.
That's where things aren't being thought through. If you have a protest involving whistles a bit of thought would tell you people might bring them to the next game. Why not get ahead of the problem and make it clear its unacceptable before hand.I think it was just random individuals with the whistles. I have no idea what they hoped to achieve.
You omitted the Council Care Home ran by Council Dart with you as the management trust paying him a meagre wage - hence his nonsensical posts.
Guess it depends what you class as working. They still have the same owners they are trying to get rid of several years down the line.
But then you have them claiming no knowledge of the whistles or pitch invasion at the Sheff Utd game. Seems pointless having a group to bring everyone under one banner if they have no clue what's going on.
That's where things aren't being thought through. If you have a protest involving whistles a bit of thought would tell you people might bring them to the next game. Why not get ahead of the problem and make it clear its unacceptable before hand.
To me its far better to have one group, with a clear objective and a plan for what happens should that objective be achieved.
I agree with the OP here that there are too many groups all with similar agendas. Why is it so difficult to have one group to represent the fans and have a common goal and an open line of communication with the club? I know I'll probably get crucified for this but why not have someone who can talk to Tim Fisher? Keep your enemies close and all that. From the conversations I've had with other fans the main concern seems to be too many groups with no real direction. Maybe with a democratic trust we could stop the infighting and hopefully achieve our aim of getting our club back?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?