Just me being pedantic, but the interview starts at 3h 10' 54".
Sure Is worth alisten .
I think he nails it .
I also think they have to get us back and and are more desperate than they show .
Joy would never allowed herself to be Identified unless a change of tack was required IMO.
Not sure the ball is in Joys court now though... with the Open letter following ACL's pay up and drop the legal stuff....
Hopefully ACL will accept that the 590K has been put in an Escrow with the FL pending their decision as acceptable and should the JR appeal be rejected today SISU will let it drop...
Maybe then we can move forward
So if Sisu fail with the JR appeal will it be claimed that they have withdrawn their legal actions ?
The ball is in her court. She took City out of the City, she needs to put them back.
Talk about FFP is a smokescreen.
you dont want club to own ricoh
you dont want them to have matchday revenues
do you even support ccfc?
you dont want club to own ricoh
you dont want them to have matchday revenues
do you even support ccfc?
It's not about what I want, it's about what's possible.
I want Messi playing for CCFC next season, for free.
Are you not a fan if you tell me it's not likely?
.
Why should the market be distorted by giving the club state aid? Surely they have to be purchased at a commercial price.
Can you please tell me how much Swansea had to pay for them?
its not likely but i would love it. you seem to want ccfc to be back on rent only deal forever.
4Million initial Sale, then ACL want £24millionCan you tell us how much we had to pay for them initially? you know, before we sold them at a profit.
Can you please tell me how much Swansea had to pay for them?
would that be the same Swansea city that are under investigation by the European commision regarding state aid?
Ah, that old chestnut. All councils have an obligation to give millions of pounds as a financial gift to football clubs by paying for their new stadiums with no return to the council.
Before you characterise the above as "why do you care about the council?" ...I'm just using this to point out how unreasonable SISU's basic case is.
They didn't pay for the stadium and the amount of rent already paid more than accounts for what cost the council actually put into the scheme.
So what? How has that affected the club. Ok then have a look at a few other arrangements on council run grounds - hull, forest, Ipswich, the list is endless. The way the council assisted forest when they were struggling with loan payments is most interesting - I could really see pur council helping in the same way - not.
Didn't realise that the rent paid so far comes to over £31m ... check your facts!
CCFC paid jack all towards the Ricoh costs yet talks about the Ricoh as if it has some kind of moral ownership..pathetic, if you want it, pay full price for it. Ans by that I mean refund the full build cost, not the "value of ACL" which you have tried to destroy.
So what? How has that affected the club. Ok then have a look at a few other arrangements on council run grounds - hull, forest, Ipswich, the list is endless. The way the council assisted forest when they were struggling with loan payments is most interesting - I could really see pur council helping in the same way - not.
Why pay build cost? Pay market value for NOW.
Because market value should be paid not build cost surely? Do people buy houses based on build costs? They should pay what it is worth here and now whether it is more or less than build cost.Well that would suit CCFC very nicely, but hardly fair. The build cost is REAL... that's the debt that SISU tried to wipe out. Why is it so hard to expect CCFC to pay the build cost of the Ricoh, either via rent or via an ownership/payment refund?
The club has viciously tried to destroy the value in ACL to get it on the cheap - essentially they want the ground without having to pay for the building of it.
Because market value should be paid not build cost surely? Do people buy houses based on build costs? They should pay what it is worth here and now whether it is more or less than build cost.
Didn't realise that the rent paid so far comes to over £31m ... check your facts!
CCFC paid jack all towards the Ricoh costs yet talks about the Ricoh as if it has some kind of moral ownership..pathetic, if you want it, pay full price for it. Ans by that I mean refund the full build cost, not the "value of ACL" which you have tried to destroy.
i think the point is "ASSISTED", the club asked for help and got it....
rather than SISU's modus operandi of DEMAND and get nothing so then stop paying the rent.
Why pay build cost? Pay market value for NOW.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?