Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Pretty Confirmed Now (4 Viewers)

  • Thread starter dongonzalos
  • Start date Sep 26, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 27, 2013
  • #36
dear oh dear, grendel, i'm not looking to antagonise, but,
when in a hole, stop digging
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 27, 2013
  • #37
I see RFC has been mention on the document more them once :thinking about:
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #38
Grendel said:
So he held her in contempt of court, perjury what exactly, remind me what she was charged of?
Click to expand...

You really need to do your homework before you debate with us well briefed fans
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #39
Grendel said:
So, she was found guilty of lying in court then? Sorry can't see that on the link?
Click to expand...

The only reason she got away with it was in case she has a dreadful memory. She just couldn't remember the truth when it went against what she was lying. ....sorry.....saying.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #40
Grendel said:
How can someone allegedly be proven a liar in court? What are you on about?
Click to expand...

Are you sure?

ACL have not always admitted they agreed a HOT to sell the Higgs share to SISU?
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #41
James Smith said:
I thought the only HOT that SISU had signed that had been confirmed by the other side was with the Higgs and SISU/CCFC walked away. That's the only one I know of that anyone apart from SISU/CCFC has confirmed existed, I've never seen the distress ACL/YB/Mortgage one confirmed by anyone other SISU/CCFC - has this changed?
Click to expand...

That's what I have always talked about and ACL have always admitted the HOT had been signed
 
P

PWKH

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #42
ACL had agreed with CCFC an HoT over rent on 29 January 2013, which was then reneged on by CCFC.
There was an HoT agreed between ACL and CCFC to engage in a co-operation agreement in early 2008.
There have been no other HoTs between ACL and any of the Sisu web of companies.
There was an HoT between the AEHC and Sisu Capital in June 2012 which Sisu Capital effectively walked away from. There have been no other HoTs between the AEHC and any of the Sisu web of companies.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #43
Troll by name...Troll by nature.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #44
PWKH said:
ACL had agreed with CCFC an HoT over rent on 29 January 2013, which was then reneged on by CCFC.
There was an HoT agreed between ACL and CCFC to engage in a co-operation agreement in early 2008.
There have been no other HoTs between ACL and any of the Sisu web of companies.
There was an HoT between the AEHC and Sisu Capital in June 2012 which Sisu Capital effectively walked away from. There have been no other HoTs between the AEHC and any of the Sisu web of companies.
Click to expand...

A bit misleading when you consider you added this in the other thread.

There was no request by the AEHC to the Council to sell to Sisu Capital and there was therefore no veto exercised by the Council. What may or may not have been said informally to Seppala by somebody from the Council has not been shared with the AEHC by either the Council or Sisu Capital.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
 

DazzleTommyDazzle

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #45
stupot07 said:
A bit misleading when you consider you added this in the other thread.

There was no request by the AEHC to the Council to sell to Sisu Capital and there was therefore no veto exercised by the Council. What may or may not have been said informally to Seppala by somebody from the Council has not been shared with the AEHC by either the Council or Sisu Capital.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
Click to expand...

Why is it misleading?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #46
DazzleTommyDazzle said:
Why is it misleading?
Click to expand...

They said they were told that the sale wouldn't be authorised, so what's the point of carrying on discussions?

Yes, we don't trust JS, but that doesn't mean we should take everything PWKH says at face value. I wonder if he's been briefed by Weber Shandwick before coming on here, the article is now 2 days old.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
 
P

PWKH

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #47
I wonder if he's been briefed by Weber Shandwick before coming on here, the article is now 2 days old.

No.
 
T

thaiskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #48
sorry lads but who is "Weber Shandwick"?, just so i can follow the conversation. cheers.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #49
thaiskyblue said:
sorry lads but who is "Weber Shandwick"?, just so i can follow the conversation. cheers.
Click to expand...

I believe the PR company ACL are using to "assist" in communications and image.
 
T

thaiskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #50
Grendel said:
I believe the PR company ACL are using to "assist" in communications and image.
Click to expand...
thank you Grendel.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #51
stupot07 said:
They said they were told that the sale wouldn't be authorised, so what's the point of carrying on discussions?

Yes, we don't trust JS, but that doesn't mean we should take everything PWKH says at face value. I wonder if he's been briefed by Weber Shandwick before coming on here, the article is now 2 days old.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
Click to expand...

I hope he has
Means he is doing things in a professional manner.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #52
dongonzalos said:
I hope he has
Means he is doing things in a professional manner.
Click to expand...

Representing his side in the appropriate way you mean.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #53
Grendel said:
Representing his side in the appropriate way you mean.
Click to expand...

Professional
I am sure you would be the first to criticise if he didn't
 
Last edited: Sep 28, 2013
G

Grappa

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #54
PWKH said:
I wonder if he's been briefed by Weber Shandwick before coming on here, the article is now 2 days old.

No.
Click to expand...

Bit of a Catch 22 but that would be the answer any decent PR company would advise, according to my PR advisor.
 
T

thaiskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #55
rosiesb said:
Councillors would find it political suicide to sell to sisu or anyone at a reduced price. Wonder if the trust will finally stand up and be counted and reveal they have a plan to buy the club or not as was stated was their reason for forming, and is still on their website one of the their prime objectives. If they aren't, then what is the point?

Apparently you have the support of the people of coventry, and supposedly their is a fighting fund for this purpose - so what is stopping them? Or are they just a talking shop, paralysed and incapable of any real actions?

Surely this is last resort time!
Click to expand...
kEEPING THEIR POWDER DRY, I HOPE, NOPM...........
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #56
rosiesb said:
Councillors would find it political suicide to sell to sisu or anyone at a reduced price. Wonder if the trust will finally stand up and be counted and reveal they have a plan to buy the club or not as was stated was their reason for forming, and is still on their website one of the their prime objectives. If they aren't, then what is the point?

Apparently you have the support of the people of coventry, and supposedly their is a fighting fund for this purpose - so what is stopping them? Or are they just a talking shop, paralysed and incapable of any real actions?

Surely this is last resort time!
Click to expand...

The trust buy the club...lol



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #57
stupot07 said:
They said they were told that the sale wouldn't be authorised, so what's the point of carrying on discussions?

Yes, we don't trust JS, but that doesn't mean we should take everything PWKH says at face value. I wonder if he's been briefed by Weber Shandwick before coming on here, the article is now 2 days old.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
Click to expand...

Also it would be no skin off SISU's nose to push it to the vote.

Also imagine their PR in this whole debacle if they attempted to buy the Higgs share and the council did an official vote against it.

Why would SISU not request the vote after agreeing the HoT. Win win for SISU.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #58
dongonzalos said:
Also it would be no skin off SISU's nose to push it to the vote.

Also imagine their PR in this whole debacle if they attempted to buy the Higgs share and the council did an official vote against it.

Why would SISU not request the vote after agreeing the HoT. Win win for SISU.
Click to expand...

Not really, it would be quite a bit of work to get it to a vote, you can't just turn up and say let's vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #59
Grendel said:
Representing his side in the appropriate way you mean.
Click to expand...

Better than Joy representing her side in a very inappropriate way....or do you agree with the way she has dealt with our club?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #60
rosiesb said:
I agree, but this was what they said they were founded to do - act as a last resort. If this isn't last chance saloon, where the club has been stolen from coventry then what would be the final straw for them?

Or are they just a talking shop?
Click to expand...

As painful as it is, we have only played 4 games outside of Coventry, I don't believe we are at last chance saloon territory just yet
 
T

thaiskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #61
rosiesb said:
what good is having dry powder if you have no (cannon) balls?

After joyless's statement, they want the stadium free/on the cheap, just wanting to mediate is utterly meaningless. And as for the at least they are trying bs, as yoda said...

Do or do not - there is no try!
Click to expand...
sisu are flapping play it cool................
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #62
dongonzalos said:
I am pretty confident now

Council attempted to outmanoeuvre SISU.
Click to expand...

So that's ok, but when it's the people who are paying to keep our club running (regardless of what comes back to this statement, it's factually correct) trying to outmanoeuvre a council who were party to ripping the club off pre-SISU, that's ok?

Contradictory..........
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #63
Skyblueweeman said:
So that's ok, but when it's the people who are paying to keep our club running (regardless of what comes back to this statement, it's factually correct) trying to outmanoeuvre a council who were party to ripping the club off pre-SISU, that's ok?

Contradictory..........
Click to expand...

I think rent was illegally withheld before the council tried to outmanoeuvre SISU was it not?
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #64
dongonzalos said:
I think rent was illegally withheld before the council tried to outmanoeuvre SISU was it not?
Click to expand...

I salute you... there you have it... cause and effect.... lots seem to miss that very point well done sir.:claping hands:
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #65
If SISU had come in and said this club has been poorly ran
For so many years this is why. Also the rent is ridiculous, we need revenues streams for the club to survive. This is our business plan.

ACL sell the stadium to us this is our offer. You won't okay we will have to build our own.


If SiSU had been like that every fan would be behind them. They haven't. They have excluded fans, followed their own agenda and are in it for themselves not CCFC or football fans.

Their goal is probably still plan A or B, Their route to it probably plan D or E.

They will go when it suites them win or loose. It is the potential legacy or lack of legacy that worries me.

I am glad she spoke, she had an opportunity to try and convince me about their plans. She hasn't she has confirmed my suspicions and fears about SISU and their agenda.

I would like to say we have hit bottom and we can at least move onwards and upwards. I feel worse is yet to come.

So I say to every Coventry fan fight for what you believe in: Coventry City Football Club and its history and its community fabric.

It doesn't matter whether you blame SISU, ACL, CCC or the FL or indeed all of them: Protest and keep the protest in the public eye and don't rely on one type of protest. None of the above like bad publicity. I believe the fans have started to influence people and I believe we can influence things even more. But we have to fight on all fronts and from all angles. It's time for the fans to TWIST AND SHOUT.
 
T

thaiskyblue

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #66
Hobo said:
If SISU had come in and said this club has been poorly ran
For so many years this is why. Also the rent is ridiculous, we need revenues streams for the club to survive. This is our business plan.

ACL sell the stadium to us this is our offer. You won't okay we will have to build our own.

well said Hobo, with real meaning and feeling.
If SiSU had been like that every fan would be behind them. They haven't. They have excluded fans, followed their own agenda and are in it for themselves not CCFC or football fans.

Their goal is probably still plan A or B, Their route to it probably plan D or E.

They will go when it suites them win or loose. It is the potential legacy or lack of legacy that worries me.

I am glad she spoke, she had an opportunity to try and convince me about their plans. She hasn't she has confirmed my suspicions and fears about SISU and their agenda.

I would like to say we have hit bottom and we can at least move onwards and upwards. I feel worse is yet to come.

So I say to every Coventry fan fight for what you believe in: Coventry City Football Club and its history and its community fabric.

It doesn't matter whether you blame SISU, ACL, CCC or the FL or indeed all of them: Protest and keep the protest in the public eye and don't rely on one type of protest. None of the above like bad publicity. I believe the fans have started to influence people and I believe we can influence things even more. But we have to fight on all fronts and from all angles. It's time for the fans to TWIST AND SHOUT.
Click to expand...
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #67
dongonzalos said:
I think rent was illegally withheld before the council tried to outmanoeuvre SISU was it not?
Click to expand...

I don't dispute that but read my post again. The clue is in the bit where I say 'pre-Sisu'.

So you're fine with the fact that the council were part of the agreement that overcharged us from Day One at the Ricoh? At the time, admittedly, none of us were party to the rental agreement (or saw it as relevant). In my opinion, which in many eyes is probably wrong, the council as part of the ACL set up, knew that they were on to a little winner with setting £1.2m rent when we moved in. It's over the odds for a Championship club today, let alone 7 or so years ago.

We can castigate SISU for lack of due diligence (they have admitted that themselves) but don't paint a picture that SISU withholding rent was worse than our club being horrendously overcharged from day one. The previous owners (as I've said before) are as much to blame as the current lot, but ACL/CCC are also as culpable.

WM
 

skybluefred

New Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #68
Skyblueweeman said:
I don't dispute that but read my post again. The clue is in the bit where I say 'pre-Sisu'.

So you're fine with the fact that the council were part of the agreement that overcharged us from Day One at the Ricoh? At the time, admittedly, none of us were party to the rental agreement (or saw it as relevant). In my opinion, which in many eyes is probably wrong, the council as part of the ACL set up, knew that they were on to a little winner with setting £1.2m rent when we moved in. It's over the odds for a Championship club today, let alone 7 or so years ago.

We can castigate SISU for lack of due diligence (they have admitted that themselves) but don't paint a picture that SISU withholding rent was worse than our club being horrendously overcharged from day one. The previous owners (as I've said before) are as much to blame as the current lot, but ACL/CCC are also as culpable.

WM
Click to expand...

Hi Weeman,long time since the Telegraph days,how are you keeping?

I have a slightly different view on the Ricoh/ACL/CCC set up to you. I think the rental was set at £1.2m because a quick return to the Premiership was envisaged by the then owners of CCFC. The rent then would not have been a problem and
would have given the CCC a return on it's huge investment. However I do agree that for a mediocre Championship club
it was always going to be a problem,and without F&B and other match day revenues the further relegation was inevitable.

Sisu have no interest in football--Coventry or the fans,their sole interest is how much money they can make from a distressed business. They have sold every player they could and have not invested in the team in any way.Their big
mistake was in not conducting a thorough enough due diligence before buying CCFC, had they have done so they could
have had a rent review before agreeing the purchase.

It is high time Sisu & CCC got together to sort a rent out that enables a return to the RICOH and the club to make progress,this cannot happen while Joy Seppala insists on outright ownership of the Stadia because this will never happen.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #69
Skyblueweeman said:
I don't dispute that but read my post again. The clue is in the bit where I say 'pre-Sisu'.

So you're fine with the fact that the council were part of the agreement that overcharged us from Day One at the Ricoh? At the time, admittedly, none of us were party to the rental agreement (or saw it as relevant). In my opinion, which in many eyes is probably wrong, the council as part of the ACL set up, knew that they were on to a little winner with setting £1.2m rent when we moved in. It's over the odds for a Championship club today, let alone 7 or so years ago.

We can castigate SISU for lack of due diligence (they have admitted that themselves) but don't paint a picture that SISU withholding rent was worse than our club being horrendously overcharged from day one. The previous owners (as I've said before) are as much to blame as the current lot, but ACL/CCC are also as culpable.

WM
Click to expand...

Unfortunately the outmanoeuvred bit we were talking about was a direct result of the rent strike.

The over charged rent you refer to was preferred by the pre SISU football club over the sliding scale rent that was proposed.

SISU were not blind when they bought the club they were fully aware of what the rent was and agreed to it.

Mis-managed the club failed to achieve any success.

Then the rent become the complete and utter sole total cause for all of Coventry's financial woes.

That was until a dirt cheap rent was offered.

Then food and beverages become the sole complete and utter cause of all of Coventry's financial woes. That was until 80% of that was offered.

Now SISU have finally all but admitted they just want the Ricoh.
 
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 28, 2013
  • #70
quite so Don, good points,
why was the rent never challenged when they took over ?
who let a succession of misfits be controllers (Clouting, Dulieu, Brody, Igwe, Fisher) ?
& exactly what would the food & beverage profit amounted to ?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?