dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
I am pretty confident now
SISU withheld rent in order to distress ACL and buy the mortgage.
Council were bullied into accepting the idea. Begrudgingly went along with it but really did not want to get into bed with SISU.
Council saw a glimmer of hope when Mr Haskell came on the scene.
Council attempted to outmanoeuvre SISU.
They bought the mortgage for its true value and not what SISU were going to try and screw out of the Yorkshire bank.
They believed SISU left with an reinvigorated ACL would either agree a low rent and try and make the club a success in order to sell it or they would sell up to the highest bidder.
Mr Haskell would then buy both the club and ACL.
You can see why this was attractive to the council.
Ms Seppala decided not to take it lying down.
From the day this happened she was never going to sign a rental agreement.
In order to keep the FL on side it needed to look like it was about unaffordable rent and F & B.
However it never was.
Ms Seppala's new plan was not sell CCFC for 10 million or agree a cheap rent.
Her new plan was to leave the stadium empty for 5 years and buy both the Higgs and the Councils share at a distressed business price.
Move the football club back in automatically making it a viable business and sell it for a large profit.
Recouping her investment.
With this latest interview it is now more likely than not that she did say to ACL I am only coming back as owner and at my price.
It is also more likely than not that she said in the mean time I will continue to hit you with expensive litigation.
Hence the appeal on a matter that was pretty much laughed out of court.
Why appeal something that you have no chance if winning that costs you money?
Also if Ms Sepalla is telling the truth that she is not interested in the Ricoh then why continue the expensive litigation that you can't win?
I am pretty sure now it is 100% about the Ricoh and no new ground will be built.
So this can only be decided by ......
Council sell to SISU
Council find a new tenant
I can't see the council selling to SISU.
I think if they start genuine negotiations with someone else, then SISU would come back and buy the Higgs share.
In the meantime until November 28th we won't hear much from the council. So we will not know what they are up to.
Instead I think we will hear plenty from SISU cranking up the pressure.
SISU withheld rent in order to distress ACL and buy the mortgage.
Council were bullied into accepting the idea. Begrudgingly went along with it but really did not want to get into bed with SISU.
Council saw a glimmer of hope when Mr Haskell came on the scene.
Council attempted to outmanoeuvre SISU.
They bought the mortgage for its true value and not what SISU were going to try and screw out of the Yorkshire bank.
They believed SISU left with an reinvigorated ACL would either agree a low rent and try and make the club a success in order to sell it or they would sell up to the highest bidder.
Mr Haskell would then buy both the club and ACL.
You can see why this was attractive to the council.
Ms Seppala decided not to take it lying down.
From the day this happened she was never going to sign a rental agreement.
In order to keep the FL on side it needed to look like it was about unaffordable rent and F & B.
However it never was.
Ms Seppala's new plan was not sell CCFC for 10 million or agree a cheap rent.
Her new plan was to leave the stadium empty for 5 years and buy both the Higgs and the Councils share at a distressed business price.
Move the football club back in automatically making it a viable business and sell it for a large profit.
Recouping her investment.
With this latest interview it is now more likely than not that she did say to ACL I am only coming back as owner and at my price.
It is also more likely than not that she said in the mean time I will continue to hit you with expensive litigation.
Hence the appeal on a matter that was pretty much laughed out of court.
Why appeal something that you have no chance if winning that costs you money?
Also if Ms Sepalla is telling the truth that she is not interested in the Ricoh then why continue the expensive litigation that you can't win?
I am pretty sure now it is 100% about the Ricoh and no new ground will be built.
So this can only be decided by ......
Council sell to SISU
Council find a new tenant
I can't see the council selling to SISU.
I think if they start genuine negotiations with someone else, then SISU would come back and buy the Higgs share.
In the meantime until November 28th we won't hear much from the council. So we will not know what they are up to.
Instead I think we will hear plenty from SISU cranking up the pressure.