Preston Haskell in the casino last night (2 Viewers)

brinner · Apr 20, 2013

Joe and gary were in the casino last night with Preston Haskell and Ted Sullivan.......they are deadly serious about the take over, the administrator needs to get his arse in to gear so they can get this sorted.

There is a light at the end of this dark tunnel we are currently in, we need to all pray that this takeover goes through.

SISU OUT!!

Nonleagueherewecome · Apr 20, 2013

Lets hope it never goes out... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INgXzChwipY

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XoIOkdZNOQU&desktop_uri=/watch?v=XoIOkdZNOQU#

Shame they are from Leicester

KersleyDigs · Apr 20, 2013

dongonzalos said:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XoIOkdZNOQU&desktop_uri=/watch?v=XoIOkdZNOQU#

Shame they are from Leicester

....and shit ;-)

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

Relevant song though waiting for someone or something to take me over

ricohman · Apr 20, 2013

Yeah hope hes patient and hangs around for as long as it takes to sort this mess out

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

ricohman said:
Yeah hope hes patient and hangs around for as long as it takes to sort this mess out

Has said he will be here as long as it takes even if it six months.

Gary Hoffman's only concern is that at the end of the day he is not a Cov City fan.

If whilst the messing around carries on a better opportunity pops up else where he will probably go for it.

Skybluerevolution (Pt2) · Apr 20, 2013

dongonzalos said:
Has said he will be here as long as it takes even if it six months.

Gary Hoffman's only concern is that at the end of the day he is not a Cov City fan.

If whilst the messing around carries on a better opportunity pops up else where he will probably go for it.

Did Gary Hoffman say that to you regarding his concerns about PH nor being a Cov fan? or is this just your view of the situation?

SydneySkyBlue · Apr 20, 2013

Skybluerevolution (Pt2) said:
Did Gary Hoffman say that to you regarding his concerns about PH nor being a Cov fan? or is this just your view of the situation?

He told us at the talk in Kenilworth.

It wouldn't surprise me if the administrator takes his holiday and scratches his arse for longer than 6 months, and in the mean time a better opportunity crops us for Haskell and he ups and leaves. This is CCFC after all.

Grendel · Apr 20, 2013

GinettasStickySofa said:
He told us at the talk in Kenilworth.

It wouldn't surprise me if the administrator takes his holiday and scratches his arse for longer than 6 months, and in the mean time a better opportunity crops us for Haskell and he ups and leaves. This is CCFC after all.

So he will buy the club regardless of the situation regarding the Ricoh? Club first discussions about the ground second?

Paxman II · Apr 20, 2013

The Administrator has an obligation to report back by mid May.

SydneySkyBlue · Apr 20, 2013

Grendel said:
So he will buy the club regardless of the situation regarding the Ricoh? Club first discussions about the ground second?

Not sure what you're getting at here but my point was that he is looking to a buy a football club and we're just 'lucky' that at the moment he is keen on ours. That could change over time.

On the stadium,
The club and the stadium have to come hand in hand, not only for a successful future but also for Haskell to be interested in the purchase in the first place.

Personally, I'm not naive enough to think the man would be interested if the stadium wasnt part of the deal.

I would also hope that he's very interested and clued up on the property side of it because that is the key to a stable and promising future for the club anyway.

torchomatic · Apr 20, 2013

What difference does being a Cov fan make? Zero, I would say. He either will take us on or he won't. It's an investment for him.

dongonzalos said:
Has said he will be here as long as it takes even if it six months.

Gary Hoffman's only concern is that at the end of the day he is not a Cov City fan.

If whilst the messing around carries on a better opportunity pops up else where he will probably go for it.

@richh87 · Apr 20, 2013

torchomatic said:
What difference does being a Cov fan make? Zero, I would say. He either will take us on or he won't. It's an investment for him.

What they mean Torch is that he won't wait forever because he's not a Cov fan.

@richh87 · Apr 20, 2013

GinettasStickySofa said:
Not sure what you're getting at here but my point was that he is looking to a buy a football club and we're just 'lucky' that at the moment he is keen on ours. That could change over time.

On the stadium,
The club and the stadium have to come hand in hand, not only for a successful future but also for Haskell to be interested in the purchase in the first place.

Personally, I'm not naive enough to think the man would be interested if the stadium wasnt part of the deal.

I would also hope that he's very interested and clued up on the property side of it because that is the key to a stable and promising future for the club anyway.

50% of the stadium can be bought from the Higgs Trust, but the Council will never sell their share. That's the impression I got from the talk in Kenilworth.

torchomatic · Apr 20, 2013

Oh, OK. Couldn't fathom that from Dongo's post. Who cares who any potential investor supports?

@richh87 said:
What they mean Torch is that he won't wait forever because he's not a Cov fan.

ajsccfc · Apr 20, 2013

I think once he's in it doesn't matter if he's a fan, but that he doesn't have an emotional tie to the club makes everyone that little more anxious that he could understandably get bored of waiting around the longer it all goes on.

@richh87 · Apr 20, 2013

torchomatic said:
Oh, OK. Couldn't fathom that from Dongo's post. Who cares who any potential investor supports?

Just means that time is short to get this administrators arse in gear. Seems like the guy is going to drag it out until the opportunity has gone.

Mucca Mad Boys · Apr 20, 2013

Assuming the administrator is to blame? Behave, if he's supposed to impartial and meant to do everything properly, he can't just whore himself to PH4 straight away!

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

torchomatic said:
What difference does being a Cov fan make? Zero, I would say. He either will take us on or he won't. It's an investment for him.

Simon Jordan, Dave Whelan, Steve Gibson they bought the clubs they support.

Haskell wants an investment currently Coventry are the best option if a better one pops up he will go for that.

If you are a Cov Fan you may not look elsewhere you may continue to pursue Cov.

He isn't so there are no sentimental ties

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

Skybluerevolution (Pt2) said:
Did Gary Hoffman say that to you regarding his concerns about PH nor being a Cov fan? or is this just your view of the situation?

Gary Hoffman's

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

torchomatic said:
Oh, OK. Couldn't fathom that from Dongo's post. Who cares who any potential investor supports?

No I wasn't getting at that.

It is exactly as Rich explained.

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Assuming the administrator is to blame? Behave, if he's supposed to impartial and meant to do everything properly, he can't just whore himself to PH4 straight away!

?????

Do you think there are going to be a lot of millionaires in the running.

He has a duty to the creditors to get their money back.

You would be pretty peed as a creditor if the administrator too so long a multimillionaire went elsewhere

torchomatic · Apr 20, 2013

dongonzalos said:
No I wasn't getting at that.

It is exactly as Rich explained.

Right, so bwcause he's not a City fan then he may not hang around? Fair enough, we will have to hope there is someone else then, won't we?

Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

Mucca Mad Boys · Apr 20, 2013

dongonzalos said:
?????

Do you think there are going to be a lot of millionaires in the running.

He has a duty to the creditors to get their money back.

You would be pretty peed as a creditor if the administrator too so long a multimillionaire went elsewhere

He's go though the right processes and act impartially.

torchomatic · Apr 20, 2013

dongonzalos said:
?????

Do you think there are going to be a lot of millionaires in the running.

He has a duty to the creditors to get their money back.

You would be pretty peed as a creditor if the administrator too so long a multimillionaire went elsewhere

the administator does what he has to. Doesn't he have to report in May. i'm sure PHcan wait that long.

Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

dongonzalos · Apr 20, 2013

torchomatic said:
Right, so bwcause he's not a City fan then he may not hang around? Fair enough, we will have to hope there is someone else then, won't we?

Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2

Hopefully it just happens but not sure SISU will allow it.

@richh87 · Apr 20, 2013

SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Assuming the administrator is to blame? Behave, if he's supposed to impartial and meant to do everything properly, he can't just whore himself to PH4 straight away!

It's taken him weeks to find the football league share, and went on holiday. Not good enough. This is more important than some bloke's holiday arrangements.

Also, Hoffman has written to him three times to officially communicate an interest in the club - and as of the other night in Kenilworth, had received no response.

Doesn't sound like the guy is doing his job to me. SISU were desperate to appoint their own administrator; think we're starting to find out why.

Paxman II · Apr 20, 2013

Lets get a simple fact right shall we that keeps getting misconstrued continuously....

The Council own the freehold of the stadium.
ACL have a lease with the Higgs Charity. (50% each)

What is and always has been available to Coventry City football club is the option on the Higgs charity share.

This alone will not give the football club income streams they seek.

The protagonist in all this is the Council.

So buying the Higgs charity share is not buying half the stadium which keeps getting quoted.

I have said over and over that ACL is a brick wall in all this. Council should disband ACL. The freehold can be kept by the council for the City of Coventry. BUT let the football club run and operate the stadium. Give IT a long substantial lease to the whole complex. Without something akin to that prospect ANY owner, save of pumping some cash in for a while, will find the football club unsustainable without it.

SISU had tried to bring this about and failed. Their approach was wrong, the theory was right. ACL won't listen and the Council won't listen.
We need a new knight to ride in and want to pay a hefty premium for a 99 year lease and with it buy the football club. Maybe even invest in the land development as a rider to that deal.

Step up Mr Haskell. No one will deal with SISU on this basis. What SISU want is an exit plan agreed where they get some investment back.

Surely everyone can get a deal that suits the City, the development, the football club and the people of Coventry. Why is everyone dancing around the issues while our football club falls into a laughing stock?

Someone remind these councillors they are not in business, they are a council body representing the interest of the taxpayers of Coventry. Do the right thing.

SydneySkyBlue · Apr 21, 2013

Paxman II said:
Lets get a simple fact right shall we that keeps getting misconstrued continuously....

The Council own the freehold of the stadium.
ACL have a lease with the Higgs Charity. (50% each)

What is and always has been available to Coventry City football club is the option on the Higgs charity share.

This alone will not give the football club income streams they seek.

The protagonist in all this is the Council.

So buying the Higgs charity share is not buying half the stadium which keeps getting quoted.

I have said over and over that ACL is a brick wall in all this. Council should disband ACL. The freehold can be kept by the council for the City of Coventry. BUT let the football club run and operate the stadium. Give IT a long substantial lease to the whole complex. Without something akin to that prospect ANY owner, save of pumping some cash in for a while, will find the football club unsustainable without it.

SISU had tried to bring this about and failed. Their approach was wrong, the theory was right. ACL won't listen and the Council won't listen.
We need a new knight to ride in and want to pay a hefty premium for a 99 year lease and with it buy the football club. Maybe even invest in the land development as a rider to that deal.

Step up Mr Haskell. No one will deal with SISU on this basis. What SISU want is an exit plan agreed where they get some investment back.

Surely everyone can get a deal that suits the City, the development, the football club and the people of Coventry. Why is everyone dancing around the issues while our football club falls into a laughing stock?

Someone remind these councillors they are not in business, they are a council body representing the interest of the taxpayers of Coventry. Do the right thing.

100% correct of course. Just wondering why you believe the council wouldn't be willing to cooperate if the club was in the right hands - this may even mean Haskell proving himself to be a good owner over time should the proposed takeover go through.

Flying Fokker · Apr 21, 2013

Paxman II said:
Lets get a simple fact right shall we that keeps getting misconstrued continuously....

The Council own the freehold of the stadium.
ACL have a lease with the Higgs Charity. (50% each)

What is and always has been available to Coventry City football club is the option on the Higgs charity share.

This alone will not give the football club income streams they seek.

The protagonist in all this is the Council.

So buying the Higgs charity share is not buying half the stadium which keeps getting quoted.

I have said over and over that ACL is a brick wall in all this. Council should disband ACL. The freehold can be kept by the council for the City of Coventry. BUT let the football club run and operate the stadium. Give IT a long substantial lease to the whole complex. Without something akin to that prospect ANY owner, save of pumping some cash in for a while, will find the football club unsustainable without it.

SISU had tried to bring this about and failed. Their approach was wrong, the theory was right. ACL won't listen and the Council won't listen.
We need a new knight to ride in and want to pay a hefty premium for a 99 year lease and with it buy the football club. Maybe even invest in the land development as a rider to that deal.

Step up Mr Haskell. No one will deal with SISU on this basis. What SISU want is an exit plan agreed where they get some investment back.

Surely everyone can get a deal that suits the City, the development, the football club and the people of Coventry. Why is everyone dancing around the issues while our football club falls into a laughing stock?

Someone remind these councillors they are not in business, they are a council body representing the interest of the taxpayers of Coventry. Do the right thing.

That should be the ideal outcome. But councillor Meyton et al think that they should hold on to it. But in my view it should be leased to the private sector providing the local authority cover their costs with interest. The council could lease at a low rate on the proviso that the new developer buys adjacent land and builds on it. This could be achieved through implementing a low lease over a longer period.

Preston Haskell in the casino last night (2 Viewers)

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency