not difficult to split the two, sisu are still scum, imagine what kind of job he'd be doing with decent owners who fund you to buy players, not loans and freebies.I’m wondering. Is it really difficult & confusing to throw praise and support on Pressley knowing he is being funded and fully supported by the owners you hate so much. Must be an odd situation for some.
not difficult to split the two, sisu are still scum, imagine what kind of job he'd be doing with decent owners who fund you to buy players, not loans and freebies.
i'll give you that one , good call.he might not be managing ccfc if not for sisu though
not difficult to split the two, sisu are still scum, imagine what kind of job he'd be doing with decent owners who fund you to buy players, not loans and freebies.
Even if those owners are allowing the management & coaching staff to achieve their goals by supporting them & their ideology?
Yeah, because those same owners have also taken the club out of its city and lumped it 30+ miles away to nobody's delight.
There's no hard rules about hate meaning you either hate everything they do or nothing after all.
the thread is about pressley and sisu.Like when we bought Freddie Eastwood you mean? Or Chris Dunn, Cody McDonald?
Why buy something if you can get something just as good for free? No point spending for the sake of it.
i think you did something like spell waggot without an F, it riled a few people and rightly so!
Like when we bought Freddie Eastwood you mean? Or Chris Dunn, Cody McDonald?
Why buy something if you can get something just as good for free? No point spending for the sake of it.
not difficult to split the two, sisu are still scum, imagine what kind of job he'd be doing with decent owners who fund you to buy players, not loans and freebies.
Imagine if they didn't listen to Ranson and brought the ground instead of paying shit like Bell, Eastwood, McSheffrey and Doyle (to name a select few) fortunes. The side Andy Thorn got relegated had an annual wage bill of 8.7 million pounds; Yeovil have a current budget of around 700k. The problem with these owners like all before them was spending magic money we didn't have, not the reverse.
Fooking hell, they get slammed if they spend money, get hammered if they don't!! I am not a SISU fan but this is just a little irrational!!
Even if those owners are allowing the management & coaching staff to achieve their goals by supporting them & their ideology?
Imagine if they didn't listen to Ranson and brought the ground instead of paying shit like Bell, Eastwood, McSheffrey and Doyle (to name a select few) fortunes. The side Andy Thorn got relegated had an annual wage bill of 8.7 million pounds; Yeovil have a current budget of around 700k. The problem with these owners like all before them was spending magic money we didn't have, not the reverse.
not difficult to split the two, sisu are still scum, imagine what kind of job he'd be doing with decent owners who fund you to buy players, not loans and freebies.
Like when we bought Freddie Eastwood you mean? Or Chris Dunn, Cody McDonald?
Why buy something if you can get something just as good for free? No point spending for the sake of it.
Looks like Dunn is now playing in the championship. Maybe take him off that list
I've no idea whether SP would be better with more funds. I gather his philosophy is on building up from youth. That's why SISU hired him. He is doing a very good job under the circumstances. Some people were calling for his head last season, seems unbelievable now.
Let's hope the terrible circumstances at the club, do not make him look elsewhere like MR.
Looks like Dunn is now playing in the championship. Maybe take him off that list
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha - - first and last game after that howler!!!!
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha - - first and last game after that howler!!!!
He was still a waste of money, I'd keep him on the lst
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha - - first and last game after that howler!!!!
This, this, this!
Been saying for ages that Sisu's 'under-investment' is a huge myth. It's bad investment that's generally been the problem. The only time they can be accused of under-investment in my opinion is the relegation season. The club was run shambolically that season, of that there's no denying.
The signs now are good that the investments are actually being properly thought through and considered. If we end up back in Coventry on a deal good for the club, I'd feel like things had moved significantly forward for the first time under Sisu.
The relegation season was outrageous
I presume you mean in wages?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?