SkyBluePower
Well-Known Member
Simms and Wright could get 30 goals between them. Makes the investing the Vic money on that pair very good business indeed.
Just as a whole, it’s only took a couple of injuries and we look v weak off the bench.Not sure what you mean by leave squad depth to chance?
Are you referring to not signing Bamford?
Just as a whole, it’s only took a couple of injuries and we look v weak off the bench.
Thankfully, there’s been v few instances where we’ve looked out of ideas, yesterday we had 5 defenders on the bench.
Compare that to Ipswich who brought on McAteer, Akpom, Azon from the bench and have Szmodics to come back into their squad. There’s certainly more depth there.
If we get a a winger or two in, that brings up the depth of the squad up leaps and bounds.
Between them?Simms and Wright could get 30 goals between them. Makes the investing the Vic money on that pair very good business indeed.
Own goalsI think we will have 6 players all on 20 goals plus
Wright
BTA
Simms
Torp
Mason-Clark
Rudoni.
Then lagging behind with only 10 goals, it will be Eccles, Saka, Thomas
That's 150 goals accounted for. No idea who's going to get the other 27.
Can’t believe he’s scored 34 or so goals for the clubFunny because Simms was probably about 50-1 top scorer 3 weeks ago, he's now about 3rd fav
Lampard said so in his post match interview, I think he might have said at least 6
Because Simms hasn't been scoring?I have put Simms,but expect it to be Wright( if the lazy git gets his finger out)because we must get some penalties soon.
And before you all start screaming that Wright doesn’t have to run around because he keeps scoring, you hypocrites never seem to say the same about Simms.
You can get 20/1 on Haji being top GS on the championship now.
Between them?
Given how may goals we've got already for the two of them to only average 15 each would be poor from here IMO. Both got 19 each (in all comps) a couple of seasons ago.
So if you’re scoring you don’t have to work hard for the team.But if you’re not scoring you do.Because Simms hasn't been scoring?
Yet Simms is 10/1 (at W.Hill, same as above Haji odds)...weird, as Haji already has more goals.
But then you see that B.Fred has Simms @ 50/1...why the massive difference for Simms ie 10/1,12/1, 40/1, and 50/1 ??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?