Especially if they have been deliberately fraudulent or incompetentSamo.
Not exactly true in the modern day, I have a limited company and I have had to give personal guarantees.
The directors of any company can be held responsible for anything the company has done.
It's a limited company, individuals within can't be held financially responsible, and it's in admin so there's no cash to be had.
we were all loving it last season when pompey went in to admin and lost 10 points and we all thought it might help us stay up.I can't help but think that the two innocent parties in this administration debacle (the fans / the players) are affected disproportionately in suffering the results of the main protagonists criminal negligence in running CCFC.
Having purchased my 49th consecutive Season Ticket and Car Park ST at the beginning of the season I naively expected a reasonable return on said investment like 23 league home games plus cup participation unaffected by outside influences.
Management staffs came and went, players were hired and fired to create at last some stability, hope and optimism certainly with the last two managers, MR and SP providing a brand of football we could only dream about last season.
This has resulted in us potentially having a reasonable chance of finishing in the top six a feat last witnessed over 40 years ago.
But a big fat NO in the form of a 10 point reduction will ensure mid table mediocracy with only pride to play for with the players and fans totally innocent of any blame whatsoever.
My point is can there/is there an alternative method of punishment that does not impinge so manifestly on player's efforts and commitment and fan's loyalty and expectations but penalises the true guilty.
Why not seek personal financial redress from individual board members/institutions/interested parties etc that directly influenced this mess and not penalise the innocent
Did it seem unfair/as unfair before it happened to us?
I used to think that the points deduction for going into admin was a bit like the league kicking a bloke when he is down - increasingly, my eyes have been opened to the cynical financial abuses used by some (by no means all) clubs - starts to make more sense
Samo.
Not exactly true in the modern day, I have a limited company and I have had to give personal guarantees.
The directors of any company can be held responsible for anything the company has done.
As its us I bet your disappointed it wasn't 20 points.
Dependng how it pans out ,we may get those next season.As its us I bet your disappointed it wasn't 20 points.
It is unfair for us, but we are looking at it from our own perspective.
Basically we've been fielding a team we can't afford, therefore we have gained an advantage over well run clubs.
As its us I bet your disappointed it wasn't 20 points.
I am serious, if enough of us got together or maybe via the Trust, I think we have a case for missrepasentation
Spencer, agreed but can you imagine the hassle it would cause cause if a 1000 season ticket holders said they were taking the owners or the FL to court?
Am sure some up and coming young lawyer would enjoy the challenge.
If we won I would feel so much better even though no money involved, but if we lost it would feel a success just to get to court.
As its us I bet your disappointed it wasn't 20 points.
I know it's just a dream but when your angry but no idea who with you look at any reason to get even.!!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?