An interesting article http://footylaw.wordpress.com/2013/...-contradictory-position-on-players-contracts/ and a reason why ACL/Higgs/CCCouncil need to stay firm and reject the CVA.
We need to get to the bottom of this.
Also worth reading the comments at the bottom - one of our pro-Sisu/anti-ACL, Higgs, CCCouncil posters torn to shreds while showing his true colours.
Go back GG. It appears you have been metaphorically downed with a flurry of meaty blows. Surely your pride compels you to return and right this serf?
OK, Ok I admit it!
He humiliated me! with a mighty swipe of his pen.
He's right of course!
all of the players are in Ltd.
I give up!
imp:
Yes. That would have been an appropriate response on the other forum
OK, Ok I admit it!
He humiliated me! with a mighty swipe of his pen.
He's right of course!
all of the players are in Ltd.
I give up!
imp:
You just don't know when I'm being serious do you?
imp:
You make the distinction hard
You just don't know when I'm being serious do you?
imp:
Did you want to argue that footyblog was right?
imp:
LOL!
I decided not to torment the guy anymore after I tor him to shreds!
(didn't you understand it?)
imp:
You just don't know when I'm being serious do you?
imp:
It could be 1-2 players or it could be the entire squad.
Exactly - in all the previous accounts CCFC Ltd was described as 'running a professional football club', it had 108 employees iirc in the 2011 accounts, and a turnover of £11m to £9m in the last three submitted accounts iirc.
Now it's a mere 'property subsidiary' with no staff or assets.
Those 108 employees could be ballboys, stewards, office workers, the kit lady and the groundstaff and not include any playing staff, or it could include the whole squad - I know where my money lies.
This needs to be out in the open, and that's why ACL/Higgs/CCCouncil should reject the CVA.
It could be that new players and contract renewals were don't in holdings and only the likes of wood and bell were in Ltd.
Holdings 2011 accounts showed employees went up by ~150 employees.
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/17823-CCFC-Holdings-Ltd-Accounts-2011
Remember this time last year when all the players had to sign new contracts, supposedly to support out the wage structure. I would be surprised if this wasn't the point at which the change was made. Maybe we should tweet Bell or one of the players who have left and see if we get an answer!
Someone who's researched better than I appears to have a view that its hard not to subscribe to. It also appears they shamed your offerings. If you can't win the debate over there, why attempt it with someone over here?
Did I lose a debate?
An interesting article http://footylaw.wordpress.com/2013/...-contradictory-position-on-players-contracts/ and a reason why ACL/Higgs/CCCouncil need to stay firm and reject the CVA.
We need to get to the bottom of this.
Also worth reading the comments at the bottom - one of our pro-Sisu/anti-ACL, Higgs, CCCouncil posters torn to shreds while showing his true colours.
Surely Appleton and the FL insolvency team needed to ensure the accounts were filed and these matters of player registrations clarified.
What is Appleton administrating does he actually understand the assets he has???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?