TewkesburySkyBlue
Well-Known Member
calm down boys.
calm down boys.You absolute shithouse c**t wtf has that got to do with racism? And btw as for city fan I was there whilst you listened to your best mate Clive the same at Fleetwood and pretty much every away game this season. I'm sticking you on mute so I won't see any more of your replies to annoy me. Have a nice time wumming and enjoy other bait.
Would you start the same 11 next game?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
He was passing it around in neat triangles with Agogo and Ogogo.Did Aogogo even touch the ball.
The formation/shape was as good as it has been all season yesterday. For the first time in a long time we created 4 or 5 genuinely good chances to score, not just 1 or 2 and the odd half chances. Yes we needed to play a little higher 2nd half but for the first time this season we had a functional plan A that will allow our better players to maximise their games rather than compensate for the weaker players.
The result was a sickener but the foundations were finally right and we have the right platform to build on - small tweaks to be made rather than a broken system.
This is a midtable side with a couple of young rough diamonds in it and an upper mid table finish will be a good effort in the context of where we were last year.
I would switch JCH for Baka next game, keeping Chaplin leading the line but ask JCH to play more central in partnership with Chaplin. We got an awful lot of crosses into the box first half with no-one to attack it.
The formation/shape was as good as it has been all season yesterday. For the first time in a long time we created 4 or 5 genuinely good chances to score, not just 1 or 2 and the odd half chances. Yes we needed to play a little higher 2nd half but for the first time this season we had a functional plan A that will allow our better players to maximise their games rather than compensate for the weaker players.
The result was a sickener but the foundations were finally right and we have the right platform to build on - small tweaks to be made rather than a broken system.
This is a midtable side with a couple of young rough diamonds in it and an upper mid table finish will be a good effort in the context of where we were last year.
I would switch JCH for Baka next game, keeping Chaplin leading the line but ask JCH to play more central in partnership with Chaplin. We got an awful lot of crosses into the box first half with no-one to attack it.
I'm not sure, I don't think JCH has the touch and the quickness that Baka seems to have. Take a touch, lay it off and then get into the box. JCH is hardly in the box for crosses when he is leading the line so to play him deeper I am not sure.
The issue then is if you play Baka where he did yesterday, who do you play in front of him?
I suspect the second half performance was partly down to Kelly's lack of match fitnessThe formation/shape was as good as it has been all season yesterday. For the first time in a long time we created 4 or 5 genuinely good chances to score, not just 1 or 2 and the odd half chances. Yes we needed to play a little higher 2nd half but for the first time this season we had a functional plan A that will allow our better players to maximise their games rather than compensate for the weaker players.
The result was a sickener but the foundations were finally right and we have the right platform to build on - small tweaks to be made rather than a broken system.
This is a midtable side with a couple of young rough diamonds in it and an upper mid table finish will be a good effort in the context of where we were last year.
I would switch JCH for Baka next game, keeping Chaplin leading the line but ask JCH to play more central in partnership with Chaplin. We got an awful lot of crosses into the box first half with no-one to attack it.
Bayliss seemed to vanish as well. He lost his head a bit first half and had a booking so not sure how much that influenced itI suspect the second half performance was partly down to Kelly's lack of match fitness
Good shout and bring Chaplin off the bench he might Nick a goal when the pressure is off him from the startI don't really think there was much wrong with how we started the game, we started really well. Only issue for me was Chaplin but who do you put there instead? Can only think of Hiwula.
The formation/shape was as good as it has been all season yesterday. For the first time in a long time we created 4 or 5 genuinely good chances to score, not just 1 or 2 and the odd half chances. Yes we needed to play a little higher 2nd half but for the first time this season we had a functional plan A that will allow our better players to maximise their games rather than compensate for the weaker players.
The result was a sickener but the foundations were finally right and we have the right platform to build on - small tweaks to be made rather than a broken system.
This is a midtable side with a couple of young rough diamonds in it and an upper mid table finish will be a good effort in the context of where we were last year.
I would switch JCH for Baka next game, keeping Chaplin leading the line but ask JCH to play more central in partnership with Chaplin. We got an awful lot of crosses into the box first half with no-one to attack it.
I don't really think there was much wrong with how we started the game, we started really well. Only issue for me was Chaplin but who do you put there instead? Can only think of Hiwula.
No, Burge didn't cost us the 3 points - if Thomas or JCH had taken their fairly simple chances to make it 2 - 0 then the Burge mistake would not have happened, or certainly wouldn't have affected the result in the way it eventually did.Did burge cost us 3 points? Yes or no? It's a simple question
Don't rise to it, he's simply a racist wumNo, Burge didn't cost us the 3 points - if Thomas or JCH had taken their fairly simple chances to make it 2 - 0 then the Burge mistake would not have happened, or certainly wouldn't have affected the result in the way it eventually did.
I find it strange that you marked Burge down to 4, for not doing his job correctly (despite the brilliant save moments before), yet gave JCH a 6 when he didn't do his job?
No, Burge didn't cost us the 3 points - if Thomas or JCH had taken their fairly simple chances to make it 2 - 0 then the Burge mistake would not have happened, or certainly wouldn't have affected the result in the way it eventually did.
I find it strange that you marked Burge down to 4, for not doing his job correctly (despite the brilliant save moments before), yet gave JCH a 6 when he didn't do his job?
I have this feeling of deja-vu all over againAny one else thinking that Ponticelli looks better and better every week, without even being in the ground. By the time he’s fit, he will be world class!
U find it strange that I marked a goalkeeper a 4 for costing us the game with a dumb mistake and also nearly being punished for similar decision making twice before in the same match?No, Burge didn't cost us the 3 points - if Thomas or JCH had taken their fairly simple chances to make it 2 - 0 then the Burge mistake would not have happened, or certainly wouldn't have affected the result in the way it eventually did.
I find it strange that you marked Burge down to 4, for not doing his job correctly (despite the brilliant save moments before), yet gave JCH a 6 when he didn't do his job?
He went off on 81 this time. Got hooked because MR was protecting him from getting a red I think - was already on a yellow and was subbed immediately after he had gone down very easily under a challenge for which no free kick was given. He got bugger all from the ref all game which was already detracting from his game and looked like he was on the verge of losing his head over it.I was at Walsall for FA Cup but not this game.
Based on some comments I read, did Bayliss fade in 2nd half?
I ask because nearly every time I have seen him he seems to fade after about 70/80 minutes.
At this stage of season he should be fit. If he's at the limit of his fitness I fear that he will not develop into the player he ought to
Thanks fot the insightHe went off on 81 this time. Got hooked because MR was protecting him from getting a red I think - was already on a yellow and was subbed immediately after he had gone down very easily under a challenge for which no free kick was given. He got bugger all from the ref all game which was already detracting from his game and looked like he was on the verge of losing his head over it.
With regards to his fitness, he didn't have to do nearly the same amount of box to box running with a more mobile Kelly behind him, particularly first half. Partially helped by Shipley's starting position too which was about 10 yards deeper than Hiwula. Would love to see his heatmap vs previous games - am sure it would be predominantly more advanced.
YesU find it strange that I marked a goalkeeper a 4 for costing us the game with a dumb mistake and also nearly being punished for similar decision making twice before in the same match?
You find it odd that I gave a subs striker a 6 and didn't mark him a 4 for missing a chance(Not an open goal) by mere inches?
Do You really find it odd? Really?
No, Burge didn't cost us the 3 points - if Thomas or JCH had taken their fairly simple chances to make it 2 - 0 then the Burge mistake would not have happened, or certainly wouldn't have affected the result in the way it eventually did.
I find it strange that you marked Burge down to 4, for not doing his job correctly (despite the brilliant save moments before), yet gave JCH a 6 when he didn't do his job?
Did burge cost us 3 points? Yes or no? It's a simple question
Lol what? 3 pts to 1 would be a 2 point loss.No. He cost us 1 point, which we would have got if we had drawn 1-1
Not sure why so many on this forum seem to think Jch missed an open goal.Thats nonsense - in terms of degree of difficulty the chance for Clarke Harris (which he created for himself) was harder than the horrendous error from Burge - it was a shocker
Gosh, it's taken you a long time to get involved in this - just watched the highlights on the TV?Thats nonsense - in terms of degree of difficulty the chance for Clarke Harris (which he created for himself) was harder than the horrendous error from Burge - it was a shocker
Gosh, it's taken you a long time to get involved in this - just watched the highlights on the TV?
You have a point, in that JCH made the chance for himself, by doing his job, but then he missed that chance which he should have scored, and Burge's attempt was a shocker, but can be balanced against the save he made a few minutes earlier that could/should have preserved the win. Both were culpable.
And what about the non-challenge by Davies on Leahy as he went up to head the ball in?
but he made a save so its ok and we should not talk about his mistakes.......It don’t help Tom Davies is flat footed back peddling but the header had no conviction to it to trouble anyone, if your keepers at home he collects easily and wastes time a little allowing us to regroup to see the game out with just another 2 or mins left of play.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?