This is where people get confused with the law. There was not enough proof to categorically state it was murder. Whether you think it was or it wasn't is irrelevant.
And yet the three men who "accidentally" shot Sabrina Moss to death in London were sentenced to 37 years each for 'murder'.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...7-years-street-gun-death-innocent-mother.html
How was Pistorious any less guilty than they were?
Not a chance he'll do any jail now I don't think......
They'll probably put an ankle tag on him so they know where he is at all times :thinking about:
Of course he will. He can still get up to 15 years.
......... Are you serious?
It's difficult for us in the UK to be objective, we don't understand their culture or gun laws, which like America are very different to ours. They way they think when someone breaks into their house if different to us.
Whether he had intensions to kill her or not, it's down to the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did.
There is every possibility that it will be significantly less than that.
Its a case I'm afraid of a white celebrity receiving significantly favourable treatment in South Africa. Hopefully if the sentence is low then the prosecutors will lodge an appeal.
Totally.
Sabrina was not the gang's "intended" victim in the same way that Pistorious claims* that Reeva was not his intended victim.
*Not that i believe him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?