Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Pistorious (7 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Mar 3, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 10, 2014
  • #36
SlowerThanPlatt said:
He's claimed the ammunition held illegally in his safe was his fathers (who he also said he doesn't communicate with).

Strangely his father has refused to make a statement to state the same.

His credibility has been destroyed today, but he's stayed rock solid on the key facts of the night.
Click to expand...

True. Except the facts in his version of events don't add up.
Everyone seems to think not guilty is coming. His defence is literally unbelievable.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 10, 2014
  • #37
Nice pay off to the judge is it?

Shouldn't he at least be done for manslaughter?

I wonder if he will end up car jacked and shot? I know if somebody had shot my daughter and walked free he would probably have an accident.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 11, 2014
  • #38
Adjourned til Monday. Their court times seem a bit odd - finishing at 2pm?!
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 11, 2014
  • #39
Nick said:
Nice pay off to the judge is it?

Shouldn't he at least be done for manslaughter?

I wonder if he will end up car jacked and shot? I know if somebody had shot my daughter and walked free he would probably have an accident.
Click to expand...

No question that he is culpable for manslaughter seeing as he readily admitted to firing the gun 4 times through the door. I'd be very surprised if he escapes any sentence.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2014
  • #40
How a man even in that position can act consistently all the way through like a little baby, it's nauseating to listen too.

Compare that to his actual voice in this BBC interview from a years back. There's definitely a difference, because even when he's answering questions calmly in court he has a whine to his voice that a clearly not there in that clip.

[video=youtube;BMTjJZ3f_bM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMTjJZ3f_bM[/video]
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 14, 2014
  • #41
Reeva's sister has argued that they shouldn't keep having these adjournments whenever OP gets emotional because "surely that's the best time for the prosecution to do their work". Which I kind of agree with.
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Apr 14, 2014
  • #42
He's more guilty than John McGuilty of Guilty Town, Guiltyshire! If he walks away from this....... oh wait, he can't can he? :thinking about:
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #43
I don't know how Mrs. Steenkamp manages to sit through this. I can barely take a few minutes of his insincere, feeble wheedling.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #44
so telling that he can't maintain any eye contact ,with the Camera and the prosecution Barrister .
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #45
I don't get why they won't show him giving evidence. He's shown throughout the rest of the proceedings. What's the difference? We should be allowed if this is the future of televised court proceedings.
 

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #46
After all his ridiculous defence, people still think he's gonna get off. Is it just cynicism?
I guess time will tell.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #47
M&B Stand said:
After all his ridiculous defence, people still think he's gonna get off. Is it just cynicism?
I guess time will tell.
Click to expand...

We are used to seeing celeb trials and they tend to go their way -- OJ, Michael Jackson -- this is a judge not a jury and I am not sure what the public feeling is for him. Either way his career is finished -- sponsors wouldn't touch him now.
 
S

smileycov

Facebook User
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #48
So if he gets found not guilty.......he is still guilty and it was a fix?
hope you lot aren't together on jury duty ha ha !!
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #49
smileycov said:
So if he gets found not guilty.......he is still guilty and it was a fix?
hope you lot aren't together on jury duty ha ha !!
Click to expand...
Or at the JR,there will be a lynching!!
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #50
Wrong topic
 
Last edited: Apr 15, 2014

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #51
SlowerThanPlatt said:
This is a pretty good graphic from the Telegraph that gives a pretty good idea of just how insanely deep that part of the ocean is

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-the-Bluefin-21-will-search-for-wreckage.html
Click to expand...

Are they holding Oscar's trial underwater, then? :thinking about:
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #52
Houchens Head said:
Are they holding Oscar's trial underwater, then? :thinking about:
Click to expand...
.

I think STP's got mixed up on his current Affairs .:thinking about:
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #53
Damn...wrong topic.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2014
  • #54
Dixon referred to the forensic report without reading the full report according to Nel who has pointed out parts of the document that Dixon is not familiar with.

Nel - "You are trying to be an expert in an area that you are not"
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2014
  • #55
I always like the give people the benefit of the doubt to start off with without judging, however it isn't looking good for him is it?

Does anyone else find it seriously hard to take the South African accent seriously? I can't help but take the piss!
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2014
  • #56
There's a complex analysis of 'proof' and 'reasonable doubt' in the context of the trial here.

http://criminallawza.net/2014/04/08/the-perplexing-problem-of-proof/

Worth reading if you want to understand the context and process better.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 17, 2014
  • #57
Dixon being carefully dismantled this morning. Some of this is almost comical. Especially with regard to the photos allegedly showing that the neighbour couldn't have seen OP at window. Nel making Dixon look like a fool.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #58
SlowerThanPlatt said:
There's a complex analysis of 'proof' and 'reasonable doubt' in the context of the trial here.

http://criminallawza.net/2014/04/08/the-perplexing-problem-of-proof/

Worth reading if you want to understand the context and process better.
Click to expand...

It is more or less impossible to have 100% proof of something. With all these things an acceptably low level of error or uncertainty is the best you can expect.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?