Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Phone In (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Oct 28, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #71
Sunken pitches, negotiating a water table, major infrastructure alterations, then constructing three more grandstands, if in the remote chance all this got through planning, where will the money come from ?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #72
rupert_bear said:
Sunken pitches, negotiating a water table, major infrastructure alterations, then constructing three more grandstands, if in the remote chance all this got through planning, where will the money come from ?
Click to expand...

They're bound to find some buried treasure when they excavate to sink the pitch, don't fret mate.
 
Reactions: Astute
P

Pipehitterz

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #73
Tonylinc said:
It's been many years since I was last at the Butts but I seem to recall that there was a track around it. If so, then I can see the advantage of "sinking". the pitch. To me however the cost of doing so would be prohibitive.
Click to expand...
Lol at many years, that old cycle track was dug up 15+ years ago.
 
P

Pipehitterz

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #74
Have no idea why people are talking about a sunken pitch at butts.
There's blocks of flats, the butts hotel, 6 story apartments , and part built stadium already, building a tall stadium round there isn't gonna alter the skyline at all
 
Reactions: wingy

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #75
Pipehitterz said:
Have no idea why people are talking about a sunken pitch at butts.
There's blocks of flats, the butts hotel, 6 story apartments , and part built stadium already, building a tall stadium round there isn't gonna alter the skyline at all
Click to expand...
People have a right to light. They would never get it passed to have a stand right next to their windows and balconies.
 
Reactions: martcov
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #76
Astute said:
People have a right to light. They would never get it passed to have a stand right next to their windows and balconies.
Click to expand...
He's got a point tbf
The frontage would be the only potential issue there and the closest flats are the other side of four lanes and at least four storeys high.
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #77
You are spot on Astute and it's about time all this was put to the council for answers so this farcicle subject can be put to bed once and for all and we can get on with getting something sorted at the Ricoh
 
Reactions: martcov
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #78
wingy said:
He's got a point tbf
The frontage would be the only potential issue there and the closest flats are the other side of four lanes and at least four storeys high.
Click to expand...

No-one is bothered about the council flats over the road. For one they don't have proper balconies. It is the modern oap flats overlooking the stadium from the side that are the problem. The idea of a sunken pitch comes from Rugby JS and/ or TF. They have already seen the complaints coming.
 
Reactions: Otis

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #79
wingy said:
He's got a point tbf
The frontage would be the only potential issue there and the closest flats are the other side of four lanes and at least four storeys high.
Click to expand...

The Aviva Stadium is a good example of that rule. The small stand looks shite.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #80
Astute said:
People have a right to light. They would never get it passed to have a stand right next to their windows and balconies.
Click to expand...

Pipehitterz said:
Have no idea why people are talking about a sunken pitch at butts.
There's blocks of flats, the butts hotel, 6 story apartments , and part built stadium already, building a tall stadium round there isn't gonna alter the skyline at all
Click to expand...
Have to agree with Astute. Have you seen just how close the retirement village is to the Butts stadium?

It is mighty close and a stand built there would restrict light for sure.

You have to remember that the stand at the Butts only holds 3,000. If we are talking about a 20,000 seater stadium or so then that stand will have to be a lot taller and the other 3 stands too.
 
Reactions: Astute and martcov
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #81
martcov said:
No-one is bothered about the council flats over the road. For one they don't have proper balconies. It is the modern oap flats overlooking the stadium from the side that are the problem. The idea of a sunken pitch comes from Rugby JS and/ or TF. They have already seen the complaints coming.
Click to expand...
Don't misread me I don't think it'll happen or is even genuine.
Yet the existing stand already backs onto the new apartments.
So I agree with pipehitters it won't fail on height, but in fantasy world it would only ever be 15k
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #82
wingy said:
Don't misread me I don't think it'll happen or is even genuine.
Yet the existing stand already backs onto the new apartments.
So I agree with pipehitters it won't fail on height, but in fantasy world it would only ever be 15k
Click to expand...

Yes, I see that, but the capacity is 3 or 4000 at the moment. They 'intend' putting in housing units, shops, training facilities. To fit all that in they need height or depth - which is why the sunken Pitch first appeared on the agenda. They would have to build bigger stands than those at present to get to 15000 and later, 25000 crowds. ( I am smiling whilst typing ). Actually even discussing this and hearing people putting forward possible positive scenarios shows how many positive scenarios we have to put together - with the best will in the world - to justify something in our own interests. Wait until the opposition wakes up - when the plans are made public - and tries to find negative points. They will have an easier job than we do.
 
Reactions: Astute, wingy and Otis

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #83
skybluetony176 said:
I'd imagine the water table is quite high in that area. Isn't there a river / stream very close by? Not sure what you would gain by it either other than a lower profile on the skyline and I don't think that's been talked about as a potential issue as of yet.
Click to expand...

Yes, the River Sherbourne runs past the Stadium & the Tech on the other side of the Butts Rd.
This is looking towards the ring road, the Butts is upstream in the other direction about 300yds.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-30446327
 
Last edited: Oct 29, 2016
Reactions: Astute

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #84
hill83 said:
There's only one thing more pointless than discussing it. And that's pointing out that it will never happen.
Click to expand...
Get used to sitting in eventual yellow and black seats at the wasp arena there won't be another stadium built in coventry. 1 sisu have no intention of it and 2 The council won't allow it. We are just tenants at the mercy of wasps. Harsh reality of the situation whether we like it or not

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Pipehitterz and clint van damme

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #85


Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #86
higgs said:
View attachment 5874

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
We will make a fortune out of the parking

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Astute

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #87
I reckon we will have to bus in the players.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #88
Otis said:
I reckon we will have to bus in the players.
Click to expand...
A bus might not fit. Might have to be a few taxis
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #89
Astute said:
A bus might not fit. Might have to be a few taxis
Click to expand...
Taxi for fisher

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #90
martcov said:
No-one is bothered about the council flats over the road. For one they don't have proper balconies. It is the modern oap flats overlooking the stadium from the side that are the problem. The idea of a sunken pitch comes from Rugby JS and/ or TF. They have already seen the complaints coming.
Click to expand...
But they are not all council just spent thousands on the uni flats there.
Infact the uni could pay for the ground with their spare change.
And even put a few more flats on it.
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #91
Fill it with water for swimming on none match days and get 365 day income
 
P

Pipehitterz

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #92
Astute said:
People have a right to light. They would never get it passed to have a stand right next to their windows and balconies.
Click to expand...
I think the law states that you do not have the right to light
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #93
Pipehitterz said:
I think the law states that you do not have the right to light
Click to expand...
You try telling that to a moth.
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?