Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Phone In (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Oct 28, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #36
If we sink it too far the council will fill it with water and turn it into a 50 metre swimming pool
 
Reactions: colin101, martcov, Astute and 5 others

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #37
Johnnythespider said:
If we sink it too far the council will fill it with water and turn it into a 50 metre swimming pool
Click to expand...

May as well have two 50 metre pools that we don't need instead of one
 
Reactions: Johnnythespider and stupot07

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #38
chiefdave said:
I've been wondering that but thought I was being stupid as nobody seemed to question it! Tried google and all I got was a piece about West Ham not being able to sink their pitch as there's radioactive waste under the olympic stadium!
Click to expand...
I think it's all to do with getting more people in isn't it. Would mean though the stands would be at a more acute angle with more fans looking down on the play.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #39
The sky is fairly empty as well and there is about as much chance building a stadium in the clouds and have Lando running it
 

vow

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #40
Fairly sure Sixfields is a sunken pitch or it might be the whole stadium?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #41
We need to stop talking about sunken pitches and start looking for sunken treasure.
 
Reactions: Astute, Johnnythespider and Terry Gibson's perm

gary_ccfcforever

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #42
That's the Stozice stadium, Slovenian National Stadium In Ljubljana, went there last year for the euro qualifier. Great little ground
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #43
It would save some space if you slanted it. Would need to be like a 45 degree angle though, not sure you'd get that pitch past the FA.

Terry Gibson's perm said:
The sky is fairly empty as well and there is about as much chance building a stadium in the clouds and have Lando running it
Click to expand...

Now there's a starter.

Something like this:

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #44
How high up does the council have jurisdiction over?
 

KG7

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #45
The Ricoh has a sunken pitch


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Brylowes

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #46
shmmeee said:
How high up does the council have jurisdiction over?
Click to expand...


Well obviously high, but it will be higher still if there is a sunken pitch.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #47
Sinking the pitch does not create any more room for bigger stands.
It just lowers the height of the stands.
Simple maths.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #48
italiahorse said:
Sinking the pitch does not create any more room for bigger stands.
It just lowers the height of the stands.
Simple maths.
Click to expand...
Okay.

My thinking was that you could have taller stands and that due to the pitch being sunken that the stands would be taller, but just therefore be the same height as a normal stand.
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue

The Reverend Skyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #49
Otis said:
Okay.

My thinking was that you could have taller stands and that due to the pitch being sunken that the stands would be taller, but just therefore be the same height as a normal stand.
Click to expand...

Don't listen to the Wasps PR rep AKA Italia, , you sink the pitch you can have bigger steeper stands just like in Germany.
Italia is pissed off because there is limited car parking he can exploit, due to Wasps not being involved.
Simple Maths
 
Reactions: clint van damme and vow
G

georgehudson

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #50
Imho, it's a non-starter, the river Sherbourne water table level is approx 6ft below the present BPA pitch,
perhaps TF is musing over some Fishermans Blues,
imho, is it not about time he found something useful to do !
Answers on a post card to;
Divide & Conquer; c/o CCFC
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #51
georgehudson said:
Imho, it's a non-starter, the river Sherbourne water table level is approx 6ft below the present BPA pitch,
perhaps TF is musing over some Fishermans Blues,
imho, is it not about time he found something useful to do !
Answers on a post card to;
Divide & Conquer; c/o CCFC
Click to expand...
Shouldn't that be divine and conquer?
 
C

CCFC54321

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #52
There can never be an expansion to the BPA as the road infrastructure is not sufficient to allow 20,000 people through that area. My understanding is the highways agency have an involvement and a stong influence on any decision to expand capacity there. I'm sure that in the case of an accident any emergency services need access to the road. The road is gridlocked on a Saturday afternoon without football traffic.

It just cant happen due to many obstacles with the BPA.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #53
The Reverend Skyblue said:
Don't listen to the Wasps PR rep AKA Italia, , you sink the pitch you can have bigger steeper stands just like in Germany.
Italia is pissed off because there is limited car parking he can exploit, due to Wasps not being involved.
Simple Maths
Click to expand...

Its not Wasps magic it's simple maths.
The stands could be higher but the angle would increase for seating.
A 33,000 seater stadium would require climbing equipment to get to your seats.
But you go on believing the hype.
Go outdoors sells cheap climbing rope so get in quick before it sells out.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #54
CCFC54321 said:
There can never be an expansion to the BPA as the road infrastructure is not sufficient to allow 20,000 people through that area. My understanding is the highways agency have an involvement and a stong influence on any decision to expand capacity there. I'm sure that in the case of an accident any emergency services need access to the road. The road is gridlocked on a Saturday afternoon without football traffic.

It just cant happen due to many obstacles with the BPA.
Click to expand...
Many of us have been saying that for months, but hey ho!

Smoke and mirrors.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #55
rupert_bear said:
I think Barcelona created another tier by sinking their pitch might be wrong though
Click to expand...
It's all the rage in Kensington and Chelsea.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #56
italiahorse said:
Its not Wasps magic it's simple maths.
The stands could be higher but the angle would increase for seating.
A 33,000 seater stadium would require climbing equipment to get to your seats.
But you go on believing the hype.
Go outdoors sells cheap climbing rope so get in quick before it sells out.
Click to expand...
We could all go on an abseiling course
Have to say I think the back rows would sell out first.
 
Reactions: vow

vow

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #57
wingy said:
We could all go on an abseiling course
Have to say I think the back rows would sell out first.
Click to expand...
Was that an intended pun?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #58
vow said:
Was that an intended pun?
Click to expand...
Nah
Now I think of it though.
All the old and frail to the back in this case,all the singers at the front
God oh how it's changed over the last 50 yrs.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #59
Otis said:
My thinking was that you could have taller stands and that due to the pitch being sunken that the stands would be taller, but just therefore be the same height as a normal stand.
Click to expand...
That's pretty much it from what I can find. If you're likely to hit problems with getting permission for the height of stands you can dig down and start lower.
 
Reactions: martcov and Otis

Wheelfass

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #60
KG7 said:
The Ricoh has a sunken pitch


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You're absolutely right. The concourses at the rear of the stands at the Ricoh are at street level. The vomitories (a unfortunate name) or entrances to the inside of the stadium, although accessed by several steps up from the concourse, give a reasonable idea of the distance the pitch has been laid below street level.
 
Last edited: Oct 28, 2016
Reactions: KG7

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #61
KG7 said:
The Ricoh has a sunken pitch


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
You're absolutely right, enter at ground level and climb about 12 or so steps, then emerge
Half way up, about 40 steps up from pitch level, definitely a sunken pitch.
 
Reactions: KG7
1

1940oldfive

Active Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #62
Tonylinc said:
Nah Otis Sisu will employ one bloke with a digger
Click to expand...
tiny tim has been digging a hole for himself for years
 
Reactions: Astute

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #63
The Reverend Skyblue said:
Don't listen to the Wasps PR rep AKA Italia, , you sink the pitch you can have bigger steeper stands just like in Germany.
Italia is pissed off because there is limited car parking he can exploit, due to Wasps not being involved.
Simple Maths
Click to expand...

So it doesn't save any footprint, which is the issue with the Butts. You could have the same stands at ground level, they'd just go higher.

It's in the middle of several high rise developments, I doubt height is the issue.

God damn Wasps loving physics!

I hear biology is in a conspiracy with the council too!
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #64
shmmeee said:
So it doesn't save any footprint, which is the issue with the Butts. You could have the same stands at ground level, they'd just go higher.

It's in the middle of several high rise developments, I doubt height is the issue.

God damn Wasps loving physics!

I hear biology is in a conspiracy with the council too!
Click to expand...

I think the height is a problem. The OAP flats have balconies and are not cheap. Someone will object. That is why the sunken pitch idea has already been mentioned. The potential flooding has also been mentioned before.
 
Reactions: Astute and Otis

higgs

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #65
Guess what guys sisu will never build a stadium for us. Pointless even discussing it its all bull poo

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #66
martcov said:
I think the height is a problem. The OAP flats have balconies and are not cheap. Someone will object. That is why the sunken pitch idea has already been mentioned. The potential flooding has also been mentioned before.
Click to expand...
Exactly. There is very much the issue of eyeline with the retirement village (a posh retirement village at that) and blockage of view and light.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #67
higgs said:
Guess what guys sisu will never build a stadium for us. Pointless even discussing it its all bull poo

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

There's only one thing more pointless than discussing it. And that's pointing out that it will never happen.
 
Reactions: Astute

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #68
hill83 said:
There's only one thing more pointless than discussing it. And that's pointing out that it will never happen.
Click to expand...
And there's only one more thing more pointless than someone pointing out that it is pointless and that is someone pointing out that it is pointless pointing it out.
 
Reactions: Astute and hill83

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #69
hill83 said:
There's only one thing more pointless than discussing it. And that's pointing out that it will never happen.
Click to expand...

or stating which of the two is most pointless.
 
Reactions: Astute and hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #70
Otis said:
And there's only one more thing more pointless than someone pointing out that it is pointless and that is someone pointing out that it is pointless pointing it out.
Click to expand...

clint van damme said:
or stating which of the two is most pointless.
Click to expand...

What is your point?
 
Reactions: wingy
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?