Phil Townsend inquest (1 Viewer)

Nick said:

You could say that, but then the BBC got involved as well didn't they?

Click to expand...

Ian1779 said:

We are also in the area of who is pushing the story. LR is the one suggesting the story is more than what it is, with the CET suppressing.

I would hypothesise that if it was LR suppressing the story and CET trying to expose it that some people's standpoint may be a tad different.

Click to expand...

Grendel said:

Yes the BBC are definitely viewing this as a newsworthy item.

Click to expand...

eastwoodsdustman said:

Story is more than what it is? A person in public office mortgaging a third party property for his own means. His company closing owing hundreds of thousanads of pounds and his somewhat mysterious or unusual death. I'd say its a fairly big bit of news really. Not something that should be swept under the carpet if you excuse the term.

Click to expand...

armybike said:

So, lets cut to the chase - does the reading of the body language offer any evidential benefit to the process?

Click to expand...

chiefdave said:

Out of interest what benefit to the process do you believe not bothering to even speak to the person accused gives?

Click to expand...