D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I'd also like to know how saying SISU have failed is being up Fisher's backside.
If that is, God help his enemies!
NW-- go and do one, and get back up Fishers' back side
Surely it's not that complicated.
For the club to be for sale the club has to be in administration and Mr Haskell has to speak to the Asministrator.
In order to buy half of ACL Mr Haskell has to talk to the Higgs charity.
Not sure where this why doesn't ACL talk to SISU thing fits in?
If Mr Haskell get CCFC but not half of ACL ( not likely)
He takes over the administrators role and talks to ACL.
FL require the club have a place to play for at least the next 10 years. That is the crucial point.
ACL won't negotiate with sisu, they want PH4 to replace sisu.
Sisu want to move away for a while and build a new stadium.
PH4 has tabled a bid for half the ACL and will thereby secure the lease and a venue to play at for at least the next 10 years.
It looks like ACL/PH4 hold the upper hand.
Will be interesting to hear what Appelton recommend.
If SISU buy the club they need an agreement with ACL too, so why won't ACL speak to them on that basis? In fact as the major creditors it's in SISU's interests for a deal to be done, so why wouldn't ACL extend the same courtesy to an organisation that has a vested interest in the club, that they have extended to someone who has not.
That is my point, that I don;t like politics being played with my football club.
If SISU buy the club they need an agreement with ACL too, so why won't ACL speak to them on that basis? In fact as the major creditors it's in SISU's interests for a deal to be done, so why wouldn't ACL extend the same courtesy to an organisation that has a vested interest in the club, that they have extended to someone who has not.
That is my point, that I don't like politics being played with my football club.
Anyway, I'll shut up now until I can listen again on iplayer
If SISU buy the club they need an agreement with ACL too, so why won't ACL speak to them on that basis? In fact as the major creditors it's in SISU's interests for a deal to be done, so why wouldn't ACL extend the same courtesy to an organisation that has a vested interest in the club, that they have extended to someone who has not.
That is my point, that I don't like politics being played with my football club.
Anyway, I'll shut up now until I can listen again on iplayer
You make it sound like Sisu have not been given the opportunity during their how many years tenure ?
The most important part of JE's comment was:
“Sisu are the biggest creditor so we fully appreciate that Sisu could buy Limited.”
I fully expect SISU to re-purchase Ltd without spending a penny, simply by converting some or all of their secured debt into equity. I would be surprised if PHIV has bid enough to pay off SISU's secured debt, which is what would be needed for PHIV to obtain control of Ltd. There may be some prospect of SISU throwing in the towel if the FL do not agree to a move or if they require SISU to pay a bond for a temporary move. However, there has not been much sign so far of SISU giving up or the FL growing a backbone.
Sorry to p!$$ on everyone's chips.
My point is ACL have said they will only speak to the administrator in dealings about the football club.
This is patently untrue, if they will speak to someone not connected with the football club.
I don't want them putting the failures of the past back at the club anymore then I want the failures of the present there. It's not their place to do so and if they won't extend the same and the club moves out of the city, they had the chance to stop it if they stopped playing silly buggers as much as SISU had.
If SISU buy the club they need an agreement with ACL too, so why won't ACL speak to them on that basis? In fact as the major creditors it's in SISU's interests for a deal to be done, so why wouldn't ACL extend the same courtesy to an organisation that has a vested interest in the club, that they have extended to someone who has not.
That is my point, that I don't like politics being played with my football club.
Anyway, I'll shut up now until I can listen again on iplayer
More one sided garbage !
Because sisu are cunts and nobody wants them here. What part of that are you struggling with ffs.
Stop pretending for one minute you are just an impartial supporter, it's just not washing with anyone !
Stop pretending for one minute you are just an impartial supporter, it's just not washing with anyone !
We've all read your posts for weeks they are so thinly disguised its laughable !
on CWR now, creditors report submitted by administrators only creditors can view it, administrator will not talk live on radio, no coment on bid will not be drawn on which part of the club has golden share in it
What part of "I don't want them putting the failures of the past back at the club anymore then I want the failures of the present there" is one sided?
Les Reid has tweeted a report goes to creditors and Companies House today, but it can take 5 days to be published on website. He said Appleton statement due this evening, but he (Reid) hopes to get a story out this afternoon.
So essentially, nothing is going to be revealed today after all? We should have had the date of 21st May circled in our diaries rather than the 16th!
If you follow NW threads from the start , and look when he/she started posting... the picture is very clear
There are people in the world other than an American property developer and two former directors of the club who failed in their last spells there.
There are people in the world other than an investment fund that failed in their spell here.
I'd like to see what all the options are before backing one so other options are closed off.
It'll be leaked, mark my words!
Les Reid also tweeting that SISU have put in a bid.
Totally agree. We rushed in with SISU, and look how that's worked out. The more people who are interested in bidding for us the better, right?
If you follow NW threads from the start , and look when he/she started posting... the picture is very clear
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?