Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter LastGarrison
  • Start date Nov 10, 2020
Forums New posts

Will you willingly have the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine?

  • Yes

    Votes: 39 76.5%
  • No

    Votes: 5 9.8%
  • Unsure

    Votes: 7 13.7%

  • Total voters
    51
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 11, 2020
  • #71
Nick said:
Are Thalidomide jokes frowned up now?
Click to expand...
They're pretty 'armless when all is said and done
 
Reactions: Nick and clint van damme

Nick

Administrator
  • Nov 11, 2020
  • #72
fernandopartridge said:
They're pretty 'armless when all is said and done
Click to expand...
Fuck sake, stealing my thunder
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 11, 2020
  • #73
fernandopartridge said:
They're pretty 'armless when all is said and done
Click to expand...
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #74
fernandopartridge said:
They're pretty 'armless when all is said and done
Click to expand...
What’s the smallest pub in the world?

The Thalidomide Arms.
 
Reactions: hill83, shmmeee and clint van damme
O

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #75
Ian1779 said:
A question for the science bods - would this be classed as a ‘live’ vaccine? The reason I ask is that I might have mentioned my daughter is on immuno-suppressants and when we enquired about a flu vaccination for this winter, we were told she couldn’t have the ‘live’ version of it (the nasal spray) so would have to have a jab instead.
Click to expand...
The Valneva vaccine in the table that @Bugsy posted earlier in the thread appears to be an inactivated live virus. I have never heard of Valneva, but it's possibly a recent merger of companies that were more widely-known (note that these mergers and name changes often happen as a result of a knock to their capital due to failure of a drug in their advanced pipeline).

The childhood seasonal flu vaccine given as a nasal spray is what is known as a "live attenuated virus". This is a strain of the virus which has been modified such that it is biologically incapable of causing the normal infection. However, as you know from your daughter, people who have a compromised immune system for whatever reason are still at risk of developing the disease from these attenuated strains (as they are for many bacteria and viruses that the "well" population live with quite happily all the time), so they are "contra-indicated". This is a little perverse, in my view, since someone who is immunocompromised is at higher risk from the disease too.

The adult (injected) seasonal flu vaccine is an inactivated live virus (in the same mould as the Valneva offering appears to be). This means that they take the live virus, and inactivate it by a chemical method (usually) to render it supposedly incapable of causing the disease. My beef with these is that the inactivation process is not always perfect - it is based on so-called "lab validation" tests of the method, which are certified as reducing the level of live virus by a defined number of orders of magnitude (factors of 10). Hence the Domestos claim "kills 99.99% of bacteria" - a 10,000-fold reduction or "4 log kill", as it's known.
I don't know what log kill they require to prove an inactivated live vaccine is safe to use, but i know of a number of people who have had VERY flu-like symptoms in some years, so i would prefer to put my trust in biological rather than chemical inactivation.

The two vaccines that are seemingly in the lead in the race for Covid-19 (Pfizer & AstraZeneca) are neither of these things - they are nothing more than the coronavirus coat protein ("Spike") in various forms. The Spike protein on its own cannot cause disease (as far as the overwhelming body of evidence goes). The only question i would ask from your daughter's perspective is what is the chance of the remaining parts of the Adenovirus (AstraZeneca vaccine) genome being able to cause an adenovirus (common cold) infection. I believe it would be extremely low, but i don't know the precise details of the modification that they are using. The ones which are totally "gutted" are extremely tough to grow in large quantities, so i would suggest they have gone with an E1-E3 deleted one. The other thing to note is that the Adenovirus backbone they are using is from a virus that causes disease in chimpanzees, and almost certainly can't in humans. But we may have heard about viruses jumping species already somewhere in this saga.

Sorry for the wordy response, but hope this helps - i'd be putting my daughter forward if i was in your position, as the risk from Covid-19 to her is probably quite high.
 
Reactions: shmmeee, Ian1779 and fernandopartridge

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #76
OffenhamSkyBlue said:
The Valneva vaccine in the table that @Bugsy posted earlier in the thread appears to be an inactivated live virus. I have never heard of Valneva, but it's possibly a recent merger of companies that were more widely-known (note that these mergers and name changes often happen as a result of a knock to their capital due to failure of a drug in their advanced pipeline).

The childhood seasonal flu vaccine given as a nasal spray is what is known as a "live attenuated virus". This is a strain of the virus which has been modified such that it is biologically incapable of causing the normal infection. However, as you know from your daughter, people who have a compromised immune system for whatever reason are still at risk of developing the disease from these attenuated strains (as they are for many bacteria and viruses that the "well" population live with quite happily all the time), so they are "contra-indicated". This is a little perverse, in my view, since someone who is immunocompromised is at higher risk from the disease too.

The adult (injected) seasonal flu vaccine is an inactivated live virus (in the same mould as the Valneva offering appears to be). This means that they take the live virus, and inactivate it by a chemical method (usually) to render it supposedly incapable of causing the disease. My beef with these is that the inactivation process is not always perfect - it is based on so-called "lab validation" tests of the method, which are certified as reducing the level of live virus by a defined number of orders of magnitude (factors of 10). Hence the Domestos claim "kills 99.99% of bacteria" - a 10,000-fold reduction or "4 log kill", as it's known.
I don't know what log kill they require to prove an inactivated live vaccine is safe to use, but i know of a number of people who have had VERY flu-like symptoms in some years, so i would prefer to put my trust in biological rather than chemical inactivation.

The two vaccines that are seemingly in the lead in the race for Covid-19 (Pfizer & AstraZeneca) are neither of these things - they are nothing more than the coronavirus coat protein ("Spike") in various forms. The Spike protein on its own cannot cause disease (as far as the overwhelming body of evidence goes). The only question i would ask from your daughter's perspective is what is the chance of the remaining parts of the Adenovirus (AstraZeneca vaccine) genome being able to cause an adenovirus (common cold) infection. I believe it would be extremely low, but i don't know the precise details of the modification that they are using. The ones which are totally "gutted" are extremely tough to grow in large quantities, so i would suggest they have gone with an E1-E3 deleted one. The other thing to note is that the Adenovirus backbone they are using is from a virus that causes disease in chimpanzees, and almost certainly can't in humans. But we may have heard about viruses jumping species already somewhere in this saga.

Sorry for the wordy response, but hope this helps - i'd be putting my daughter forward if i was in your position, as the risk from Covid-19 to her is probably quite high.
Click to expand...

Thank you - it’s certainly really helpful. I would definitely want her to have the vaccine, I’m not sure where she fits in the order of priority as it’s very adults focused from what we’ve seen so far.

At the moment she is in the ‘vulnerable’ category - but not the clinically extremely vulnerable one (she can still attend school) so they believe less risk than what was originally thought in the summer. They’ve also reduced the proportion of her immune-suppressant medication which will also make things a bit better hopefully.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #77
Here's me making sure it's OK to crack a joke and every other fucker jumps in and cracks them.

Political Correctness gone mad.
 
Reactions: jimmyhillsfanclub
M

Macca1987

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #78
One for the more knowledgeable on here, I'm coming up to 60, no health problems and would take the vaccine if offered, my only worry is how quick this is coming to market. I've seen several representations of how drugs are brought to market and most tend to span several years before a release to the general public, as I say my only worry is the rush on this one, happy for people in the know to put my mind at rest
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #79
Nick said:
Here's me making sure it's OK to crack a joke and every other fucker jumps in and cracks them.

Political Correctness gone mad.
Click to expand...

Ha ha.....you're just too WOKE for you're own good Nick
 
Reactions: wingy and Nick
O

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #80
Macca1987 said:
One for the more knowledgeable on here, I'm coming up to 60, no health problems and would take the vaccine if offered, my only worry is how quick this is coming to market. I've seen several representations of how drugs are brought to market and most tend to span several years before a release to the general public, as I say my only worry is the rush on this one, happy for people in the know to put my mind at rest
Click to expand...
I'm absolutely convinced that medicines, vaccines and the like that come to market in the UK (particularly those which have been through development in the UK) are safe, and the data from Phase III clinical trials seen by the oversight body (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authoity, MHRA) will indicate any concerns.

But that is my personal stance, based on my background in scientific research and now in biosecurity.
 
Reactions: LastGarrison, shmmeee, fernandopartridge and 1 other person

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #81
OffenhamSkyBlue said:
I'm absolutely convinced that medicines, vaccines and the like that come to market in the UK (particularly those which have been through development in the UK) are safe, and the data from Phase III clinical trials seen by the oversight body (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authoity, MHRA) will indicate any concerns.

But that is my personal stance, based on my background in scientific research and now in biosecurity.
Click to expand...

Aye, in my head as well the comparisons with other vaccines are false - i doubt there has ever been such an urgent requirement for a vaccine with such funding available for R&D, of course things would be quicker
 
Reactions: shmmeee and OffenhamSkyBlue
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #82
Macca1987 said:
One for the more knowledgeable on here, I'm coming up to 60, no health problems and would take the vaccine if offered, my only worry is how quick this is coming to market. I've seen several representations of how drugs are brought to market and most tend to span several years before a release to the general public, as I say my only worry is the rush on this one, happy for people in the know to put my mind at rest
Click to expand...
I know it's slightly perverse, but I've been reassured whenever they've paused trials etc. It shows they are still following process, just turbocharged.
 
Reactions: Ian1779, OffenhamSkyBlue, hill83 and 1 other person
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #83
OffenhamSkyBlue said:
I'm absolutely convinced that medicines, vaccines and the like that come to market in the UK (particularly those which have been through development in the UK) are safe, and the data from Phase III clinical trials seen by the oversight body (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authoity, MHRA) will indicate any concerns.

But that is my personal stance, based on my background in scientific research and now in biosecurity.
Click to expand...

Would be good to shoot science with you at some point OSB
 
Reactions: OffenhamSkyBlue

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #84
LastGarrison said:
What’s the smallest pub in the world?

The Thalidomide Arms.
Click to expand...

That’s arguably in my top 5 jokes. Actually not even arguably. It’s top 5.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #85
I would take it. Because of my history I had to shield from March and got the letter from the Gov telling me not to go out as I'm classed as CEV. In the grand scheme of things I presume I would be behind NHS Workers and the elderly in getting it.

I get the flu jab every year too. I just think of it as something else I would need to have.
 
Reactions: wingy and OffenhamSkyBlue

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #86
Nick said:
Here's me making sure it's OK to crack a joke and every other fucker jumps in and cracks them.

Political Correctness gone mad.
Click to expand...
Its ALWAYS okay to crack a joke. Ricky Gervais once said, if you think of something funny, dont waste it by not saying it!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 

pastythegreat

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #87
Macca1987 said:
One for the more knowledgeable on here, I'm coming up to 60, no health problems and would take the vaccine if offered, my only worry is how quick this is coming to market. I've seen several representations of how drugs are brought to market and most tend to span several years before a release to the general public, as I say my only worry is the rush on this one, happy for people in the know to put my mind at rest
Click to expand...
Whats surprising me, is the ammount of people who class themselves as the "vulnerable" category, that are petrified of this unknown virus, but would jump at the chance to have an unknown injection put directly in to their system! With no knowledge of the injection or any side effects they'll happily roll their sleeve up!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: fatso

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #88
That's what the trials are for though, to test the injection and look for side effects. Nobody's having anything that isn't approved safe
 
Reactions: shmmeee and OffenhamSkyBlue

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #89
pastythegreat said:
Its ALWAYS okay to crack a joke. Ricky Gervais once said, if you think of something funny, dont waste it by not saying it!

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Why has he never bothered to say anything funny then?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #90
ajsccfc said:
That's what the trials are for though, to test the injection and look for side effects. Nobody's having anything that isn't approved safe
Click to expand...
Yup.


I know that medics have pointed out the virus is REMARKABLY DANGEROUS.

I know that medics will have passed any vaccine.

We already have vaccines for TB, flu etc. Smallpox is the only disease eradicated, and that was by vaccine.

Therefore, I'll trust the people with the expertise that I don't have. There is, as always, a risk. But the risk is relatively small.

Ultimately, you have to trust people with expertise!
 
Reactions: RedSalmon

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #91
ajsccfc said:
That's what the trials are for though, to test the injection and look for side effects. Nobody's having anything that isn't approved safe
Click to expand...
But the trials will be over, in less than 6 months, what if there is a long term issue?
That's what worries some buggers.
 
Reactions: pastythegreat

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #92
Deleted member 5849 said:
Yup.


I know that medics have pointed out the virus is REMARKABLY DANGEROUS.

I know that medics will have passed any vaccine.

We already have vaccines for TB, flu etc. Smallpox is the only disease eradicated, and that was by vaccine.

Therefore, I'll trust the people with the expertise that I don't have. There is, as always, a risk. But the risk is relatively small.

Ultimately, you have to trust people with expertise!
Click to expand...

Bored of experts m8
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #93
fatso said:
But the trials will be over, in less than 6 months, what if there is a long term issue?
That's what worries some buggers.
Click to expand...

I know exactly what you mean. But for me weighing it up and what we already do know about Covid, (and still don’t know about the long term affects) it’s a risk I’ll be taking. Fuck it. I’ll be nervous though don’t get me wrong.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, fatso and Deleted member 5849

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #94
Deleted member 5849 said:
Yup.


I know that medics have pointed out the virus is REMARKABLY DANGEROUS.

I know that medics will have passed any vaccine.

We already have vaccines for TB, flu etc. Smallpox is the only disease eradicated, and that was by vaccine.

Therefore, I'll trust the people with the expertise that I don't have. There is, as always, a risk. But the risk is relatively small.

Ultimately, you have to trust people with expertise!
Click to expand...

It's testament to previous generations that the .managed to improve life expectancy and infant mortality without having YouTube, Facebook and Twitter to impart them the neccessary expertise.

The medical profession had decades of extremely good luck before they came along.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #95
fatso said:
But the trials will be over, in less than 6 months, what if there is a long term issue?
That's what worries some buggers.
Click to expand...


There's always that with any medication, but it's a risk vs reward that at the moment seems to be leaning heavier towards the latter.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #96
There was a scientist on R4 this morning, had experience with vaccines and was answering questions about safety. Few things he said (not all mentioned in this thread, but just in case):

- It doesn’t alter your DNA. The confusion is because it’s an RNA based vaccine
- The same trials with the same number of people for the same time have been done as would be done with any vaccine. It’s quicker because we’ve pumped money into it and run things in parallel where possible
- There’s already tens of thousands of people out there with the vaccine. Any issues that might appear in general rollout would be spotted quickly.
- It’s virtually unheard of for side effects to happen after a year so he’s not concerned about the fact that it’s only been developed in the last year

Overall the message seems to be its as safe as any other medicine. That doesn’t mean there’s definitely no issues but that’s always the case until you get to mass usage but all signs are it’s fine.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, OffenhamSkyBlue, RedSalmon and 2 others

Nick

Administrator
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #97
hill83 said:
Bored of experts m8
Click to expand...
You still keep coming back here
 
Reactions: hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #98
Nick said:
You still keep coming back here
Click to expand...

I need to see if you’d two foot the situation before I can form my own opinion.
 
Reactions: RedSalmon and Nick

Nick

Administrator
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #99
hill83 said:
I need to see if you’d two foot the situation before I can form my own opinion.
Click to expand...
Life would be so much simpler.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #100
If we gave covid an early reducer and set our stall out we'd all be allowed in shoe shops by now.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, hill83, Deleted member 5849 and 1 other person

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #101
ajsccfc said:
If we gave covid an early reducer and set our stall out we'd all be allowed in shoe shops by now.
Click to expand...
We just need to learn how to be more streetwise.
 
Reactions: hill83 and Nick
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #102
I will have it as soon as I am invited to. It will protect me from the virus and help protect the rest of the population. The sooner most people have it the sooner we can all get back to something like normal, including going to football matches.

I trust the scientists rather than conspiracy theorists. Nothing is risk free but I am in no doubt the risk presented by having the vaccine is ridulously low compared to the risk of the virus. I think some people forget that it is not just about those who die from covid but also those who are severely harmed by it.

I know there has been a trend in recent years to denigrate experts but I am hoping the defeat of Trump is the start of people being more rational. But covid is too important an issue for silly political posturing so please do have the vaccine when you can.
 
Reactions: clint van damme, hill83 and OffenhamSkyBlue
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 12, 2020
  • #103
torchomatic said:
I would take it. Because of my history I had to shield from March and got the letter from the Gov telling me not to go out as I'm classed as CEV. In the grand scheme of things I presume I would be behind NHS Workers and the elderly in getting it.

I get the flu jab every year too. I just think of it as something else I would need to have.
Click to expand...
How you doing stranger?
Good to see you on here .
Get back into that music thread and give us some electronic soundtracks etc .
 
Reactions: torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 13, 2020
  • #104
wingy said:
How you doing stranger?
Good to see you on here .
Get back into that music thread and give us some electronic soundtracks etc .
Click to expand...

Thanks Wingy. Yes, not been on here quite so much over the summer and beyond. Will try and make amends.
 
Reactions: clint van damme and wingy
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?