I don't understand how we could of had a good game when they dominated the match and had far more possession than us and way more shots
I think people are forgetting Yeovil were the only team to put the ball into the net TWICE, even though it was disallowedWell we didn't deserve to lose and we didn't, we had the better chances but defensive side needs more work I think.
My main question about AT involves the pace and movement in the side. Whatever formation he adopts can he get his players doing what every successful side does when it has the ball...move the ball swiftly and accurately, move into space and outmanoeuvre your opponents? Exactly what you tell 9 yr olds.
Can AT get our players moving fluently? I have seen no evidence over the past year that he can. It is all slow and static. It doesn't matter whether you play 442 or 4231 or whatever, players must pass and move. To me, he is more interested in shape and how we nullify the opposition when they have the ball.
My main question about AT involves the pace and movement in the side. Whatever formation he adopts can he get his players doing what every successful side does when it has the ball...move the ball swiftly and accurately, move into space and outmanoeuvre your opponents? Exactly what you tell 9 yr olds.
Can AT get our players moving fluently? I have seen no evidence over the past year that he can. It is all slow and static. It doesn't matter whether you play 442 or 4231 or whatever, players must pass and move. To me, he is more interested in shape and how we nullify the opposition when they have the ball.
I didn't go but it sounds to me we had the better chances maybe if Fleck had lasted
people will start o get behind he team instead of slagging of Thorn all h time whilst never going to game and knowing it ll from watching Andy Gray and Gary Linaker and Alan Hansan who have managed how many teams?
PUSB
Do like that, " I didn't go" followed by slagging off people who didn't go.
Schizophrenic at all?
Get the ball forward quickly in Thornspeak = Hoof it
Consequence it comes straight back as possession is conceded.
But he also said we'd "get it down and play" still at the forum. Seems he's confused the players as much as he has me!
I was there, so a few observations to throw into the mix...well thats the first report I ve read of us playing well ! Everything I ve heard, read upto now was we were poor.
The possession/ shots stats point to us being poor. Yeovil a good side, well they are one of the relegation favourites.
Could it be tactics that are wrong again today, as all of last season.
pusb
The most odd thing he said at the forum was that he saw little value in looking how the opposition are likely to play.
Did he really say that?!
He said he wasn't going to be worrying about the opposition and people spend too much time on things like that. I suspect on this he is a man of his word.
I`ll give AT at least 10 games , and see if we need changes then , but from what i saw yesterday nothing has changed on the field from last season ,( by the way Huish tidy little ground , but a bugger to get away from after the match must be devil of a place in mid winter as away end completley open behind goal .)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?