RoboCCFC90
Well-Known Member
He's not a striker, he's a LW who can also play in the number 10 role.
He's not a striker, he's a LW who can also play in the number 10 role.Am I missing something? He's a less than 1 in 6 striker, spent most of his career in the championship, now he's 33 and just been released by an MLS side?
It's like we're back in L1/L2 again. I'd rather keep BTA.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
He’s not a striker? Plays as a tenAm I missing something? He's a less than 1 in 6 striker, spent most of his career in the championship, now he's 33 and just been released by an MLS side?
It's like we're back in L1/L2 again. I'd rather keep BTA.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
Am I missing something? He's a less than 1 in 6 striker, spent most of his career in the championship, now he's 33 and just been released by an MLS side?
It's like we're back in L1/L2 again. I'd rather keep BTA.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
Skint
BizarreThe plan is for him to be more box to box
Am I missing something? He's a less than 1 in 6 striker, spent most of his career in the championship, now he's 33 and just been released by an MLS side?
It's like we're back in L1/L2 again. I'd rather keep BTA.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
But but we have Rudoni for that role. Play the 33 year old as the ten who can stay more up field with Simms holding up for him?The plan is for him to be more box to box
Crikey. We really are desperate.The plan is for him to be more box to box
Or MaguireThis signing smells like Waghorn
O'Hare was a box to box player TBFCrikey. We really are desperate.
So our Hamer replacement is a 33 year old Winger/Number 10, who couldn’t get a game in the MLS but it’s ok as he’s a good Cov lad
Was he ?O'Hare was a box to box player TBF
O’Hare had one of the best natural work rates I’ve ever seen. He also didn’t do much work in our own penalty box. I’ve no idea why we’d expect a post-MLS Jamie Paterson to start now.O'Hare was a box to box player TBF
Of a fashion, probably not in the traditional way thoughWas he ?
Not remotely similar players.
I partly agree with you SBT, but that being said FL will have seen a lot of Paterson on the training ground in the last seven days, I am sure if he is signing him it's based on what he can see on the training ground and where he think's Paterson might play a part.O’Hare had one of the best natural work rates I’ve ever seen. He also didn’t do much work in our own penalty box. I’ve no idea why we’d expect a post-MLS Jamie Paterson to start now.
Or we haven't got a pot to piss in and he's the cheapest available option?I partly agree with you SBT, but that being said FL will have seen a lot of Paterson on the training ground in the last seven days, I am sure if he is signing him it's based on what he can see on the training ground and where he think's Paterson might play a part.
I can see how he’d fit in as an experienced replacement for Palmer’s minutes at AM, but he clearly has a lot of work to do to get match fit, and hopefully he’d take a wage cut.I partly agree with you SBT, but that being said FL will have seen a lot of Paterson on the training ground in the last seven days, I am sure if he is signing him it's based on what he can see on the training ground and where he think's Paterson might play a part.
Okay, so haven't got a pot to piss in potentially, but Lampard is going to waste that money on a player who has barely played in America because he's cheap? Doesn't seem to make sense, Lampard has constantly said he wants to add and improve the group, which is why I believe (and I could be wrong) that FL thinks Paterson will add something.Or we haven't got a pot to piss in and he's the cheapest available option?
Paterson has not been an 8 his entire career. I doubt we plan to convert him now.The plan is for him to be more box to box
He's 33 , he's got years ahead of him to change his playing stylePaterson has not been an 8 his entire career. I doubt we plan to convert him now.
His finishing was pretty decent from what I remember.
Not one in, one out then.Been told the same
Rak Sakyi could also be announced today
To be fair top @Saddlebrains i don’t think Paterson will be breaking the bank and therefore it doesn’t really apply to deals of this size.Not one in, one out then.
What an utterly dreadful signing .
Be honest if it was anyone of our rivals signing him we would be pissing ourselves .
There is a plan! So this is actually real then....The plan is for him to be more box to box
Kai Andrews has been loaned outNot one in, one out then.
He's not a striker, he's a LW who can also play in the number 10 role.
He’s not a striker? Plays as a ten
Yea you are missing something because hes not a striker
Isn't he pretty much an AM / LW rather than a striker?
Not sure about "spending most of his career in the championship" being a negative, when people have been saying we are crying out for experience.
He may turn out dog shit, he may be half decent playing in an AM role. Who knows.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?