yeah not sure on thatBased Doug said fuck that one off Frank, hold tight and we'll get you a serious player in January.
On the other hand, Sheffield United look a complete mess.
Wilder actually said in his interview regarding the signing of Bamford that it looks like they (Coventry) want to go for it in January. Or something along those lines.yeah not sure on that
Im sure if Lampard was adamant that Bamford was a neccessity for promotion then Doug wouldve allowed it. My guess is his wages were too high and Lampard wasnt that arsed about itHopefully doug lets frank and the staff (austin) recruit what they think we need and not what doug thinks we need
In january too that is
Who’s the shop?It's a sign of how badly expressed the metaphor was that Bamford is in fact the kid, Dougie and Frank are the parents, CCFC is the Solero and Sheff Utd are the choc ice
Yeah, managers aren't going to turn down an extra player but as you say no one seems to have fought too hard to make it happen.Im sure if Lampard was adamant that Bamford was a neccessity for promotion then Doug wouldve allowed it. My guess is his wages were too high and Lampard wasnt that arsed about it
"But Pat feels he's still got a point to prove. I've talked to him, we've seen him train, talked to Frank, spoke to their medical staff. And it was pretty touch and go whether they took him. I think there was an argument that they might be having a bit of a go at it in January - and quite rightly so - and Pat thought that maybe he wouldn't get the minutes that he wanted."Wilder actually said in his interview regarding the signing of Bamford that it looks like they (Coventry) want to go for it in January. Or something along those lines.
The transfer marketWho’s the shop?
I mean what does he know?Wilder actually said in his interview regarding the signing of Bamford that it looks like they (Coventry) want to go for it in January. Or something along those lines.
Play with a traditional centre forward, presumably.What's a number 9 club?
Sounds about right."But Pat feels he's still got a point to prove. I've talked to him, we've seen him train, talked to Frank, spoke to their medical staff. And it was pretty touch and go whether they took him. I think there was an argument that they might be having a bit of a go at it in January - and quite rightly so - and Pat thought that maybe he wouldn't get the minutes that he wanted."
Would we have been better off signing Hudlin?Sounds about right.
Bamford would be useful in our squad between now and Christmas if Wright and Haji get crocked / suspended for stamping on someone’s head (see that Stalybridge thing? Crazy) so in that universe Bamford might be / have been useful to have around until the window opens. It sounds like Doug is hinting that the cheque book is possibly open in January if needed.
Would Bamford have taken a 6 week contract? That’s the touch and go bit it seems.
Good luck to the lad. Sheff United have players that are far better than their position shows.
Looks like the experts were 100% right then.https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/foo...roversy-coventry-city-transfer-u-turn-5412758
But he was only here to train and was never going to sign for us according to the experts on here.
are you calling Lampard not an expert?Looks like the experts were 100% right then.
if the right player(s) are available hed be crazy not to. Not saying go mad but we’re not going to get a better chance than this.It sounds like Doug is hinting that the cheque book is possibly open in January if needed.
Lampard was the one who said Bamford was here purely for training. And that's exactly what happened.are you calling Lampard not an expert?
Well Bamford and Wilder both said that Lampard wanted to sign himLampard was the one who said Bamford was here purely for training. And that's exactly what happened.
There was zero indication from this end that he was being seriously considered as a signing.
We may have said something along those lines to Sheffield utd to help him get a contract, but quite obviously Doug was under no illusion (unlike you it would appear)
Or maybe your saying Lampard is a bullshitter?
Well maybe they are full of shit?Well Bamford and Wilder both said that Lampard wanted to sign him
yes i’m sure they were lyingWell maybe they are full of shit?
Look at it this way, Lampard said he was here purely for training.
The "experts" on here said he was here purely for training.
And it turns out he was here purely for training!
I think we can safely draw a line under this one now.
So tell us brain of fucking Britain, was it Lampard or Wilder who was lying?yes i’m sure they were lying
christ you’re thick
yes quite clearly he would not back him because he didn’t want to sign him as Bamfkrd himself saidSo tell us brain of fucking Britain, was it Lampard or Wilder who was lying?
Do you honestly think for one minute that if Frank wanted to sign Bamford that Doug would not of backed him?
Jesus wept, how fucking dense are you?
Are you after any magic beans by any chance?yes quite clearly he would not back him because he didn’t want to sign him as Bamfkrd himself said
they are bored on a Friday night, don't bite.Are you after any magic beans by any chance?
I can only imagine that the club called any deal off based on wages for a player who ultimately would have been third in the pecking order behind Wright and Simms.
Sounds like Doug pulled the plug on it after pretty much being a signed deal!
hahahahahahathey are bored on a Friday night, don't bite.
You used to be so much better at this.hahahahahaha
Oooooo scary David what a threatYou used to be so much better at this.
Oh well, you're not long for this forum.
That's what I would hope will happen. Bamford has no long term future or resale value. Assume he wanted big wages.Based Doug said fuck that one off Frank, hold tight and we'll get you a serious player in January.
On the other hand, Sheffield United look a complete mess.
He literally has no incentive to lie. It seems likely we would have signed him if Doug didn’t block Lampard wanting toBamford seems like a decent lad , lampard said he was just training early on , never said anything after that and anything could have happened
I dont know why bamford would just lie
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?