Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Transfer Rumour Outgoings? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Jan 10, 2023
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
First Prev 9 of 9

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 13, 2023
  • #281
AFCCOVENTRY said:
Clearly Waghorn hasn’t been let go without Robins having a replacement in attack coming in early next week imo.
Click to expand...

If he hasn't, can we blame Boddy? If he's taking a salary and all that...
 
Reactions: Deleted member 9744
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 13, 2023
  • #282
fernandopartridge said:
What's good business about it? The fact the club's finances appear so perilous that we weaken our already wafer thin squad ahead of a match against the league leaders. It's embarrassing really, we can't be that desperate surely that we couldn't hold them off until a replacement is agreed?
Click to expand...
Ridiculous. Took the chance to get rid of two high earner who never play

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: covcity4life and mmttww
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 13, 2023
  • #283
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
Kane and Waghorn are two players contributing almost nothing other than a respectable chunk out of the wage bill and a seat on the bench. We wanted them gone in the summer (allegedly) and couldn't find any takers. If the wage bill needs cutting in order to bring players in, and we have takers for those two, then for me it is a pretty open and closed case that you move them on whilst you have the chance.

Are we low on numbers tomorrow? Yes
Are we probably going to lose tomorrow anyway? Yes
Will they bring in replacements that surely can't be any worse? All being well yes

I get that last point is probably where it lies, but I can't see why we're getting upset about losing Waghorn and Kane.
Click to expand...
Yep this is exactly it. We probably lose tomorrow anyway and if we do it isn't because kane and waghorn don't come off the bench. Get rid of them while we can

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, PUSB-We_are_going_up, covcity4life and 2 others

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #284
It is baffling the posters who are against moving on waghorn and kane. Baffling
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains, aloisijohnnyaloisi, DannyThomas_1981 and 1 other person

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #285
larry_david said:
It is baffling the posters who are against moving on waghorn and kane. Baffling
Click to expand...
They’re not they just want to pour cold water on any positivity
 
Reactions: DannyThomas_1981 and rexo87

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #286
larry_david said:
It is baffling the posters who are against moving on waghorn and kane. Baffling
Click to expand...
Not against it in principle but do think it pretty ridiculous to do it in Waghorn's case where there is literally not another fit senior forward at the club.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #287
mmttww said:
means we get a look at Bapaga, I'll take that. He picked a good time to bag a hat trick in the U21s!
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: Skybluedownunder, shmmeee, PVA and 2 others
R

rexo87

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #288
fernandopartridge said:
Not against it in principle but do think it pretty ridiculous to do it in Waghorn's case where there is literally not another fit senior forward at the club.
Click to expand...
Again, the option to do it may not have been there if we had waited until after Burnley. So it's a case of having to go 1 game with 1 striker, not the end of the world

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #289
fernandopartridge said:
Not against it in principle but do think it pretty ridiculous to do it in Waghorn's case where there is literally not another fit senior forward at the club.
Click to expand...
There was barely one before yesterday tbf
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #290
rexo87 said:
Again, the option to do it may not have been there if we had waited until after Burnley. So it's a case of having to go 1 game with 1 striker, not the end of the world

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Again the option is always there, who else are Huddersfield looking at?
 
Reactions: stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #291
larry_david said:
It is baffling the posters who are against moving on waghorn and kane. Baffling
Click to expand...
No one is against it. It's more the timing of the Waghorn departure as we're very likely to have Harrison Nee and Will Bapaga on the bench today.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 14, 2023
  • #292
stupot07 said:
No one is against it. It's more the timing of the Waghorn departure as we're very likely to have Harrison Nee and Will Bapaga on the bench today.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I don't think Robins would have done it without having a replacement close to joining.

Whether that's Paterson or AN Other, with Godden & Walker to return in the next few weeks.
 
Reactions: PUSB-We_are_going_up
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
First Prev 9 of 9
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?