But Walker is more suited to the loan striker role than Godden.Godden is definitely more suited to the lone striker role than Walker.
I quite like Walker but don't think he can play as a lone striker. He's not good at holding onto the ball. He is a good finisher though and is an immeasurably better option alongside Gyokeres than Waghorn.
I don't think the calling out of a player last week automatically means that player is the one who is leaving. The one who is leaving is whoever has elicited interest from another club.
The window doesn't close todayI’m hoping another signing is announced today, as two kids on either flank aren’t going to necessarily invigorate and shore up a limping squad.
Never thought Walker was any good and still don't.But Walker is more suited to the loan striker role than Godden.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
We sure wereBefore the O'Hare and Fadz injury, we we're 2 decent wing backs away from being one of the best sides in the division.
Waghorn on his way maybe??
Not in squad and looking likely to move on in the next few days.
I’m aware of that. However, I was hoping we’d have signed a CB as we have Burnley?The window doesn't close today
I’m aware of that. However, I was hoping we’d have signed a CB as we have Burnley?
Robins said he couldn't get his targets yet. Should he hurry just to please You?
Think he will end up with Bidwell plus the loanees and have a reset in the summer and barring any more injuries at CB including rose we will get through midtable which will be classed ok by king.
I’m aware of that. However, I was hoping we’d have signed a CB as we have Burnley?
What's good business about it? The fact the club's finances appear so perilous that we weaken our already wafer thin squad ahead of a match against the league leaders. It's embarrassing really, we can't be that desperate surely that we couldn't hold them off until a replacement is agreed?Waghorn and Kane gone, that really is fantastic business.
Well done to the club so far.
Waghorn and Kane gone, that really is fantastic business.
Well done to the club so far.
Serious??Ridiculous
Did I say the season hinged on Burnley away?How would a signing today help v Burnley? A player has to be registered with the FA by 12 noon the day before a match to play.
Also players have stuff to sort out and no chance of training with squad. No way would they play even if registered.
Our whole season doesnt hinge on away at Burnley. It is one we would expect to lose anyway. It’s more important we get the right deals rather than just get a body in.
Serious?What's good business about it? The fact the club's finances appear so perilous that we weaken our already wafer thin squad ahead of a match against the league leaders. It's embarrassing really, we can't be that desperate surely that we couldn't hold them off until a replacement is agreed?
I wonder if they’ve been trying? Nah you’re probably right you and grendel it’s all about reducing wages rather than improving the squad ffsDid I say the season hinged on Burnley away?
However by your logic, a defeat is permissible; wouldn’t you rather us turn up and get a result with a more solid back line?
A CB should have been wrapped up this week, it’s a priority.
Sorry, what?I wonder if they’ve been trying? Nah you’re probably right you and grendel it’s all about reducing wages rather than improving the squad ffs
You speak as if you just knock on the door of your rivals and take the prize player. Grendel convinced we are trying to reduce wages and had to in order to raise money for any loans, he might be right but could we wait and seeSorry, what?
What's good business about it? The fact the club's finances appear so perilous that we weaken our already wafer thin squad ahead of a match against the league leaders. It's embarrassing really, we can't be that desperate surely that we couldn't hold them off until a replacement is agreed?
Ridiculous
Am I? That’s a grand assumption from somebody who doesn’t know me.You speak as if you just knock on the door of your rivals and take the prize player. Grendel convinced we are trying to reduce wages and had to in order to raise money for any loans, he might be right but could we wait and see
SorryAm I? That’s a grand assumption from somebody who doesn’t know me.
A centre back is a priority, it has been since Fadz was injured, and there’s still no signing; where did I say Grendel has said this or that so that you think I agree with him?
Seriously, wind it in, mate. I come here to chat and to have a banter, not have someone jump on me for shit I haven’t said.
We are not weakening the squad to any genuine extent by getting rid of Kane and Waghorn.What's good business about it? The fact the club's finances appear so perilous that we weaken our already wafer thin squad ahead of a match against the league leaders. It's embarrassing really, we can't be that desperate surely that we couldn't hold them off until a replacement is agreed?
Yes serious and hope to god Vik doesn't go down injured after 3 minutes like O'Hare did at SheffieldSerious?
Can they play up front?We are not weakening the squad to any genuine extent by getting rid of Kane and Waghorn.
I am confident the two loans we have made will contribute far more.
Who is on your bench for tomorrow?We are not weakening the squad to any genuine extent by getting rid of Kane and Waghorn.
I am confident the two loans we have made will contribute far more.
Basically said the same on the Waghorn thread. I'd rather us bring someone before letting him go. We have just 2 recognised 'attacking' players in Vik and Palmer. We're then into Harrison NeeYes serious and hope to god Vik doesn't go down injured after 3 minutes like O'Hare did at Sheffield
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?