Should be the busiest thread on the site being as every other thread goes back to how good our strikers are or are notAre they good enough or not? Debate it here instead of the Calum Doyle thread and every other thread.
Sims? BTA? Bassette? Wright ?
Or is it our style of play?Not good enough, there its been said, if we fall short at the end of the season like we did last season, for the want of a decent striker, its down to Frank and Doug for not addressing the one glaring weakness in the squad.
I've often thought we'd be better with 2 out and out strikers, but again, formation and tactics are down to the manager.Or is it our style of play?
NOAre they good enough or not? Debate it here instead of the Calum Doyle thread and every other thread.
Sims? BTA? Bassette? Wright ?
Needs a pollAre they good enough or not? Debate it here instead of the Calum Doyle thread and every other thread.
Sims? BTA? Bassette? Wright ?
No this one is about doctors striking, Nurses they come in autumn when the voting startsThought this would be about nurses rejecting a pay offer
Is that a no? Firm no?
So do we play to our strengths? Are the tactics wrong for what strikers we have ? Rarely do we play through the middle !I've often thought we'd be better with 2 out and out strikers, but again, formation and tactics are down to the manager.
I was going to vote swan vesta...foiled againThought this would be about nurses rejecting a pay offer
Simms just doesn't attack crosses that well or make those runs.Entirely happy to be corrected, but weren't we one of the leading teams in the division for getting crosses into the box?
If so, you think it would be the perfect set up for Simms, but it's just not working for him at the moment.
If this is our style, would we maybe be better with a big lump of a forward who stays in the penalty area and sticks his nut in where it hurts! I'm thinking of a cheap Chris Wood type. There must be a few kicking around in the lower divisions we could pick up relatively cheaply. Just a thought...
It's been said before on this forum by someone- Simms has this weird habit of jumping under the ball. He did several times last night.Simms just doesn't attack crosses that well or make those runs.
With the wingers it does look like it's our game plan to get crosses in.
Someone who threatens the opposition goal not threaten our goal by rebounding and dropping us in the shitSo who do we need then a Dion or a Huckerby ?
For the current and obvious style of getting the ball wide and then crosses into the box - a "Dion" all day long....So who do we need then a Dion or a Huckerby ?
I don't think it helps, both Sakamoto and EMC seem to want to beat the defender 3 or 4 times and then play the ball backwardsOr is it our style of play?
AddedNeeds a poll
Personally, I think the one glaring weakness was the goalkeeper (with Dovin injured) which has been addressed. Wright has proven himself to be one of the most clinical strikers in the division over two seasons although not sure how serious his injury is and opinion is also skewed by his play-off performances. The others don't look great and we definitely need to strengthen but GK was the No1 priority for me.Not good enough, there its been said, if we fall short at the end of the season like we did last season, for the want of a decent striker, its down to Frank and Doug for not addressing the one glaring weakness in the squad.
Im pleased with the recruitment so far, we obviously needed a GK, and by the looks of it we've got a good one. KKH is the cover we needed for MvE but obviously I can see him leaving before the window closes, dont know a lot about Brau but hopefully he will give us another option.Personally, I think the one glaring weakness was the goalkeeper (with Dovin injured) which has been addressed. Wright has proven himself to be one of the most clinical strikers in the division over two seasons although not sure how serious his injury is and opinion is also skewed by his play-off performances. The others don't look great and we definitely need to strengthen but GK was the No1 priority for me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?