Filed at Companies House by CCFC Ltd today:
ftp://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/im...f6/cc/8e/98/blREX+0L0094-79539_7-08707398.pdf
What does it say ? I can't open the link
It's trying to say the company is only responsible for the non playing side of the business.
we are doomed !!!! we are doomed !!!
Could you point to where it says this in the document please.It's trying to say the company is only responsible for the non playing side of the business.
Have you read it? It says exactly the opposite.
This is presumably the administrator tidying up things that should have been done by the directors.
It's trying to say the company is only responsible for the non playing side of the business.
100% wrong, Grenders
Sadly I only read the first page of the sub clauses My phone is not downloading the rest.
Looks more like a golden bullet to me although it is signed by CCFC holdings and you will also see that in 2n,o, p and q it could be intrepreted to support the SISU stand point.Ooh. Look at '2i'. Golden Share, Golden Share; wherefore art thou Golden Share? I think there's a big clue here....
Has Joy forgotten to pay your bill again?
Sadly I only read the first page of the sub clauses My phone is not downloading the rest.
Looks more like a golden bullet to me
The memorandum & articles of any company are the general rules under wich the company operates BSB. It says what legal proceedures are and what the aims of the company are. It seems that in December 2011 they changed the memorandum & articles and strangely it has taken until now to file. There appear to have been a number of changes to those documents over the years predating SISU
The last change before SISU came in seems to list the principal activities of CCFC Ltd as (1)to acquire from its parent company "The Coventry City Football Club Ltd " as a going concern the business of its playing activities of that company and to carry on such business under the name of "Coventry City Football Club"...... then (2) managaging the club etc
Clearly when it became two companies (limited and Holdings) the trade (running a football club) was in CCFC Limited
First change under SISU was filed by Igwy may 2008. That listed the first activity as owning stadia etc then second running a football club
these new ones at first glance seem to be the same as the ones Igwy filed ..... but I havent gone through word for word.
It would seem to me an attempt to prove that the principle activity of the company was owning stadia as far back as december 2011. Doesnt really matter though because article 2 is listed as running a football club and all articles carry equal weight in law
In addition I checked the Company House register for the football League - it clearly lists Coventry City Football Club Limited as its member owning one share as of 23/06/12
In fairness those mobile phone contracts are an outrage. I think the best solution is to not pay anything for nine months, and then when challenged with court action threaten to set up your own mobile phone company. That'll teach 'em.
Wise words. And then, if your service provider capitulates and gives you a reduced line rental, then claim you deserve a share of their canteen takings to boot
Has Joy forgotten to pay your bill again?
She said she can't afford it. She has told me I can take Tim's. Unfortunately Tim seems to have gone to ground.
She said she can't afford it. She has told me I can take Tim's. Unfortunately Tim seems to have gone to ground.
I was worried we were talking 6 feet under the ground for a second.Is there a food festival on anywhere? Maybe he's simply distracted by pastry-products?
Let me guess, the phone contracts were with 'Limited' and the phones have been moved to 'Holdings'? And no-one knows who's responsible. I'd get onto Paul Appleton and get him to add it to his list...
Looks more like a golden bullet to me although it is signed by CCFC holdings and you will also see that in 2 n,o, p and q it could be interpreted to support the SISU stand point.
Is there a food festival on anywhere? Maybe he's simply distracted by pastry-products?
Let me guess, the phone contracts were with 'Limited' and the phones have been moved to 'Holdings'? And no-one knows who's responsible. I'd get onto Paul Appleton and get him to add it to his list...
If said pastries came fresh from the 3M Bakery (a non operating subsidiary of 3M Delectables Ltd), I'd say it's a certainty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?