1) You suggested in March that it was a priority to purchase at least a 50% share in the stadium and couldn't understand how it had not already happened.
2) You anticipated promotion to the Premier League within 2 and hopefully 1 season.
3) You wanted to ensure that communication to the fans was improved. As part of this plan, Uncle Len was going to be giving regular updates via Tw*tter. (In fact I heard a rumour that he is soon set for a Q&A session with an on-line fans forum Sky Blues Talk).
How do you think that you are performing against these targets so far?
We should also remember that when he and Brody joined the Board last December we were 4th in the League. We were full of optimism. All downhill from there.
Wrong. Was attending boards from December or even November according to what they have both said themselves. How else could they have voted for Thomas to leave in January if what you say is true????
the 2010 accounts for CCFC show he was appointed 01/02/11. He was appointed director CCFC Holdings 22/11/10 and of SBS & L 20/12/10. That doesnt make the decision process so clear cut ...... why didnt he get appointed to all 3 on one date ?
SISU is a Finnish term loosely translated into English as strength of will, determination, perseverance, and acting rationally in the face of adversity. So even plastic Ken is working for a company who are full of sh1t.
Exactly. I think you will find no decisions made at CCFC level. Only at Holdings and SB S and L. More smoke and mirrors??
If you look closely Joe Elliot never on Holdings or SBS and L as director. Hoff never on SB S and L
So SISU always pulling the strings? Maybe puts a different slant on previous analysis??
Exactly. I think you will find no decisions made at CCFC level. Only at Holdings and SB S and L. More smoke and mirrors??
If you look closely Joe Elliot never on Holdings or SBS and L as director. Hoff never on SB S and L
So SISU always pulling the strings? Maybe puts a different slant on previous analysis??
not at all - i have always thought the ones pulling the strings were SISU with a bit of help from RR in the beginning. You dont spend out millions and lose control of it - just not logical to think they wouldnt be
I see what you mean. Just a shame for whoever their investors are. I wonder if the investors would know about everything the fund invests in? Would there have to be a report?
I would have thought so...... SISU are only managers and have a duty to their clients to keep their investment reviewed. I would have thought an investor could get an investment report any time they like but it wont be detailed in terms of say decisions taken ar CCFC, more a summary of worth (not much) and risk