The way I see it Tankie, is that we're £1.3m in debt. The £60m (which is £45m in some outlets...maybe a but of sensationalism in some parts?) is reportedly what has been put in over the past 5 years. Player sales/ticket sales/merchandise isn't enough to keep a club running without additional investment. Whether this is classified as debt or investment by owners is up to interpretation.
Previous statements that have said we're debt free would insinuate that SISU had written the money invested, off. I could be totally wrong but I suspect that the reporting by the local media of this as debt rather than investment is intended to create more animosity towards CCFC/SISU.
It's not as if we hear headlines such as 'CCFC owe HMRC £30m' or 'CCFC still to pay 2 years worth of transfer fees'. The only 'we owe' statement that's in the public domain is the £1.3 to ACL. That is what our debt actually stands at, as I said, unless SISU will want to recoup their previous inputs.
WM
WM
The problem is that nobody out here really knows so everything we pontificate on is mere supposition based on half-truths, innuendo and the 'reading between the lines' of various statements.
What we do know is that sooner or later the accounts will have to be published and then the truth will be out. Better to wait until then rather than drive ourselves potty trying to make sense of a nonsensical situation. In the meantime lets concentrate on the football and look for six points over the holiday. (See...I live in cloud cuckoo land as well.)
Has anyone considered that this figure includes the debts SISU acquired in 2007?
They repackaged the debt, paid none of it off, and here we have the result, plus added debt from 2007-2013.
Thanks SISU. :jerkit:
It may not have been a lie, but a part of a plan they have not yet executed.
To me that plan could be:
Reduce the rent cost, obtain Higgs shares at ACL, convert debts to equity, release shares to fans, restart from scratch.
As long as they haven't been able to agree rent terms with ACL that plan would be on hold.
So, there may be a plausible explanation to why it was said.
it has already been stated that ccfc LTD has the golden share by the FL and the administrator hasnt it ?
Maybe but not nescasarily 30million cash, some sort of deal giving sisu a stake as an investor could happen with payments linked to where we are and what we achieve, i think this could be what sisu are after and gives them a return although long term on their investmentI think this will end with SISU still in charge and CCFC through a string of parent companies still owing £60 million to ARVO.
Any company set up in the Cayman isles can be considered as for nepharious reasons.
Any buyer would need to pay at least £30 million to satisfy this debt
it has already been stated that ccfc LTD has the golden share by the FL and the administrator hasnt it ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?