Grendel
Well-Known Member
Would you describe the board at Norwich as rubbish?
and statistically relegation was inevitable, nothing to do with rubbish inept owners
Just for you and Delboy. Both have said it was an option. Neither have done it. Yet.
Remove the CCFC option and put just SISU instead and you know you'd get a very different looking result! As all politics students know, "the answer you get depends on the question you ask". And as all good fans of Not The Nine O'Clock News know, "The only good poll is a Deed Pole"
I don't see it that way. It's CCFC because that is the entity which ACL are taking to a hearing and not SISU. Not withstanding the fact SISU hold the purse strings.
can't believe you were behind that Torchy as these are far worse than him!
NLHWC....
I said exactly the same earlier in the thread before that idiot Torchy tried to put words in my mouth.
Remove the CCFC option and put just SISU instead and you know you'd get a very different looking result! As all politics students know, "the answer you get depends on the question you ask". And as all good fans of Not The Nine O'Clock News know, "The only good poll is a Deed Pole"
I know you are as passionate as any CCFC fan including me...it really does come across loud and clear in so much of what you say and I really do respect your right to have a view although I certainly don't agree with a lot of those views. I do think your consistent backing of owners who have held a gun to our heads and said if ACL don't play ball they will put us out of existence does you no favours at all and if they actually carry out their threat I wonder whether you will have the grace to apologise to every single CCFC fan you ever meet for being so wrong.
Well, everyone on here has tried to spin the results their way. Look at FF and the post he removed, but not until after I'd quoted it.[/QUO
You copied it, you should be able to find it if you want to score points.
You didn't take any note of the original reply did you? The % game was started by Grendel.
You even agreed with some of the points I made in my reply!
Well, everyone on here has tried to spin the results their way. Look at FF and the post he removed, but not until after I'd quoted it.[/QUO
You copied it, you should be able to find it if you want to score points.
You didn't take any note of the original reply did you? The % game was started by Grendel.
You even agreed with some of the points I made in my reply!
ACL because they don't want to see CCFC liquidated, whereas SISU do, if they don't get 100% their own way!:jerkit:
Torchy......
I said, ACL didn't want liquidation but Administration(Never once threatened Liquidation)
SISU however have threatened Liquidation.....how does the 18 years old "Dickhead" say it?...........End of!!!
Torchy......
I said, ACL didn't want liquidation but Administration(Never once threatened Liquidation)
SISU however have threatened Liquidation.....how does the 18 years old "Dickhead" say it?...........End of!!!
They have started the process of Administration....Actually !!!:facepalm:
You're younger than I thought.
They have started the process of Administration....Actually !!!:facepalm:
And You're a bigger prat than I originally thought too!
PWKH on here said they have started the process to put CCFC into compulsory liquidation. There's no argument here, they are his words, not mine!
As Torch said, admin is the first stage which COULD escalate to liquidation, therefore, the process of liquidation has begun, and was initiated by ACL. Again, there's no argument here, it is fact, not opinion!
Administration can lead to liquidation, but unlikely in our case.
We all know that, but it's still a possibility nonetheless, one we must weary of, and shouldn't be cheering ACL for putting us on a path which could potentially kill the club.
PWKH on here said they have started the process to put CCFC into compulsory liquidation. There's no argument here, they are his words, not mine!
As Torch said, admin is the first stage which COULD escalate to liquidation, therefore, the process of liquidation has begun, and was initiated by ACL. Again, there's no argument here, it is fact, not opinion!
That is not what I said. The fact is that ACL have started a process that could lead to Administration. Should no buyer be found, or should the secured creditors resist every attempt of an Administrator then it would probably lead to liquidation. That is usually unlikely. I agree with Torch and others that in this case where the secured creditor is Sisu that it is much more likely. But please read back when you think that you are quoting me to see that you actually are...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?