Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
By 2 votes, which could change in favour of CCFC.
And yet less side with SISU even when the "ballot paper" lumps them in with CCFC.
Yes, looked like you missed something:
The Board of ACL has already issued a Statutory Demand for payment, the deadline for which has long since passed, and is now looking at its legal options. These legal options include petitioning the courts to grant an order to wind up CCFC and starting off the process of placing the Club into compulsory liquidation.
Read More http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...gs-charity-view-92746-32606542/#ixzz2NvmzgyHB
I simply do not want administration.
I sincerely hope something happens this week that will keep us going and avoid any penalty and that it can all be sorted out in the Summer.
For me, the rent is far too high. The club should own the ground. The club should receive the income from food and beverages on match days.
Do think though that the rent arrears should be paid and that it should never have got to this state of affairs.
It was clear to myself and others that the Christmas before last we were certainties for relegation. At that point the alarm bells should have rang loud and clear.
I'm only on the side of CCFC on this. It's just been one big sorry mess.
You obviously read this differently to me Torchy.
The first highlighted piece says to me, ACL are looking at "Legal options"(Plural)
This meaning one of possibly numerous options. It does not state they are going to force liquidation. It states LOOKING. Big difference mate!
The Poll is set up wrong. It should be set up like this:-
ACL/CCFC
SISU/CCFC
CCFC
Simple as that.
If you are looking for a retraction I wouldn't bother. It appears he is never wrong.@ Torchy...
The Board of ACL has already issued a Statutory Demand for payment, the deadline for which has long since passed, and is now looking at its legal options. These legal options include petitioning the courts to grant an order to wind up CCFC and starting off the process of placing the Club into compulsory liquidation.
Read More http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...gs-charity-view-92746-32606542/#ixzz2Nze7qEmV
Taken from your own link.
It states...The Board of ACL has already issued a Statutory Demand for payment, the deadline for which has long since passed, and is now looking at its legal options. These legal options include petitioning the courts to grant an order to wind up CCFC and starting off the process of placing the Club into compulsory liquidation.
It says....It's Legal Options "Include" It does NOT say it is "Threatening Liquidation. ACL have stated on numerous occasions They want "Administration, that would be better in the long run for CCFC"
This is a bit of a biased poll as I would vote CCFC, but if your calling it CCFC (SISU) they are 2 completely different things. No vote for that reason.
@ Torchy...
The Board of ACL has already issued a Statutory Demand for payment, the deadline for which has long since passed, and is now looking at its legal options. These legal options include petitioning the courts to grant an order to wind up CCFC and starting off the process of placing the Club into compulsory liquidation.
Read More http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/ne...gs-charity-view-92746-32606542/#ixzz2Nze7qEmV
Taken from your own link.
It states...The Board of ACL has already issued a Statutory Demand for payment, the deadline for which has long since passed, and is now looking at its legal options. These legal options include petitioning the courts to grant an order to wind up CCFC and starting off the process of placing the Club into compulsory liquidation.
It says....It's Legal Options "Include" It does NOT say it is "Threatening Liquidation. ACL have stated on numerous occasions They want "Administration, that would be better in the long run for CCFC"
correct me when I'm wrong but when did ACL say they'd liquidate the club? Didn't Fisher say that liquidation on SISU's part was inevitiabe? Like I say correct me if I'm wrong.
correct me when I'm wrong but when did ACL say they'd liquidate the club? Didn't Fisher say that liquidation on SISU's part was inevitiabe? Like I say correct me if I'm wrong.
You're not wrong Procdoc...you're 100% right, and so am I.
Torchy is a fish on the hook, trying desperately to get off it but can't. Lmfao!
Final time Torchy....YOU ARE WRONG :facepalm:
3 out of every 4 pollsters do not back SISU. Easy to play around with stats. As at 15:40.
100% agreement on that.Very true. As at 15:42 only 26.92% back ACL. See, I can do it too.
Torchy says...."Put it this way then. ACLs options include liquidation and SISUs option include liquidation."
2 part answer Torchy....Correct...one of ACL's options(But never once was it threatened) was liquidation.(ACL always claimed Administration)
2nd part SISU actually threatened Liquidation.....Fisher said that liquidation on SISU's part was inevitiabe?...nothing else on SISU's part ever said anything other than this!:facepalm:
Keep squirming mate... You'll need a disgorger to get this hook out:laugh:
Fisher said due to the current situation then it would be difficult to avoid insolvency as the club was at a tipping point.
ACL said that one of their options to get the money back was liquidation.
Neither side have said "we are going to liquidate, ha ha ha", which was the point that is missed by SBK, MMM,CJ, Coundon and all the others that say "Well, we don't want administration but ACL have no choice because SISU are going to liquidate." He never said that, he said things needed to get sorted out before it got to that point.
Things aren't as black and white as the above posters, ACL and PWKH would have you believe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?