Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Officiating (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Sep 13, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #211
Didn't think the ref was that bad
 
Reactions: Hobo

Sky Blue Goblin

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #212
Ref was decent I thought today outside of the handball. The linesman however
 

Mercian In Anglia

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #213
Skyblue Bangkok said:
Definitely the one against Millwall, today not sure.
Click to expand...
Agree the Millwall one was clearer, but thought the Wed lad leaned into the ball with his arm, rather than it just hitting him with his arm by his side.

I'm sure I'll get over it!
 

Ricketts

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #214
Definitely handball, ref seemed to have a good view.
As for the offside, I can only assume the lino thought it went straight in. I did at first.
 
Reactions: wingy

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #215
PLAY UP POMPEY POMPEY PLAY UP
 

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #216
I thought Bobby got it before Wright got there
 
Reactions: wingy

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #217
Sky Blue Goblin said:
Ref was decent I thought today outside of the handball. The linesman however
Click to expand...
He couldn’t flag Hadji’s goal because he only had one flag
 

Warwickhunt

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • #218
Two city players were blocking the linesman view of Wright and it looks like it went straight in.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 5, 2025
  • #219
Let’s face it VAR has made worse decisions than that linesman even after the benefit of countless replays.
 
S

Skyblue Bangkok

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 5, 2025
  • #220
Hobo said:
Let’s face it VAR has made worse decisions than that linesman even after the benefit of countless replays.
Click to expand...
Did you see the Celtic goal disallowed the other night?The ball clearly comes off the Celtic players face , yet VAR claims it hit his arm, worst VAR decision I've ever seen.
 
Reactions: shmmeee

Adge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 5, 2025
  • #221
Shannerz said:
The only possible explanation is that he thought it went straight in.
Click to expand...
This. A clear lack of team communication resulted in the goal being given. The referee needs to step in there as the linesman can be forgiven for seeing it go (so he thinks) straight in. The Referee who is nearer has to see that it has been put in by Wright.
 
Reactions: Shannerz
S

Skyblue Bangkok

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 5, 2025
  • #222
Adge said:
This. A clear lack of team communication resulted in the goal being given. The referee needs to step in there as the linesman can be forgiven for seeing it go (so he thinks) straight in. The Referee who is nearer has to see that it has been put in by Wright.
Click to expand...
They are human , mistakes happen , some of you on here seem to think no mistakes ever happen.
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 5, 2025
  • #223
Skyblue Bangkok said:
They are human , mistakes happen , some of you on here seem to think no mistakes ever happen.
Click to expand...
Not a criticism-just balancing it why it was possible the Assistant didn’t raise his flag.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Nick

Administrator
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #224
One goal offside, the other after a clear foul on tats.

Ref didn't want to give us a thing all second half.
 
Reactions: skybluepm2, blunted and DazzleTommyDazzle

lifeskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #225
I thought all the goals legitimate. Not convinced there was enough in the challenge on Tats before their third. I would have been annoyed if given against us
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSoul and Nuskyblue

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #226
The worst decision tonight was missing the yellow card for that foul on Tats. Hes turned two defenders and would have been well away into their half. One of many poor decisions.
 
Reactions: CovRes

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #227
lifeskyblue said:
I thought all the goals legitimate. Not convinced there was enough in the challenge on Tats before their third. I would have been annoyed if given against us
Click to expand...
he's fouled him twice, if he needs to be fouled more than that then it's rugby not football
 
Reactions: CovRes

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #228
pusbccfc said:
The worst decision tonight was missing the yellow card for that foul on Tats. Hes turned two defenders and would have been well away into their half. One of many poor decisions.
Click to expand...
Moore also hacks down a player on a yellow and ref doesn't even give a foul

And before any fun sponge says anything being shite and the ref being are not mutually exclusive things
 
Reactions: blunted, CovRes and pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #229
David O'Day said:
Moore also hacks down a player on a yellow and ref doesn't even give a foul

And before any fun sponge says anything being shite and the ref being are not mutually exclusive things
Click to expand...

Be careful, he'll come for you tomorrow morning.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • #230
pusbccfc said:
Be careful, he'll come for you tomorrow morning.
Click to expand...
Kiefer Moore?
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #231
David O'Day said:
Kiefer Moore?
Click to expand...

You wish. It will be Sparky.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #232
Ref was a c**t
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #233
pusbccfc said:
You wish. It will be Sparky.
Click to expand...
trembling

far to gleeful that we lost that one
 
Reactions: pusbccfc

hinckley cov

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #234
Cant blame the referee for our bloody amateur defending.
 
Reactions: skybluegod and lifeskyblue
S

skyblue_55

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #235
The linesman 2nd half couldn’t keep up with play …… he missed the offsides & didn’t flag for the play acting/diving ….he needn’t have bothered turning up !
 
Reactions: skybluepm2
D

Dougin

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #236
Ref was sound, offside goal too close to call with naked eye, one on Saka wasn’t a foul.

mason clarke should of gone down when sheaf pulled him back in centre circle would have been a definate 2nd yellow we would of gone on to win .
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #237
The ref seemed to enjoy his second half and got excited by the crowd, how the bloke on the right hand side didn’t get booked for diving I have no idea. Sheaf should have had a second yellow for the pull back on EMC you shouldn’t need to go over to get these decisions.
 

jim20

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #238
I’ve watched the replays of the Saka incident which led to their goal, and if that’s not a foul then we should start doing it! He’s practically ripping Sakas shirt off, after pushing him. He’s pulls him down, clear as day. If he wasn’t pulling his shirt Saka wouldn’t have gone down
 
Reactions: skybluepm2, thekidfromstrettoncamp and Sky Blue Pete

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #239
Nick said:
One goal offside, the other after a clear foul on tats.

Ref didn't want to give us a thing all second half.
Click to expand...

I don't think any of the goals were offside and it definitely wasn't a foul on Tats.
 
Reactions: Dougin

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #240
jim20 said:
I’ve watched the replays of the Saka incident which led to their goal, and if that’s not a foul then we should start doing it! He’s practically ripping Sakas shirt off, after pushing him. He’s pulls him down, clear as day. If he wasn’t pulling his shirt Saka wouldn’t have gone down
Click to expand...
It was a foul but he was quite consistent not allowing people to just go down and win a free kick
 
Reactions: jim20

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #241
Hobo said:
it definitely wasn't a foul on Tats.
Click to expand...

Really?

 
Reactions: chickentikkamasala and Sky Blue Pete

Nick

Administrator
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • #242
Nah no foul
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • #243
Tats had hold of the other players shorts and was already off balance before any contact. No foul. Take your sky blue glasses off.
 
Reactions: Johhny Blue and MusicDating

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • #244
jim20 said:
I’ve watched the replays of the Saka incident which led to their goal, and if that’s not a foul then we should start doing it! He’s practically ripping Sakas shirt off, after pushing him. He’s pulls him down, clear as day. If he wasn’t pulling his shirt Saka wouldn’t have gone down
Click to expand...
Promise us you won’t ever become a ref.
 
Reactions: Hobo

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • #245
Hobo said:
Tats had hold of the other players shorts and was already off balance before any contact. No foul. Take your sky blue glasses off.
Click to expand...

Did you not see the video? The guy had Sakamoto by the neck the entire time!
 
Reactions: thekidfromstrettoncamp, chickentikkamasala, jim20 and 1 other person
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?