skybluecam
Well-Known Member
Because if the keeper is injured and play continues it’s incredibly easy for the other team to score? What are you on about
Because if the keeper is injured and play continues it’s incredibly easy for the other team to score? What are you on aboutWhy? If it's not a head injury then the game isn't stopped for outfield players when the ball is in play.
He can see by the amount they do when comparing the two teams, it's time they realised it's a tactic of team's when they're away from home.What can he do about the time wasting realistically?
When they fake injuries he has no options. He was actually pretty hot on stuff otherwise.
There are plenty of injuries that require temporary treatment and then see the players get up and carry on with the game, it happens every week?There are no genuine injuries like this. If the keeper is injured and needs to come off then they can be subbed that’s what that’s there for. Otherwise fuck it let’s stop the game for nine months while an ACL heals. The idea physios are treating serious injuries and players are playing on is complete nonsense.
It's a tactic and it needs a sin bin or something like for me.There are plenty of injuries that require temporary treatment and then see the players get up and carry on with the game, it happens every week?
I’m not expecting you to agree with it, certainly not after we’ve just watched a time wasting masterclass, but keepers are always going to get special treatment (rightly so) and player welfare is always going to take precedence over time-wasting concerns. Encouraging players to play through injuries so they don’t have to come off isn’t brave or admirable anymore, it’s just stupid.
Because if the keeper is injured and play continues it’s incredibly easy for the other team to score? What are you on about
And?Because if the keeper is injured and play continues it’s incredibly easy for the other team to score? What are you on about
Haven't seen a replay yet and was down the other end.Agree with Lampard we should have had a pen too
There are plenty of injuries that require temporary treatment and then see the players get up and carry on with the game, it happens every week?
I’m not expecting you to agree with it, certainly not after we’ve just watched a time wasting masterclass, but keepers are always going to get special treatment (rightly so) and player welfare is always going to take precedence over time-wasting concerns. Encouraging players to play through injuries so they don’t have to come off isn’t brave or admirable anymore, it’s just stupid.
Lampard having digs
Haven't seen a replay yet and was down the other end.
He gave them a free kick for some reason which was strange?
And if they fuck up, and a team loses a game because the ref has ignored the injury, they will get busted for it.And?
And if they fuck up, and a team loses a game because the ref has ignored the injury, they will get busted for it.
We're going round in circles here, but the referee will not risk something like that. They have a career to manage, too.
Of course they do, which is bad. That’s why the rules shouldn’t incentivise them to do it more.There’s nothing in the rules about stopping the game for every minor injury. Players are supposed to leave the pitch at the next break of play. This idea what every time a player sits down the game has to stop is completely made up.
By your logic we shouldn’t have competitive football because players push themselves through injury all the time.
So take an outfield player off every time.Of course they do, which is bad. That’s why the rules shouldn’t incentivise them to do it more.
As I said earlier, keepers are always going to get special/different treatment because of the unique role they play.
What about if a team loses a game because refs miss everything?
Let's face it, refs can do what they did today and fuck all happens.
He enabled the time wasting because he watched them do it, then went over, then they just waste time after again.
He was. Took his leg.Looked to me like he was clipped from behind live
Of course they do, which is bad. That’s why the rules shouldn’t incentivise them to do it more.
As I said earlier, keepers are always going to get special/different treatment because of the unique role they play.
Yep. The lino on the side of the benches was constantly behind the game.The only thing I'll say in his defence is there were a couple of incidents that the linesmen were close to and they gave him no help at all, a trio of useless cunts
I guess? Or just make refs do their job in terms of stoppage time. I miss that World Cup 10+ minutes energy. Although it would mean I’d miss my train most weeks.So take an outfield player off every time.
Job done.
Even aside from time wasting, he was fucking terrible.
Free kick themHe was. Took his leg.
I guess? Or just make refs do their job in terms of stoppage time. I miss that World Cup 10+ minutes energy. Although it would mean I’d miss my train most weeks.
Not seen it but with var they are still making mistakes.Even with VAR, the referees in this country are useless. Anyone seen the disallowed goal in the Spurs game? Ridiculous.
It’s completely pointless and all decent football fans should demand it be scrapped.Not seen it but with var they are still making mistakes.
How can they watch multiple replays and still get it wrong? Then have to come out and apologise.
I thought that came off a defender but it's hard to see with the sun in your eyes.Yep. The lino on the side of the benches was constantly behind the game.
Haven't seen the disallowed goal back to see how offside it was but he missed about 3 offsides for them.
Ref booked 3 of them for time wasting and added 10 mins on. Can't really do more than that
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?