WONDERLAMPS Well-Known Member Jul 2, 2014 #3 Mark Marshall was a poor player. He had pace but nothing else. Hence why he went to vale and didn't stay here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mark Marshall was a poor player. He had pace but nothing else. Hence why he went to vale and didn't stay here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
skybluetony176 Well-Known Member Jul 2, 2014 #4 FRY-CCFC said: Mark Marshall was a poor player. He had pace but nothing else. Hence why he went to vale and didn't stay here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Click to expand... Given the obvious attractions of our club created by sisu do you think anyone we are likely to sign as a replacement will be A) worse or B) better? I'm going for option A.
FRY-CCFC said: Mark Marshall was a poor player. He had pace but nothing else. Hence why he went to vale and didn't stay here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Click to expand... Given the obvious attractions of our club created by sisu do you think anyone we are likely to sign as a replacement will be A) worse or B) better? I'm going for option A.
WONDERLAMPS Well-Known Member Jul 2, 2014 #5 skybluetony176 said: Given the obvious attractions of our club created by sisu do you think anyone we are likely to sign as a replacement will be A) worse or B) better? I'm going for option A. Click to expand... We're signing Swanson who is better than Marshall as he can control a football. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
skybluetony176 said: Given the obvious attractions of our club created by sisu do you think anyone we are likely to sign as a replacement will be A) worse or B) better? I'm going for option A. Click to expand... We're signing Swanson who is better than Marshall as he can control a football. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
L lagger New Member Jul 2, 2014 #6 fernandopartridge said: Marshall? Did you even see him play? Click to expand... Yep