Well maybe I am not a real fan then Torch?
However, I am not at Sixfields I am on a public path that happens to be on a hill above the stadium .
This is silly.
......The commentator must have forgotten to turn his mic on
Torch you seem to talk gibberish pretty much the whole time these days. Bitter, twisted gibberish.
Some fellow fans go on the hill, not giving money to Sisu, they have some banners, do some chanting, get a fair amount of publicity-- because you know what the action in itself is a protest; so what they see some of the game- they are Cov fans.
We know you dont like Jimmys Hill, we know you dont like anyone opposing Sisu, we know you dont like ACL, we know you dont like CCC. We get it. Just go to Sixfields, pay them your money and be happy FFS.
Yes it is silly. That is my point. We've gone from boycotting, not going to Northampton, etc etc to going anyway and watching the games for nothing. The Trust say one thing publicly then do the total opposite to suit themselves. I'm done with them.
After 40 years it's bloody difficult just to switch off and not attend games, but I've done it. I feel even more for my 7-year-old who is City mad and only just starting out on the CCFC journey. I feel we're making a stand in our own small way together with the other 9000 odd fans who have decided to do the same, yet still I get labelled a SISU Lover, etc etc by people on here who DO see them for nowt.
Seeing people (and having Trust members crowing about it) going on the hill anyway, shouting KCiC, etc yet makes me think "why bother?" Why not just go and see the team I support? As for the Trust. Fuck 'em.
No it's NOT protest. Michael admitted to as much the other day.
Don't like seeing anyone opposing SISU? Nothing could be further from the truth. I'm just not a brainwashed "SISU out" automoton like you and many others. There is more than one side in this.
10,000 cov fans have been Brainwashed haha-- was in something Cov Council put in the water?. Youre losing it fella...
What you never get is Sisu own the club and are responsible for its well being. The buck stops with them.
...I dont think its news to anyone on here that you have bitterly opposed anyone stating anything against Sisu for well over a year, 1000's of posts of it.
This is the pertinent point. The truth is if the club doesn't return at some point it shuts down. I after 41 years of hardly missing a home game now don't attend at all. Ironically my family try and persuade me still to go as really it costs no more - then some moralistic dickheads keep bleating on about me being paid by joy and Tim while still watching for free on the hill or going to away games to give other clubs the revenue.
At this rate ill be there by January. Why not all the real objectors are watching every bloody game anyway!
I think you will find that the real objectors watch one goal and half of a pitch for most of a game, if you're going to argue, get the facts right.
I think you will find that the real objectors watch one goal and half of a pitch for most of a game, if you're going to argue, get the facts right.
Some others apparently close their eyes and turn their backs.
I think you will find that the real objectors watch one goal and half of a pitch for most of a game, if you're going to argue, get the facts right.
An even bigger own goal than lee dixin
I heard it was two thirds of the pitch. Can someone please clarify? We need FACTS.
Some fans choose to go on the hill, dont give Sisu any money, get publicity for KCIC, have a day out- a good day out last week by all accounts.
Torch, Grendel claim to not go to games so I presume support KCIC. So why all the bitterness? Just doesnt add up does it????
'I love lamp'you left it a bit late having your, now 3 year old, if you had , had him when you were young he would have witnessed the glory days of the first division ha ha.
The Trust have been advised by quite a few people on many occasions to try to unite the fans. But no, you lot knew best and followed a path that could only lead to disunity. I still remember your post when you were on the way to Crawley; 'real fans don't go to Sixfields'.
You lot got it wrong.
| Ricoh | Sixfield | % of Ricoh attendance |
| 12621 | 2204 | 17% |
| 10285 | 2068 | 20% |
| 9458 | 1789 | 19% |
| Total | ||
| 32364 | 6061 | 19% |
81% of "us lot" still disagree with you....
Ricoh Sixfield % of Ricoh attendance 12621 2204 17% 10285 2068 20% 9458 1789 19% Total 32364 6061 19%
Well then, sorry to break it, but you are wrong, I was on the hill last week with a laser level and dowsing rod and it was a comprehensive 51% pitch view which is far closer to my estimate than yours....FACT!
A Grappa Graph?....................................Coat.What do 'you lot' disagree with me about? I really don't give a toss if you stand on a hill, stay at home or go to Sixfields. I'm talking about splitting the fans into 'good' and 'bad'. Pretty poor table btw, couldn't you manage a graph?
What do 'you lot' disagree with me about? I really don't give a toss if you stand on a hill, stay at home or go to Sixfields. I'm talking about splitting the fans into 'good' and 'bad'. Pretty poor table btw, couldn't you manage a graph?
I dont go to the Hill... I dont go to Northampton to watch Coventry City. I guess thats my primary point of disagreement with you. But thats your choice.
Yes of course I could have managed a graph, moot point and somewhat churlish- no matter.
Point is- data speaks- "us lot" which in itself is a sad indictment to our situation, whichever side of the now apparent divide you sit remain steadfast in our resolve to bring CCFC home to Coventry-with our chosen course of action- you dont agree...enjoy Sixfield.
Someone please make this lad a graph!In the post you quoted I stated that I really don't give a toss what you do. How did you interpret that as me disagreeing with you?
Can you do a graph please? I like graphs.
In the post you quoted I stated that I really don't give a toss what you do. How did you interpret that as me disagreeing with you?
Can you do a graph please? I like graphs.
Have I misread this then? Apologies if so... was your point then not that those that don't go to Sixfield have chosen the wrong path?
sarcasm is the lowest form of wit
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?