Great. So the justification now for selling players is to boost turnover for a better FFP ratio in seasons to come? We would have to sell every player to reach the same level we'd have enjoyed by staying at the Ricoh. Brilliant!
Nick, any and all losses that sisu have are down to their own total mismanagement of the club.If your memory stretches
back to 2007 and the old CET forum you will recall that I told everybody not to get excited about sisu's arrival.
I told you all that sisu would only asset strip and we would sink down the leagues. Nothing as happened to change my view,in fact it's stronger now than it was then. Still NOPM KCIC.
They have given away and moral high ground be starving them out - all this will do is kill our club quicker, they believe that someone will come in and say the day, well lets see...
Say sisu anticipated £3m losses, but NOPM causes £4m losses it stands to reason that they might cash in a player for say £1m then cover the £3m like they had planned.
Say sisu anticipated £3m losses, but NOPM causes £4m losses it stands to reason that they might cash in a player for say £1m then cover the £3m like they had planned.
They would not have recapitalised the business to cover all losses then, as was promised. They would be covering their anticipated losses, and finding the balance from player sales.
And any such losses would wholly and solely be a function of their decision to relocate the club