Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Nopm and transfers (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Sep 2, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2013
  • #71
Grendel said:
The transfer fees would contribute in terms of FPP regulations. It would be nothing to do with covering losses.
Click to expand...

Great. So the justification now for selling players is to boost turnover for a better FFP ratio in seasons to come? We would have to sell every player to reach the same level we'd have enjoyed by staying at the Ricoh. Brilliant!
 

skybluefred

New Member
  • Sep 2, 2013
  • #72
Nick said:
And then people in NOPM will be happy? Or will they be pissed off that SISU sold the players to cover costs.... (if they do and its the case)
Click to expand...

Nick, any and all losses that sisu have are down to their own total mismanagement of the club.If your memory stretches
back to 2007 and the old CET forum you will recall that I told everybody not to get excited about sisu's arrival.
I told you all that sisu would only asset strip and we would sink down the leagues. Nothing as happened to change my view,in fact it's stronger now than it was then. Still NOPM KCIC.
 

Skybluerevolution (Pt2)

New Member
  • Sep 2, 2013
  • #73
Nick said:
If there are people refusing to give sisu any money, can they moan when and if players are sold?
Click to expand...

They have given away and moral high ground be starving them out - all this will do is kill our club quicker, they believe that someone will come in and say the day, well lets see...
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2013
  • #74
Mary_Mungo_Midge said:
SISU wouldn't be covering losses then, would they? The squad would be.

I am sorry, I really cannot understand why you are trying to defend any such possibility
Click to expand...

I'm not defending it.

Say sisu anticipated £3m losses, but NOPM causes £4m losses it stands to reason that they might cash in a player for say £1m then cover the £3m like they had planned.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 2, 2013
  • #75
stupot07 said:
I'm not defending it.

Say sisu anticipated £3m losses, but NOPM causes £4m losses it stands to reason that they might cash in a player for say £1m then cover the £3m like they had planned.
Click to expand...

They would not have recapitalised the business to cover all losses then, as was promised. They would be covering their anticipated losses, and finding the balance from player sales.

And any such losses would wholly and solely be a function of their decision to relocate the club
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?