There's nothing to purchase though?
If fans do not buy season tickets, they are more likely to kick the club out the league rather than force a sale.
If fans do not buy season tickets, they are more likely to kick the club out the league rather than force a sale.
And is this the nomp if we're out of cov or nomp until sisu leave campaign?
There's nothing to purchase though?
So just to be clear - you think that if it appears that the fans will not support SISU in moving the club out of the city, your view is that the FL would prefer to "kick the club out (of) the league", rather than try to broker a sale to another interested party.
Do you have any reason for this belief?
For what it's worth, I'm afraid that despite the reservations one must assume the FL have about SISU, they'll take the easy option (from their perspective) and give SISU/Otium the GS.
Utter nonsense. On what information do you base that assertion.
Timescales. At what point to the league decide its not feasible? Would they sanction a move mid season? If they have rubber stamped the sale ( I know they haven't yet) how can they force a sale? Can they apply to put the club in admin? Look how long this admin process is taking? Surely then there's a real threat of not being able to complete our fixtures, wouldn't that mean expulsion from the league? And what if we only sold 1000 tickets but sisu shirt sponsored for £3m per annum?
Seems to be a random list of sentences rather than a thought out opinion.
To answer a few:
The Portsmouth transaction took much longer than this.
The FL can't force a sale, but if they withhold the GS, even SISU might realise that their position is untenable (or in TF speak, that they're not "at the bottom of the cycle")
Not sure with the FL rules, but I recall that in the FIFA version of FFP, they were supposedly looking to ignore sponsorship deals that were not based on reasonable arms length terms.
I agree Portsmouth was a lot longer, but they averaged more than we did last season, they had cash coming in. Again at what point would the fa decide theres not enough money coming in and withhold the gs? The week before the season starts?2-3 games into the season? Next week?
We haven't even agreed a ground share, and tickets aren't on sale.
If fans do not buy season tickets, they are more likely to kick the club out the league rather than force a sale.
And is this the nomp if we're out of cov or nomp until sisu leave campaign?
Where do you get this info from
This is Not one more penny until the FL tell SISU the ground share is not financially viable. Allowing the football league to have a legally accountable reason to reject the ground share.
Been saying this consistently from the off.
Everyone says money is destroying the game and Ccfc are an example of how purely fiscal organisations like hedge funds are bad news.
Not one penny more is the best way true Cov fans can throw their weight behind this campaign and support their club.
It is to be hoped that the FL will be forced to recognise that Club with current owners is unviable.
Well, thats the third version of NOPM ive seen. Which is it?!
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk
I take it you can do it as long as you like to achieve whatever you want to achieve.
However if the FL said to the SBT that they will primarily decide on the right to ground share depending on how it will impact on FFP.
Then logic would suggest if you don't want to groin share the make sure the idea of it has a massive negative impact in FFP.
How do you think a club should be run financially?
Well, thats the third version of NOPM ive seen. Which is it?!
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk
I take it you can do it as long as you like to achieve whatever you want to achieve.
However if the FL said to the SBT that they will primarily decide on the right to ground share depending on how it will impact on FFP.
Then logic would suggest if you don't want to groin share the make sure the idea of it has a massive negative impact in FFP.
Oooh a groin share, sounds a bit seedy
Not by choosing to decimate it financially in order to destroy another company
Well, thats the third version of NOPM ive seen. Which is it?!
Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk
I take it you can do it as long as you like to achieve whatever you want to achieve.
However if the FL said to the SBT that they will primarily decide on the right to ground share depending on how it will impact on FFP.
Then logic would suggest if you don't want to groin share the make sure the idea of it has a massive negative impact in FFP.
How low do you think crowds would need to be? When would the football league make that decision?
How low do you think crowds would need to be? When would the football league make that decision?
As low as we can possibly make them. However we need Mr Fisher to announce to proposed ground and the package deal available.
Then if everyone refuses to take I that package the FA will see for certain the impact as oppose to speculating then hopefully the Ricoh will be back on.
If fans do not buy season tickets, they are more likely to kick the club out the league rather than force a sale.
And is this the nomp if we're out of cov or nomp until sisu leave campaign?
Was the FFP in force when you look at those other ground shares that were not blocked?
I believe their credit rating with the league will be strong. They have to my knowledge never defaulted on payments other than ACL. They certainly in terms of that have been better than the prior regime. Isn't one of the prior regime supposed to be chairman under one of the other bidders? His credit rating I suspect will not be as high.
Because the FL seem to have said to the SBT. They won't consider that the fans are all against the ground share when they decide whether to allow it or not.
They said they will however consider the impact a ground share would have on FFP.
Hence if it seems that the proposal itself leads to no one buying tickets and merchandise then the FL would have legitimate argument to say no to the ground share.
If the ground share means we can no longer operate within our budget due to pre existing contracts, how can the FA legally authorise such an event. Especially if there is a more viable alternative.
If the Ricoh cost the same as ground sharing and will mean we can meet the FFP criteria the FL will have to go for that. Otherwise they themselves are implemented in breaking the rules.
The Ricoh is available for free if the FA keeps us in administration.
true Cov fans
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?