Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

No Ojala or Smith (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter CovisGod
  • Start date Aug 19, 2016
Forums New posts

CovisGod

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #1
according to Mowbray, neither happening.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #2
As I thought Ojala deal was off as soon as we signed Turnbull.

Smith knees is back at Hitchin.

Mogga hopefull of some more bodies over the next few weeks.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #3
I think he believes we probably have enough bodies in defence now, but whether they are promotion material I don't know. An injury to Turnbull for example, and i think the gaps would start to show.

I know we've barely conceded yet, but we haven't been tested to any real level yet.

It's a shame, the sound of a Finnish international in defence would have been nice.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #4
Mogga said he was struggling in training. He said it looks like he's recovering a long term injury.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #5
I was never happy with orjala one to be honest
Would rather people who are tried and tested in British football
 

ClarkeZ

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #6
Not bringing in some kind of reinforcement for the defence worries me. Any injuries and we are thin on the ground in terms of quality.
Unless he's now more thinking of using the loan market instead of a permanent?

Either way, I'm still fearful for the season without more bodies of a higher level in this team.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #7
js_lilley said:
Not bringing in some kind of reinforcement for the defence worries me. Any injuries and we are thin on the ground in terms of quality.
Unless he's now more thinking of using the loan market instead of a permanent?

Either way, I'm still fearful for the season without more bodies of a higher level in this team.
Click to expand...

He hasn't said he's not bringing in his defensive reinforcements. He's just said he doesn't want to bring Ojala or Smith in.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #8
AFCCOVENTRY said:
As I thought Ojala deal was off as soon as we signed Turnbull.

Smith knees is back at Hitchin.

Mogga hopefull of some more bodies over the next few weeks.
Click to expand...

Do you work on the inside?
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #9
I still hope we bring in the Burnleys defender Anderson, better bet for me
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #10
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
Do you work on the inside?
Click to expand...
Says this on CT website.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sport/football/coventry-city-press-conference-live-11772228
 

ClarkeZ

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #11
fernandopartridge said:
He hasn't said he's not bringing in his defensive reinforcements. He's just said he doesn't want to bring Ojala or Smith in.
Click to expand...

The way he was talking in the pres conference seemed to hint that he wasn't.

“Can we afford to carry another full-back when you can argue Rose, Dion and Jordan Willis can fill that role?"
“The Finnish boy did fine - but he looked like he was recovering from a long term injury. He’s played at a high level of football, but we don’t have time to get him up to speed and we went for somebody who could hit the ground running for us.”

Just sounds final, we went for this option, no comment on further players being looked at for this position. He might just not be mentionning it, but as it stands I really hope he has something in the pipeline and hes playing his cards close to his chest.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #12
js_lilley said:
The way he was talking in the pres conference seemed to hint that he wasn't.

“Can we afford to carry another full-back when you can argue Rose, Dion and Jordan Willis can fill that role?"
“The Finnish boy did fine - but he looked like he was recovering from a long term injury. He’s played at a high level of football, but we don’t have time to get him up to speed and we went for somebody who could hit the ground running for us.”

Just sounds final, we went for this option, no comment on further players being looked at for this position. He might just not be mentionning it, but as it stands I really hope he has something in the pipeline and hes playing his cards close to his chest.
Click to expand...

He maybe doesn't want another right back, perhaps fair enough. He's got cover there like he says. He doesn't say anything about centre back; just doesn't want somebody who isn't fit. If he considers that Willis could be RB cover then logically another centre back is needed to cover Willis' position.
 

ClarkeZ

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #13
fernandopartridge said:
He maybe doesn't want another right back, perhaps fair enough. He's got cover there like he says. He doesn't say anything about centre back; just doesn't want somebody who isn't fit. If he considers that Willis could be RB cover then logically another centre back is needed to cover Willis' position.
Click to expand...

Hopefully you're correct
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #14
“Can we afford to carry another full-back when you can argue Rose, Dion and Jordan Willis can fill that role?"

Are any of these players any good at right back? I'd rather play at least two of them in other positions.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #15
I think we need a right back so it's a shame he doesn't think we need one
 

ceetee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #16
I think Willis is a good CB and the 3 x CB line-up suits his game. I also think he will get better, but no way is he a wing back
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #17
I wouldnt be surprised to see Willis at wing back tomorrow.

With Rose out I don't think we can afford to play DKE there against a physical Bradford side.

So I would expect Willis right wing back with Ricketts, Turnbull and Harries in the middle.

Or he could go back to a flat back 4 and perhaps leave Harries out (who has been excellent, but again his physicality would be a worry against Hanson and co.
 
S

SkyBlueCRJ

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #18
Think he is looking to bring in another centre back. If you look at the options we have now. We have Harries, Willis, Ricketts, Turnbull, Finch. McCann can also play there however his main role is going to be in the CM position. Only 4 of those are starters, Finch just isn't ready. Realistically he has to be looking at one more which is likely to be a loan. If he's claiming more bodies are coming in surely this is a position that is a priority as he's always reiterated that he wants two CB's to come in.

RWB is also a position i think we do need to be looking at despite TM's comments because Rose looks very uncomfortable in that role. Not sure why TM thinks he's an adequate candidate for starting in that position all season or why we don't need cover. Willis can't play there because he doesn't get up enough, he's a solid centre back and has done fantastic so far in that right sided CB role.
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #19
I did think it was a bit mental that some people were saying they hope we sign these two. I really doubt anyone has seen either play.

Granted we need bodies but our budget is tight and if they had their chance to impress on trial and failed then I'm happy to see them leave.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #20
Mowbray has had a good look at both. If he ain't convinced I am happy. I think we have one or two of our own who are capable of game time here and there. I don't want signings for the sake of it. I would rather save a bit of budget and not be forced to sell a body in January.
 

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 19, 2016
  • #21
Captain Dart said:
Says
Click to expand...
Hobo said:
Mowbray has had a good look at both. If he ain't convinced I am happy. I think we have one or two of our own who are capable of game time here and there. I don't want signings for the sake of it. I would rather save a bit of budget and not be forced to sell a body in January.
Click to expand...

I see your point, but if the budget is comparable to last season - At this rate, how are we even close to having to sell a body in January?

I reckon the Finn is probably good enough, and I reckon the injury was a jibe that he knew would get the fans on his side. The later comments excused those statements as well, as he effectively admitted we signed Turnbull instead. It probably means he has decided to use the remaining budget to cover other areas on the pitch.

Yes I know we're in league one, I know we have to play some of the kids. If we sign another 5 players including a centre back I'll revise my point, but I can't see it happening. I feel this was budget related.

Surely TM doesn't think Harries, DKE, Haynes et al are good enough to be regularly playing in a team mounting a promotion challenge in league one?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?