italiahorse
Well-Known Member
They seem to be going through the motions but not actually doing anything.
Does anyone actually take the SCG seriously?
They seem to be going through the motions but not actually doing anything.
The Ricoh was still on the horizon then,People were calling for administration last time weren't they so they would go?
That is my wind up personal policy.Is this just your personal opinion or official Trust policy?
That is my wind up personal policy.
I am just a normal member of the Trust I am not on the committee.
Ian was on his high horse so have him the answer he wanted from me.
I to feel that the academy is the main issue at the moment but we keep going back over old ground hindering the problems we have now.
Well I don't but as your representatives why are they not called out also?Does anyone actually take the SCG seriously?
Oh your a bitter man.............Stuff like this:
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/council-says-taxpayers-325k-out-11772291
The trust can be saying "Why are you harming the club if it was sisu doing the legal action?".
Instead, they will be probably pushing whatever the council say.
Oh your a bitter man.............
Breath
Why is it bitter? Common sense really, the club is pretty much been blackmailed.
Must be bitter to point it out.
Even Dongo has said that is wrong... Simon Gilbert has said he doesn't agree with it.
Still, it makes me bitter for pointing out it is wrong. There are outraged statements about us selling vincelot, but just let the club being blackmailed about it's home and academy pass by then!
Why should they help while they are being taken though the courts?
Strange you can't see this !!
Drop the silly court cases and lets move on.
What is stranger is that you can't see it is pretty much blackmail?
Are the council going to order Wasps and CSF to suddenly sort it? What power do they have to make a deal happen?
Bloody hell Nick , Im glad I ve not got your glasses 1I find it funny that you see conspiracy in everything but Sisu
What is stranger is that you can't see it is pretty much blackmail?
Are the council going to order Wasps and CSF to suddenly sort it? What power do they have to make a deal happen?
Where did I say conspiracy?
Why should they help while they are being taken though the courts?
Strange you can't see this !!
Drop the silly court cases and lets move on.
Duggins and Maton have previously said they would not obstruct the football club
So clearly they recognise the distinction - until it suits them to do otherwise
Well you are surmising Blackmail , You will end up in court one day
There not obstructing them , just not helping or dealing with them , there is a distinct difference ..
There not obstructing them , just not helping or dealing with them , there is a distinct difference ..
How are they helping the football club?
Really? Like the letter about the Butts.
Still, you can push what you want but when Dongo says something is wrong the council have done it's safe to say it isn't right.
There not ???
The council have protocol to follow
Protocol or Agenda?
Protocol wasn't followed when they bailed out ACL. Just because the court's sided with them didn't mean protocol was followed BTW
What protocol should they have followed ?
Protocol or Agenda?
Protocol wasn't followed when they bailed out ACL. Just because the court's sided with them didn't mean protocol was followed BTW
PMSL how many judges ?? Now you !!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm a member of the trust and can't remember the last time I was asked about anything. Although I do seem to recall that the last time the trust polled its membership on this subject the questions were very leading.Do not have the exact percentage available, but when the Trust last put it out to membership it was a massive majority.
Totally agree with this. What happens if we don't get a new deal at the Ricoh and we are moved again. How can the trust say it is wrong when they have failed to make any statement against Wasps move?It's not going to change what has happened you are right - but it establishes clearly the principles of said organisation.
I believe the trust should have an educational role. The amount of people who will through out 'facts' about the situation that are totally wrong is unbelievable. Any campaign against SISU would be much more successful if all the incorrect things thrown around were eliminated. Just this week we've had Kev Monks sounding off about the training ground and a post of the Spotted Coventry page about a kid being overcharged as they didn't believe his age when if you actually look at what was being said he was charged the correct price. There was a chap on the radio complaining TM was forced to sell Vincelot and people banging on about how much the club have put up the parking.The trust can be saying "Why are you harming the club if it was sisu doing the legal action?".
If you think that the council bail out was acceptable use of our or their (note: not there) money then carry on matey. Not sure who you're (see I spelt it right) trying to get at on here but you're (again) flogging a dead horse. People are seeing through the council and their (again) vision for a City of Rugby and no matter how hard you try on here, most people won't take the slightest interest in any line you're peddling.
I have yet to hear one positive thing from anyone outside of the city about Wasps moving here. A while back I posted some quotes showing what was being said. If it has raised the cities profile its certainly not in a positive way.I would also suggest they like the higher profile the city has gained since Wasps arrived.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?