As usual wit the CT, it's 10-12 paragraphs in which there are only 3 paragraphs with new/useful info:
The Court of Appeal will now rule on whether if the club’s lawyers can formally appeal between October 10 and October 31.
If successful, Sisu’s case would be heard by three senior judges at the Court of Appeal during the next available window.
Should the court reject permission to appeal at this stage, Sisu could apply for an oral hearing to state their case in person.
Unfortunately those three paragraphs of new information are useless to our average reader without the background / context.
It's also helpful, to those who have been following the story, to remind people where we are after a very long and confusing process.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nick, add Journalism to the SBT University along with accounting, state aid law and marketing.
There'll be a SBT MBA soon at this rate.
Unfortunately those three paragraphs of new information are useless to our average reader without the background / context.
It's also helpful, to those who have been following the story, to remind people where we are after a very long and confusing process.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I give a rats, but until something actually happens there's not much to say. Just for the sake of moving on I hope it's rejected. I assume we can't be kicked out of the Ricoh now for another 2 years so it's less pressing than it was when we were away.
I'd like to think that but there's probably some sort of clause saying we can...in the same way that we broke a 3 year agreement with Northampton FC.
WM
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?